E320 4Matic Sedan (W211) Acceleration
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: New Brunswick, NJ
2011 C300 4Matic Sport
E320 4Matic Sedan (W211) Acceleration
We're closing a lease on a 2005 E320 4Matic Sedan, and are very confident with every aspect of the vehicle besides the performance of the 3.2 liter V6. We know Mercedes has used this unit in many applications for quite a few years, however we're concerned with the modest 220 horsepower rating. We also heard from a few different sources that the 4Matic system does slow the vehicle down to a bit compared to the RWD E320. We test drove the vehicle, but didn't really enough time to really get to know the motor's capacities.
Any insight on the performance of this engine mated the 4Matic system, especially during highway driving, would be very much so appreciated.
PS - I read through earlier posts and noticed that MB has plans for an E350. Is it worth the wait? I hope not since we're so excited to receive this vehicle!
Any insight on the performance of this engine mated the 4Matic system, especially during highway driving, would be very much so appreciated.
PS - I read through earlier posts and noticed that MB has plans for an E350. Is it worth the wait? I hope not since we're so excited to receive this vehicle!
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 429
Likes: 1
From: New York Area
'14 E350 wagon; BMW G12 (2020) G01 (2019)
Originally Posted by cbh2
We're closing a lease on a 2005 E320 4Matic Sedan, and are very confident with every aspect of the vehicle besides the performance of the 3.2 liter V6. We know Mercedes has used this unit in many applications for quite a few years, however we're concerned with the modest 220 horsepower rating. We also heard from a few different sources that the 4Matic system does slow the vehicle down to a bit compared to the RWD E320. We test drove the vehicle, but didn't really enough time to really get to know the motor's capacities.
Any insight on the performance of this engine mated the 4Matic system, especially during highway driving, would be very much so appreciated.
PS - I read through earlier posts and noticed that MB has plans for an E350. Is it worth the wait? I hope not since we're so excited to receive this vehicle!
Any insight on the performance of this engine mated the 4Matic system, especially during highway driving, would be very much so appreciated.
PS - I read through earlier posts and noticed that MB has plans for an E350. Is it worth the wait? I hope not since we're so excited to receive this vehicle!
Almost a Member!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
W211 E320 4Matic
Perceived vehicle acceleration is different to just about everyone. The 320 engine produces substantial torque and horsepower and is one of the larger engines that is offered world wide by mercedes. The difference in engine performance adding 4 matic is not something that you would likely be able to discriminate in a blind test without measuring devices. In all applications the car has more than sufficient power. From a rolling start there is impressive acceleration without any noteworthy drop off right up through autobahn speeds. If you are focused on pure straight line timed runs, or place high value in a larger engine for sound or performance than you will always regret a decision to get anything else. Get what you want and avoid regrets, the cost will soon become a distant memory. After 4000 miles, with 1300 across germany during european delivery, I would purchase the same engine again.
Almost a Member!
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
I have a 2004 E320 4matic.I could use a few extra H.P....I use the electronic transmission to manually down gear to get that the extra "kick"....
2004 E320 4Matic,Parktronic, wood wheel, 4 Zone Climate Control(standard in Canada),HK Sound System ,BiXenon Hd.Lights
2004 E320 4Matic,Parktronic, wood wheel, 4 Zone Climate Control(standard in Canada),HK Sound System ,BiXenon Hd.Lights
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, CA
2003 E-500
You don't mention where you live. If you drive in the mountains or live at a high altitude, I would recommend you get an E-500. I had an E-320 and found it lacking in acceleration and passing ability at altitude or in the mountains. At sea level for free way driving, the 320 is OK but not steller. If you can afford it, go for the E-500 and enjoy the better suspension, A/C and brakes along with the higher power.
Trending Topics
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 293
Likes: 214
From: GA
‘24 Maserati GranTurismo Trofeo;'22 AMG SL55;'23 Porsche Cayenne S Coupe;'13 Porsche Boxster S
Having owned both a 2003 RWD E320 w211, and a 2004 4matic E320 w211, I can tell you that the difference in acceleration is negligible. The dealer told me that if I was satisfied with the RWD E320's acceleration, then I would be happy with the 4matic E320. He was right. No doubt, the E500 is much faster, but for me the E320 was fast enough (fyi, I love to drive fast). Don't forget to order the Appearance Package and the Drive Dynamic seats (by far the best options I've had on any of my cars).
Super Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Warren, NJ
'05 E320 CDI;'04 S2k;'94 Supra TT;'10 QX56;'38 Buick;98 Port City Offset Late Model
There is some information that the E350 may be as early as December '04 production. The 4Matic would likely be available at the same time.
I don't like the current V6 engine for a variety of reasons. Even with RWD, it seemed slow to me. At the redline, where you need to send it to get any real power, it is nowhere near as smooth as its BMW and Japanese competition.
There is also talk of a new diesel, a V6 with 231hp (vs the current diesel's 201hp) for June '05 production. The V6 configuration would probably enable creating a 4Matic version. The current diesel seems quicker than the V6 gas, not because it has more power, but because it is quieter when it generates it (4600 rpm redline and more sound insulation). It also has a fatter torque curve, generating over 190hp over a 1200 or so rpm range.
Net...unless I HAD to get one now, I would wait for the new V6.
Exception to the rule: an in-stock E500 since that would still have the carbon filter and enough power.
I don't like the current V6 engine for a variety of reasons. Even with RWD, it seemed slow to me. At the redline, where you need to send it to get any real power, it is nowhere near as smooth as its BMW and Japanese competition.
There is also talk of a new diesel, a V6 with 231hp (vs the current diesel's 201hp) for June '05 production. The V6 configuration would probably enable creating a 4Matic version. The current diesel seems quicker than the V6 gas, not because it has more power, but because it is quieter when it generates it (4600 rpm redline and more sound insulation). It also has a fatter torque curve, generating over 190hp over a 1200 or so rpm range.
Net...unless I HAD to get one now, I would wait for the new V6.
Exception to the rule: an in-stock E500 since that would still have the carbon filter and enough power.
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 783
Likes: 1
From: Murrieta, Southern California
Late Built 2005 W-211 E-320 CDI
New diesel talk?
Originally Posted by DavidNJ
There is also talk of a new diesel, a V6 with 231hp (vs the current diesel's 201hp) for June '05 production. The V6 configuration would probably enable creating a 4Matic version. The current diesel seems quicker than the V6 gas, not because it has more power, but because it is quieter when it generates it (4600 rpm redline and more sound insulation). It also has a fatter torque curve, generating over 190hp over a 1200 or so rpm range.
Wondering where you read about this? Size of this new engine?
Will it be soon or perhaps that's why you aren't waiting?
Super Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Warren, NJ
'05 E320 CDI;'04 S2k;'94 Supra TT;'10 QX56;'38 Buick;98 Port City Offset Late Model
My lease is already up.The 530 goes away this month. We really wanted to wait and see how this all shakes out this year: new Audi A6 with FSI engines, new MB engines, new BMW engines, revised '06 MB (probably May-June '05), upgrades to 5 series, new Cadillac STS, new Infiniti M45, new Lexus GS300/430, new Acura RL, revised Jaguar S-type (diesel?).
However we really can't wait. Considered Acura TL or Toyota Prius as interim cars. Gave up on both for various issues. Also looked at and more quickly rejected Chrylser 300, Infiniti G35, Cadillac CTS, various Volvos, etc.
These new engines and a link to what appear to be an authoritative German site are in another thread.
P.S.
Info on current engine is my own analysis.
However we really can't wait. Considered Acura TL or Toyota Prius as interim cars. Gave up on both for various issues. Also looked at and more quickly rejected Chrylser 300, Infiniti G35, Cadillac CTS, various Volvos, etc.
These new engines and a link to what appear to be an authoritative German site are in another thread.
P.S.
Info on current engine is my own analysis.
