Diesel Forum Forum for Diesel engine vehicle related discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2.2L I-4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-25-2009, 04:44 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
scottybdiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spicewood, TX
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 GL 320, 2007 Silverado LTZ C3500 Duramax Turbo Diesel
2.2L I-4

Any news on whether they will be bringing it to the US? I read one article a while back, that said it would be available in a C and a GLK.
Old 06-26-2009, 04:43 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
They won't. Americans don't want to pay $40-50K for a 4-cylinder powered car, it would sell poorly.
Old 06-26-2009, 07:25 AM
  #3  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
scottybdiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spicewood, TX
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 GL 320, 2007 Silverado LTZ C3500 Duramax Turbo Diesel
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
They won't. Americans don't want to pay $40-50K for a 4-cylinder powered car, it would sell poorly.
That depends on which American you ask. If they are willing to pay 40K for a V6 gas that only gets 16/21 MPG, why wouldn't they pay it for a 4cyl diesel with 204 HP 354 ft/lb and get 34 MPG?
Old 06-26-2009, 09:58 AM
  #4  
Super Member
 
Wolfgang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MBs
My guess is that MBUSA might offer it in the C or GLK, starting next year.

Here's a picture from the production line.



http://www.mdc-power.de
Old 06-26-2009, 12:35 PM
  #5  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
scottybdiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spicewood, TX
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 GL 320, 2007 Silverado LTZ C3500 Duramax Turbo Diesel
My guess is that MBUSA might offer it in the C or GLK, starting next year.
That would be nice. 1 or 2 years to work out the bugs and I might be in the market for MY 2012 GLK 250.
Old 06-26-2009, 04:18 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by scottybdiving
If they are willing to pay 40K for a V6 gas that only gets 16/21 MPG, why wouldn't they pay it for a 4cyl diesel with 204 HP 354 ft/lb and get 34 MPG?
Most Americans don't know that. All they see is its a 2.2L 4-banger and the C300 has 25 more hp, costs $2000 less and doesn't need urea refills.
Old 06-27-2009, 07:37 AM
  #7  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
scottybdiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spicewood, TX
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 GL 320, 2007 Silverado LTZ C3500 Duramax Turbo Diesel
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
Most Americans don't know that. All they see is its a 2.2L 4-banger and the C300 has 25 more hp, costs $2000 less and doesn't need urea refills.
Where did you see that the 2.2L will cost $2000 more than the gas? The GL 320 is still $1000 less than a GL450, even with Bluetec. My '08 was $2500 less than a GL450.

Even if it did cost $2K more, It would pay for itself pretty quickly at today's diesel vs premium prices. A lot quicker than a hybrid.
Old 06-27-2009, 08:29 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by scottybdiving
Where did you see that the 2.2L will cost $2000 more than the gas? The GL 320 is still $1000 less than a GL450, even with Bluetec. My '08 was $2500 less than a GL450.
Last I checked, the 320 was a V6 not a V8.

Lets look at something actually comparable, the ML.

ML350 $44,600
ML320 BlueTec $48,600
Difference= $4000

Even if it did cost $2K more, It would pay for itself pretty quickly at today's diesel vs premium prices.
Lets use Colorado, we have some of the lowest prices in the USA.
Cheapest Premium $2.56
Cheapest Diesel $2.39

The 350 gets a combined 17mpg, BlueTec gets 20mpg combined.

It would take 70,600 miles to break even, about 8 years of average driving.
Old 06-27-2009, 02:11 PM
  #9  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
scottybdiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spicewood, TX
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 GL 320, 2007 Silverado LTZ C3500 Duramax Turbo Diesel
Last I checked, the 320 was a V6 not a V8.
........and the GLK 250 will be a Inline 4 cyl, not a V6.

The GL 320 gets 19 combined (mine gets 22 combined) vs GL 450 15 combined. Based on Fueleconomy.gov and fuel prices at the time, to drive 25 miles, a GL 320 cost 2.99 and a GL 450 cost 4.43. However, the GL 320 doesn't have to recuperate anything because it cost less to start with.

The same principal should apply costwise, to the I4 vs V6, only the spread in MPG is much larger.

I have paid as much as $8000 premium for the diesels in my trucks. The real savings has been on the tail end, at re-sale. It remains to be seen where these new diesels will end up in that respect.

Last edited by scottybdiving; 06-27-2009 at 02:35 PM.
Old 06-27-2009, 04:26 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by scottybdiving
It remains to be seen where these new diesels will end up in that respect.
Especially for an extremely overcomplicated 4-banger with a pee bucket. The V6 is bad enough being designed as a throw-away engine.
Old 06-27-2009, 05:22 PM
  #11  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
scottybdiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spicewood, TX
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 GL 320, 2007 Silverado LTZ C3500 Duramax Turbo Diesel
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
Especially for an extremely overcomplicated 4-banger with a pee bucket. The V6 is bad enough being designed as a throw-away engine.
Where do you get your information? 1st you said the 2.2L would cost $2K more than the V6. Now you say the 3.0L V6 diesel is designed as a throw away engine. I would like to read this stuff.

I'm not a big fan of the "pee bucket" myself but we better all get used to them because thay are going to be a part of our lives for the foreseeable future. This also include OTR trucks and heavy equipment which I deal with on a daily basis.
Old 06-28-2009, 04:18 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by scottybdiving
Where do you get your information? ... Now you say the 3.0L V6 diesel is designed as a throw away engine.
Reality. Its low cost, designed primarily around meeting emissions limits, integrated cam bearings in the valve cover, damage the valve cover and you replace the whole cylinder head, bend a piston oil jet and you replace the whole block, no cylinder sleeves, not rebuildable, etc.

The last "real" engine Mercedes designed was the OM613.

I'm not a big fan of the "pee bucket" myself but we better all get used to them because thay are going to be a part of our lives for the foreseeable future.
It will have no part of mine. I will not buy a vehicle equipped with that useless trash. If I have no choice, the only time it will be operating is the time between when I take the keys and when it reaches my driveway. At that time the DPF, cat, pee tank and EGR will all go in the garbage can and I'll enjoy a cleaner running and much more efficient engine.

This also include OTR trucks and heavy equipment which I deal with on a daily basis.
Thats different; I get paid to work on them, not buy them.
Old 06-28-2009, 07:09 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Goatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1987 SDL; 2001 Chevy 2500HD CC, 8.1L, Allison special order; 1970 GTO LS2, 4L60E, under construction
Originally Posted by scottybdiving
Where do you get your information? 1st you said the 2.2L would cost $2K more than the V6. Now you say the 3.0L V6 diesel is designed as a throw away engine. I would like to read this stuff.


You'll never read it, except on one wanna-be MB forum out there.... You'll be member #3 if you join.


The Euro models will eventually come to the US. Especially when our less than bright country men continue to elect the kinds of folks they're electing now.

Looked at a Ford Transit Connect Wednesday on US soil. Pretty neat car/van. Its in deisel version overseas, but only gas here.....For now... We'll be buying 16 of them as soon as they're available. Hopefully that will help convince Ford and the rest to start bringing over some cool stuff in deisel. Unfortunatley, the economy isn't real great for them to gamble.
Old 06-28-2009, 05:48 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
polarbexar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 452
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
2017 CLA Motorsport Edition, 2015 G550, 2012 GLK350
Last I heard the 2.2 won't need the urea in the catalyst. How about some optimism for more choice. ( I like four banger Mercs Thank you very much! )
Old 06-28-2009, 05:49 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

 
polarbexar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 452
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
2017 CLA Motorsport Edition, 2015 G550, 2012 GLK350
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
They won't. Americans don't want to pay $40-50K for a 4-cylinder powered car, it would sell poorly.
Don't tell that to Audi! Shhh I might buy one.
Old 06-28-2009, 08:52 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by polarbexar
Don't tell that to Audi!
Thats because a 4-banger is all they offer. If they had the 2.5L or 3.0L V6 as an option, I know they would be selling Passats like hotcakes.
Old 06-29-2009, 06:18 PM
  #17  
Senior Member

 
polarbexar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 452
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
2017 CLA Motorsport Edition, 2015 G550, 2012 GLK350
I know you mean the A4 or possibly the A6. VW sold the Passat with the 2.0 Diesel " like hot cakes." For a diesel enthusiast you sure do dislike them.
Old 06-29-2009, 07:00 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by polarbexar
For a diesel enthusiast you sure do dislike them.
They use a timing belt, thats reason enough to hate them.

Then when they do decide to use a chain, they make up some Rube Goldberg cr@p.

Attached Thumbnails 2.2L I-4-3l-tdi-timing-chain.jpg  

Last edited by 240D 3.0T; 06-29-2009 at 07:11 PM.
Old 06-29-2009, 08:14 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
c240PORTUGA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
Last I checked, the 320 was a V6 not a V8.

Lets look at something actually comparable, the ML.

ML350 $44,600
ML320 BlueTec $48,600
Difference= $4000


Lets use Colorado, we have some of the lowest prices in the USA.
Cheapest Premium $2.56
Cheapest Diesel $2.39

The 350 gets a combined 17mpg, BlueTec gets 20mpg combined

It would take 70,600 miles to break even, about 8 years of average driving.

thats for a non 4-matic ML. the ml350 4matic is 47100 so the difference is only $1500 to get the bluetec. and many have claimed to get 25mpg, so its a no-brainer
Old 06-29-2009, 08:14 PM
  #20  
Super Member
 
Rob CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 510
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
E55 AMG | Buell Lightning XB12
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
Reality. Its low cost, designed primarily around meeting emissions limits, integrated cam bearings in the valve cover, damage the valve cover and you replace the whole cylinder head, bend a piston oil jet and you replace the whole block, no cylinder sleeves, not rebuildable, etc.
Forgive my ignorance, but I've read many-many times the OM642 block uses cylinder liners. This attribute remains irrepairable? I'm a little confused by that statement.

The heads/cams etc. I understand completely however.

btw: Your was is hacked.
Old 06-29-2009, 08:58 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by Rob CL
Forgive my ignorance, but I've read many-many times the OM642 block uses cylinder liners.
They are cast in.

was?
Old 06-29-2009, 10:59 PM
  #22  
Senior Member

 
polarbexar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 452
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
2017 CLA Motorsport Edition, 2015 G550, 2012 GLK350
Whats was??

Anyway further the tangent--- the 3.0 is a timing belt. Is the reference to a wrestler good or bad? I've replaced several belts on 1.9 TDI no big deal. The Audi 5000, that I had was a 5 cylinder diesel went great for over 400K until an old bronco ran over it. My point is that small diesels are great, don't knock them.
Old 06-30-2009, 12:11 AM
  #23  
Super Member
 
Rob CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 510
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
E55 AMG | Buell Lightning XB12
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
They are cast in.

was?
I realize this is OT but the site in your sig was hacked by some Iranian hacker. They posted some message about Obama needing to mind his own business state-side.

/OT


Thanks for the clarification on the sleeves. So when overhaul service is due, what exactly gets replaced? -How durable is this engine as a factor of miles, would you say?
Old 06-30-2009, 12:12 AM
  #24  
Super Member
 
Rob CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 510
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
E55 AMG | Buell Lightning XB12
Originally Posted by polarbexar
Whats was??

Anyway further the tangent--- the 3.0 is a timing belt. Is the reference to a wrestler good or bad? I've replaced several belts on 1.9 TDI no big deal. The Audi 5000, that I had was a 5 cylinder diesel went great for over 400K until an old bronco ran over it. My point is that small diesels are great, don't knock them.
Which 3.0 are you speaking on?
Old 06-30-2009, 05:28 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by Rob CL
I realize this is OT but the site in your sig was hacked by some Iranian hacker. They posted some message about Obama needing to mind his own business state-side.
Ah yeah, Rolf wasn't keeping up on the forum's security updates.

So when overhaul service is due, what exactly gets replaced?
You order a whole engine for about $10,000.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2.2L I-4



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 AM.