E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

My CLK320 seems faster than my E500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-18-2009, 12:56 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
cmykdesign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
05' E500 Sport, 01' CLK 320
My CLK320 seems faster than my E500

I haven’t driven my clk320 in about 5 months but for some reason today it felt like it was so much faster than my everyday driven E500 (0-35mph). I know the body is heavier but could it really be that much slower because of that? Both have automatic transmission. I bought the CLK with about 5k miles from a NASCAR mechanic in North Carolina so I wonder if he did anything to the engine...


Also, it seems that I can turn sharper in the CLK than in the E class. A few weeks ago I was making an illegal u-turn in the E class and had to reverse or eat the curb as traffic was coming.. The CLK would have cleared it, for sure.
Old 04-18-2009, 04:36 AM
  #2  
Member
 
CLEK500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CLK500, E500, SC400
CLK is based on c-class frame, so wheel base is shorter, that why you can make u-turn easier, but faster??? nah
Old 04-18-2009, 05:18 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
cmykdesign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
05' E500 Sport, 01' CLK 320
but faster??? nah
lol... I swear by it! At least from 0-35. I drive the E500 everyday and I dont get that kind of power in take off as I do in the CLK.

Old 04-18-2009, 05:47 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
QuadBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 1,419
Received 84 Likes on 55 Posts
BMW, Tesla, Mercedes, Porsche, Cadillac
Originally Posted by cmykdesign
lol... I swear by it! At least from 0-35. I drive the E500 everyday and I dont get that kind of power in take off as I do in the CLK.

Either that nascar guy did something to the CLK, or there's something wrong with your E500.
Old 04-21-2009, 04:02 AM
  #5  
Member
 
shaunls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 E500 sport
e500 should be a good bit quicker.
Old 04-21-2009, 04:26 AM
  #6  
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Either the E500 has something majorly wrong with it, or your butt-o-meter is simply fooling you. Lighter, more nimble cars tend to feel quicker than larger, heavier, more luxuriously geared and riding cars. Sometimes peppy smaller engines "feel" quicker than bigger V8's as they rev more freely and have a bit more jolt during acceleration.

I dunno how much lighter a CLK is than an E, but the E320 my mom used to have felt slow as molasses.

Also, the E is a bigger car, so simply put, the smaller CLK will be able to clear U-Turns easier due to that fact.
Old 04-21-2009, 09:56 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
M-bENZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Corrolla
hell no CLK is should be faster than your E500 lol j/k the E should be faster than the CLK you are comparing V6 with V8. U just have to check your V8 thou.

Andy
Old 04-21-2009, 02:31 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Eich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 391
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2010 ML350 GAS 4Matic
Originally Posted by K-A
Lighter, more nimble cars tend to feel quicker than larger, heavier, more luxuriously geared and riding cars. Sometimes peppy smaller engines "feel" quicker than bigger V8's as they rev more freely and have a bit more jolt during acceleration.
BINGO ! That's exactly it.

I have experienced this effect on more than one type of car. But I'm certain that if you raced your CLK 320 with your E500, the E would win easily over any distance.

Another good test - from a very slow speed - smash the gas pedal to the floor with both cars up to a good speed. The E's acceleration should feel more agressive in this case.
Old 04-21-2009, 05:06 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaazmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,003
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
Originally Posted by Eich
BINGO ! That's exactly it.

I have experienced this effect on more than one type of car. But I'm certain that if you raced your CLK 320 with your E500, the E would win easily over any distance.

Another good test - from a very slow speed - smash the gas pedal to the floor with both cars up to a good speed. The E's acceleration should feel more agressive in this case.
Ya, I've experience this too. When I had a C350 it "felt" faster than our CL500, but I know that is no where near the truth.
Old 04-22-2009, 12:54 AM
  #10  
Member
Thread Starter
 
cmykdesign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
05' E500 Sport, 01' CLK 320
Thanks for the feedback.. I think it must be the "feeling" from the peppy small engine. I thought it was really strange, thats all..
Old 04-22-2009, 11:57 AM
  #11  
155
Super Member
 
155's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 2 star town
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
R350
On a side note... the E has one of the best turning radius of a car I've ever driven. And BTW, your butt dyno needs to be re-calibrated!
Old 04-22-2009, 01:17 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaazmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,003
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
Originally Posted by 155
On a side note... the E has one of the best turning radius of a car I've ever driven.
Ya, my friends are always impressed with the turning radius of the car.
Old 04-23-2009, 01:36 AM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
cmykdesign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
05' E500 Sport, 01' CLK 320
Ya, my friends are always impressed with the turning radius of the car.
On a side note... the E has one of the best turning radius of a car I've ever driven.
Really?? In the CLK I can be at a complete stand still and turn around without eating the curb. I tried doing that in the E500 and its not like that, at all..
Old 04-23-2009, 04:34 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaazmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,003
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
Originally Posted by cmykdesign
Really?? In the CLK I can be at a complete stand still and turn around without eating the curb. I tried doing that in the E500 and its not like that, at all..
Obviously the CLK has a better turning radius since it is based off the C-class, which has a really good turning radius.
Old 04-26-2009, 10:17 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
LB Bnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07 E350, 03 Lexus ES300, 04 CLK 320 (gone)
LOL...I think the 'sportiness' of the CLK is what you're feeling...whereas the Eclass is telling you comfort....speaking of which, the E500 may be set in 'C' mode....

....it would be nice if the former owner of the CLK put a 'supercharger' in there

v6 vs. v8
Old 04-26-2009, 09:38 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
MercFiveHundred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 418
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
2014 E550; 2003 E500
The E500 has wider gears and that may be why the CLK320 feels faster? At 80mph the CLK320 is at 3000+ RPM (peak torque), while the e500 is at about 2500RPM. I drove both and the CLK is definitely not faster, but has a sportier feel. Highway speeds it may be close, but off the line, the E500 will kill it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: My CLK320 seems faster than my E500



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 AM.