MB bluetec lawsuit in USA
#51
Junior Member
Have to also add to this fact " to pay a billion Euros for not being guilty ?" why does that. if you are not guilty you would fight it to the end not to pay . But lets just say for example you have a company and you are not guilty and someone accuses you of wrong doing , and you know you are not guilty and you give someone a billion for not being guilty just because you have extra cash ? maybe. There is no logic there. Where there is smoke there is fire , in my opinion.
#52
Senior Member
You guys should do your research before you start salivating over a settlement. Comparing the VW diesel issues to the MB diesel "issues" is like comparing apples to mobile phones. They aren't remotely the same thing. The heart of the VW issue was that VW didn't want to retrofit urea injection into it's cars, so it developed the defeat device in order to avoid that expense. The car ran very inefficiently during the testing process, but passed emissions. In the real world, the cars delivered the efficiency and power that VW needed to sell them, but were gross polluters.
MB, on the other hand DID implement urea injection and the vehicles do pass emissions (most of you have never had them tested because most states don't test diesel passenger vehicles) and deliver the power that was advertised.
So what can this lawsuit possible deliver to owners? Nothing.
The recall in Europe was a small software tweak, but MB did not have to provide owners any compensation. If you know the auto business you know that big manufacturers 'self certify' and the regulatory agencies take them on their word until they believe they have a reason to independently test them to verify. Essentially, MB paid a fine in order to sweep this under the rug. The press over-blew the whole diesel thing and MB wanted it to go away because it sells HUGE numbers of diesels in Europe and the rest of the world.
I'm moving to Europe in two weeks and I'm bringing my 2012 GL350 with me. I was over there last week and went to an inspection station to speak with the techs to see if I would run into any trouble. They told me no, that if the vehicle was in good mechanical condition, I will have no issues; the MBs pass just fine. Every taxi in town is a diesel. 90% of the cars that I see driving around on the streets of Helsinki are diesel. Diesel is still cheaper than gas by a pretty wide margin. Diesel isn't going anywhere until the electric charging infrastructure improves and electric car prices drop to the point where they can compete without government rebates.
The lawsuit is going nowhere. Stop relying on the press for your information. They only write stories that sell papers, the truth is never their goal.
MB, on the other hand DID implement urea injection and the vehicles do pass emissions (most of you have never had them tested because most states don't test diesel passenger vehicles) and deliver the power that was advertised.
So what can this lawsuit possible deliver to owners? Nothing.
The recall in Europe was a small software tweak, but MB did not have to provide owners any compensation. If you know the auto business you know that big manufacturers 'self certify' and the regulatory agencies take them on their word until they believe they have a reason to independently test them to verify. Essentially, MB paid a fine in order to sweep this under the rug. The press over-blew the whole diesel thing and MB wanted it to go away because it sells HUGE numbers of diesels in Europe and the rest of the world.
I'm moving to Europe in two weeks and I'm bringing my 2012 GL350 with me. I was over there last week and went to an inspection station to speak with the techs to see if I would run into any trouble. They told me no, that if the vehicle was in good mechanical condition, I will have no issues; the MBs pass just fine. Every taxi in town is a diesel. 90% of the cars that I see driving around on the streets of Helsinki are diesel. Diesel is still cheaper than gas by a pretty wide margin. Diesel isn't going anywhere until the electric charging infrastructure improves and electric car prices drop to the point where they can compete without government rebates.
The lawsuit is going nowhere. Stop relying on the press for your information. They only write stories that sell papers, the truth is never their goal.
#53
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,080
Received 1,735 Likes
on
1,384 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Have to also add to this fact " to pay a billion Euros for not being guilty ?" why does that. if you are not guilty you would fight it to the end not to pay . But lets just say for example you have a company and you are not guilty and someone accuses you of wrong doing , and you know you are not guilty and you give someone a billion for not being guilty just because you have extra cash ? maybe. There is no logic there. Where there is smoke there is fire , in my opinion.
#54
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: unbegrenzt
Posts: 13,316
Received 3,920 Likes
on
3,086 Posts
2017 GLE350 4MATIC
An important difference in the M-B vs VW cases, is that the VW case seemed to originate with an objection raised by a regulatory agency, CARB. The M-B case appears to originate from an NGO, the law firm representing the class.
The following users liked this post:
Etienne Lau (01-11-2020)
#55
Senior Member
Indeed, that's why I think this is a DOA. The law firm filing this, claims testing was done, but they have not substantiated who did the testing. As I stated in my previous post, the silence from CARB who is completely separate from EPA, is very deafening with respect to the legitimacy of the lawyers legal claim. Others on here have stated there is a smoking gun....We however in the US do not follow EU6 standards, we also do not have on road testing, in fact I do not believe there is a single state that actually does actual diesel emissions testing on passenger vehicles. And for that matter a lot of states such as Texas, exempt diesel passenger vehicles from any emissions testing of any kind, instead only gasoline powered vehicles are required to satisfy an OBDII emissions test.
The following users liked this post:
chassis (12-27-2019)
#56
Junior Member
Like I mentioned before everyone is entitled to his own , opinion. When you see the facts it is obvious when everything got stared in 2016, you can see the Trump administration changing EPA and CARB staff and its directors , so it is more than obvious who is staling the process. And yes you are right in between the VW and Mercedes case when Obama Administrations was EPA and Carb were doing their job and things got done. In Daimler diesel case there is nothing left to do then Private Class action lawsuit if won than everyone will act after fact. Read the 477 pages of the lawsuit it will be very clear with lots of proves of cheating. https://www.hbsslaw.com/uploads/case...-complaint.pdf, no innocent company pays 1 Billion penalty in Germany just for giggles. It might not happen soon enough but give it 6 months from now when you read in the newspaper they got nailed. I hope there is buyback because everyone that I know would sell their diesel bluetec cars back asap to them , no one would keep any of the bluetec high maintenance cheating garbage that is poisoning environment and everyone in it.
#57
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,080
Received 1,735 Likes
on
1,384 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
But I suspect they have very poor testers as my cars and truck record 0 particles, including the car with DPF delete.
Funny gasoline vehicles don't get sniffed and don't go on rolls. OBD only.
The following users liked this post:
Etienne Lau (02-06-2023)
#58
Senior Member
Like I mentioned before everyone is entitled to his own , opinion. When you see the facts it is obvious when everything got stared in 2016, you can see the Trump administration changing EPA and CARB staff and its directors , so it is more than obvious who is staling the process. And yes you are right in between the VW and Mercedes case when Obama Administrations was EPA and Carb were doing their job and things got done. In Daimler diesel case there is nothing left to do then Private Class action lawsuit if won than everyone will act after fact. Read the 477 pages of the lawsuit it will be very clear with lots of proves of cheating. https://www.hbsslaw.com/uploads/case...-complaint.pdf, no innocent company pays 1 Billion penalty in Germany just for giggles. It might not happen soon enough but give it 6 months from now when you read in the newspaper they got nailed. I hope there is buyback because everyone that I know would sell their diesel bluetec cars back asap to them , no one would keep any of the bluetec high maintenance cheating garbage that is poisoning environment and everyone in it.
Since you keep insisting on OPINION!!!!! You look at all those F250 diesels, GM Diesel and Dodge Diesel pickup trucks. I doubt they meet the standards as well, but you don't see anyone filing lawsuits over the issue. If anything they the owners can't wait to do the deletes themselves.......Why else would plenty of those trucks be able to "rolling coal", not that I encourage that act.....
#59
Senior Member
"The opacity meter
measures the opacity (visible particulate emissions) of
your exhaust. A sample of the exhaust is gathered and
evaluated by the opacity meter. A visual inspection for
tampering of emission control devices is also part of the
inspection procedure"
Basically NOX is not tested or measured. The only device the opacity test might pickup is if you do not have a DPF filter. But even then unless you are rolling coal, I doubt you will fail the opacity test.
#60
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,080
Received 1,735 Likes
on
1,384 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
My F350 with 6.7l diesel scored 0 as well.
As for "visual inspection" part, I leave no comments....
Last edited by kajtek1; 12-30-2019 at 11:38 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Etienne Lau (12-30-2019)
#61
Junior Member
For not being guilty things are moving to the right direction . https://europe.autonews.com/automake...sel-disclosure
Cant wait to hear for the Buyback here soon.
Cant wait to hear for the Buyback here soon.
#62
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,080
Received 1,735 Likes
on
1,384 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
For not being guilty things are moving to the right direction . https://europe.autonews.com/automake...sel-disclosure
Cant wait to hear for the Buyback here soon.
Cant wait to hear for the Buyback here soon.
Shareholders are owners of the company.
They sue themselves?
Sounds like the only winners here will be lawyers.
#63
Senior Member
Defeat Devices as defined by the EU and the US are very different:
EPA:
The US EPA defines defeat devices based on U.S. regulation 40 Code of Federal Regulation
(CFR) §86.1803-01 as follows:
“Defeat device means an auxiliary emission control device (AECD)122 that reduces the
effectiveness of the emission control system under conditions which may reasonably
be expected to be encountered in normal vehicle operation and use, unless:
(1) Such conditions are substantially included in the Federal emission test procedure;
(2) The need for the AECD is justified in terms of protecting the vehicle against
damage or accident;
(3) The AECD does not go beyond the requirements of engine starting; or
(4) The AECD applies only for emergency vehicles and the need is justified in terms
of preventing the vehicle from losing speed, torque, or power due to abnormal
conditions of the emission control system, or in terms of preventing such abnormal
conditions from occurring, during operation related to emergency response. Examples
EURO Defeat Devices:
Defeat devices are in principle forbidden in the EU. Article 5 (2) of Euro 6 Regulation
715/2007/EC121 prohibits the use of defeat devices apart from a few exemptions, including
to protect the engine against damage and ensure safe operation.
Article 3(10) defines defeat device as “any element of design which senses
temperature, vehicle speed, engine speed (RPM), transmission gear, manifold vacuum
or any other parameter for the purpose of activating, modulating, delaying or
deactivating the operation of any part of the emission control system, that reduces
the effectiveness of the emission control system under conditions which may
reasonably be expected to be encountered in normal vehicle operation and use”.
#65
Senior Member
Small movement on the lawsuits. https://www.law360.com/delaware/arti...ase-back-to-nj
#67
I read it but I don't know what this means: "we will vacate the District Court’s order and remand this matter to the District Court for consideration of the Mercedes Manufacturers’ third-party beneficiary and equitable estoppel arguments under applicable state law"
#68
Senior Member
Mind you I am not a lawyer, but having now read it at least 3-4 times, It basically means the judge will not deal with this matter and sent it back because the plaintiffs are required as part of their purchase contract to arbitrate this with Mercedes Benz. In other words, nothing is happening at this point.
#69
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,080
Received 1,735 Likes
on
1,384 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
#70
Really?
At first they did not do anything in Germany and than came 1 Billion with a B penalty for which they did not apeal . Secondly why export all the newly made Diesel SUV 2017 2018 back to Germany for “ retrofitting” , because they like to waist money? Or to maybe to minimize the exposure of the potential loss. Now I hear in France there is huge class action lawsuit going on?.
Here the Trump administration obviously got paid to stalled it . They definitely did not count the private class action lawsuit going on now. It remains to be seen, but where there is smoke there is fire.
Here the Trump administration obviously got paid to stalled it . They definitely did not count the private class action lawsuit going on now. It remains to be seen, but where there is smoke there is fire.
The following 3 users liked this post by Monksterman:
#71
Diesel NoX Software Upgrade
Hi All from UK
A software update is being applied to all diesel MB from Dec 2019.
I have been talking to the dealer, and while being helpful and supportive are unable to offer further assistance. I believe the dealers are frustrated too, as there are now a significant loyal customer base who are unhappy as their cars have been de-tuned.
Beware: This software update will radically changed you car for the worse, but improve your NoX.
The issue has to be taken up with Mercedes Benz and an official complaint raised, a complaint number needs to be sort:
Contact MB on: UK: 01908 245000
They acknowledge:
* This is an official MB "enhancement", and that the NoX levels would be reduced. I stated I would have chosen a petrol version if I required lower NoX levels.
* The top gear in 7 & 9 gears models only operate at ~76 MPH, above the UK legal limit, all gear change points have been effected.
* MANUALLY placing the car into 9th at 70mph has limited effect, as on the flat it will automatically move to DRIVE and change to 8th.
* Operating within the speed limit the car will never reach top gear
* The fuel economy is worse, as the engine power curve has been lowered. So that the engine revs higher; regurgitating more exhaust gasses and significantly warming the catalytic converter, hence lowering NoX.
* Additional ad-blue will be consumed.
* All MB approved second-hand cars must have this "enhancement" to leave the forecourt.
* All regular services by MB will incorporate the enhancement, under the T&C, to service the vehicle.
I believe that MB is encouraging drivers to operate above the speed limit, not consistent with the flow of motorway traffic, putting drivers and passenger's safety at greater risk.
This has been miss sold as an enhancement, when MB will not tell you the consequences of the update.
Is anyone aware of a Class-Action, as this is not the car I originally purchased.
Follow up action with Mercedes Benz
“Paddy Byrne” from the Mercedes Benz call centre has said (attached).
“The dealer has contacted Mercedes Benz Technical and has confirmed it is impossible to reverse the software update”. Therefore, our response can only be “The software cannot be reversed”.
have said that I can raise the issue with “The Motor Ombudsman”
Follow up Action with The Motor Ombudsman
The Motor Ombudsman has said that it is outside of their remit and cannot help
I should contact the “Citizen’s Advice Bureau”
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Mercedes-Benz Customer Service PB-1-25906028206
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:14:53 +0100
From: cs.uk@cac.mercedes-benz.com
To:
13th February 2020
Ref: PB-1-25906028206
Dear Mr Winstanley,
Mercedes-Benz Model: C-Class C 250 d 4MATIC
Chassis No: WDDxxxxxxxxxx
Registration: xxxxxx
Thank you for contacting Mercedes-Benz Customer Service.
As per our recent phone conversation, the following is written confirmation of our final statement with regards to your complaint case. Based on the concerns you raised regarding the change in gear shifting since a software update was applied, I raised a complaint case and conducted an investigation.
I contacted Mercedes-Benz of Southampton for feedback regarding your issue. The Retailer have confirmed they contacted our internal technical specialists who have advised that it is impossible to reverse the software update. As discussed, 9th gear is still reachable by manual gear shifts at a lower speed. However, I can appreciate taking into account influences of road inclination and load, that the car can shift quite easily back to 8th gear. Having been in contact with our trained technicians I can confirm that the car cannot be returned to its previous state.
I trust this finds you well and should you have any further requirements, please do not hesitate to contact me or any of my colleagues.
If you are unhappy with this final decision or feel this matter is unresolved, you can seek advice with an CTSI Certified Alternative Dispute Resolution provider. We are prepared to engage with The Motor Ombudsman to resolve your dispute. Further details can be found at www.themotorombudsman.org, or alternatively their telephone number is 0345 241 3008 selecting option 1.
Yours sincerely
Paddy Byrne
Customer Service UK
Mercedes-Benz UK Customer Service can be contacted by telephone on 008 009 777 7777 or 0207 660 9993, Monday - Friday between 08:00 & 18:00.
Mercedes-Benz Customer Assistance Center Maastricht N.V. Gelissendomein 5, 6229 GK Maastricht , Netherlands. Register No.: K.v.K. Limburg 33014909
If you are not the addressee please inform us immediately that you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete it. We thank you for your support.
Mercedes-Benz collects and processes your personal data as necessary for the provision of our services.
If you would like to know more about your general privacy rights, we refer you to the privacy statement on the following website: www.mercedes-benz.co.uk
[ACTIVITY ID:1-BYU0C0U][CASE ID:1-BWFS3AM]
A software update is being applied to all diesel MB from Dec 2019.
I have been talking to the dealer, and while being helpful and supportive are unable to offer further assistance. I believe the dealers are frustrated too, as there are now a significant loyal customer base who are unhappy as their cars have been de-tuned.
Beware: This software update will radically changed you car for the worse, but improve your NoX.
The issue has to be taken up with Mercedes Benz and an official complaint raised, a complaint number needs to be sort:
Contact MB on: UK: 01908 245000
They acknowledge:
* This is an official MB "enhancement", and that the NoX levels would be reduced. I stated I would have chosen a petrol version if I required lower NoX levels.
* The top gear in 7 & 9 gears models only operate at ~76 MPH, above the UK legal limit, all gear change points have been effected.
* MANUALLY placing the car into 9th at 70mph has limited effect, as on the flat it will automatically move to DRIVE and change to 8th.
* Operating within the speed limit the car will never reach top gear
* The fuel economy is worse, as the engine power curve has been lowered. So that the engine revs higher; regurgitating more exhaust gasses and significantly warming the catalytic converter, hence lowering NoX.
* Additional ad-blue will be consumed.
* All MB approved second-hand cars must have this "enhancement" to leave the forecourt.
* All regular services by MB will incorporate the enhancement, under the T&C, to service the vehicle.
I believe that MB is encouraging drivers to operate above the speed limit, not consistent with the flow of motorway traffic, putting drivers and passenger's safety at greater risk.
This has been miss sold as an enhancement, when MB will not tell you the consequences of the update.
Is anyone aware of a Class-Action, as this is not the car I originally purchased.
Follow up action with Mercedes Benz
“Paddy Byrne” from the Mercedes Benz call centre has said (attached).
“The dealer has contacted Mercedes Benz Technical and has confirmed it is impossible to reverse the software update”. Therefore, our response can only be “The software cannot be reversed”.
have said that I can raise the issue with “The Motor Ombudsman”
Follow up Action with The Motor Ombudsman
The Motor Ombudsman has said that it is outside of their remit and cannot help
I should contact the “Citizen’s Advice Bureau”
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Mercedes-Benz Customer Service PB-1-25906028206
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:14:53 +0100
From: cs.uk@cac.mercedes-benz.com
To:
13th February 2020
Ref: PB-1-25906028206
Dear Mr Winstanley,
Mercedes-Benz Model: C-Class C 250 d 4MATIC
Chassis No: WDDxxxxxxxxxx
Registration: xxxxxx
Thank you for contacting Mercedes-Benz Customer Service.
As per our recent phone conversation, the following is written confirmation of our final statement with regards to your complaint case. Based on the concerns you raised regarding the change in gear shifting since a software update was applied, I raised a complaint case and conducted an investigation.
I contacted Mercedes-Benz of Southampton for feedback regarding your issue. The Retailer have confirmed they contacted our internal technical specialists who have advised that it is impossible to reverse the software update. As discussed, 9th gear is still reachable by manual gear shifts at a lower speed. However, I can appreciate taking into account influences of road inclination and load, that the car can shift quite easily back to 8th gear. Having been in contact with our trained technicians I can confirm that the car cannot be returned to its previous state.
I trust this finds you well and should you have any further requirements, please do not hesitate to contact me or any of my colleagues.
If you are unhappy with this final decision or feel this matter is unresolved, you can seek advice with an CTSI Certified Alternative Dispute Resolution provider. We are prepared to engage with The Motor Ombudsman to resolve your dispute. Further details can be found at www.themotorombudsman.org, or alternatively their telephone number is 0345 241 3008 selecting option 1.
Yours sincerely
Paddy Byrne
Customer Service UK
Mercedes-Benz UK Customer Service can be contacted by telephone on 008 009 777 7777 or 0207 660 9993, Monday - Friday between 08:00 & 18:00.
Mercedes-Benz Customer Assistance Center Maastricht N.V. Gelissendomein 5, 6229 GK Maastricht , Netherlands. Register No.: K.v.K. Limburg 33014909
If you are not the addressee please inform us immediately that you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete it. We thank you for your support.
Mercedes-Benz collects and processes your personal data as necessary for the provision of our services.
If you would like to know more about your general privacy rights, we refer you to the privacy statement on the following website: www.mercedes-benz.co.uk
[ACTIVITY ID:1-BYU0C0U][CASE ID:1-BWFS3AM]
#72
Junior Member
By trying to make things go away , they just got more into hole . https://www.law360.com/benefits/arti...emissions-deal Now Judge wants to know how did they cheat heheheh and why they are paying 19 million , what for?
#73
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,080
Received 1,735 Likes
on
1,384 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Article will not show without leaving them some money.
#74
Senior Member
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes
on
52 Posts
2012 ML350 Bluetec, 2015 GL350 Bluetec
Well no offense to you, but I don't think this statement has any ground. Older diesel Benzes emit MUCH MUCH more pollutant than the bluetec. The reason that they are cheating on emission is because the EPA regulation on the emission is UNREASONABLE. Just like when you are having an exam and normally the pass line is 60 points. However if the teacher sets the pass line to 95 points or 100 points, then students are going to cheat for sure.