W211 or W210
Is all the moaning I hear about bad reliability and quality of the 211 simply a matter of the first year's manufacturing startup foo-pa's that most manufacturers have? Have the problems in the 03s been resolved in the 04's?
Is too much technology a bad thing? Just more things to break?
Is a tried-and-true W210 a better purchase because most bugs have been shaken out?
I'm buying this car to commute and shuttle a family of five around to soccer games and city events. What I enjoy the most about a car are: heated seats, sunroof, safety, V-6 and all wheel drive. I'm not a gearhead, so in the shop it will go when work is required. I'm driving a Toyota Avalon now and the E is pretty much the same form factor inside and out. It's the perfect size for me. I bought 1st years production of the Avalon without hesitation because they always keep their eyes on the quality ball. Sure enough, no probs.
So what's the skinny? Is the 210 a more reliable and better quality machine than the 211, gadgets aside?
Last edited by Billski; Oct 3, 2004 at 03:28 PM.
Is all the moaning I hear about bad reliability and quality of the 211 simply a matter of the first year's manufacturing startup foo-pa's that most manufacturers have? Have the problems in the 03s been resolved in the 04's?
Is too much technology a bad thing? Just more things to break?
Is a tried-and-true W210 a better purchase because most bugs have been shaken out?
I'm buying this car to commute and shuttle a family of five around to soccer games and city events. What I enjoy the most about a car are: heated seats, sunroof, safety, V-6 and all wheel drive. I'm not a gearhead, so in the shop it will go when work is required. I'm driving a Toyota Avalon now and the E is pretty much the same form factor inside and out. It's the perfect size for me. I bought 1st years production of the Avalon without hesitation because they always keep their eyes on the quality ball. Sure enough, no probs.
So what's the skinny? Is the 210 a more reliable and better quality machine than the 211, gadgets aside?
If esthetics mean ANYTHING at all to you get an '04. The 211's simply look much better from the outside, and are light years ahead on the interior. Light Years ahead.
When you check out the geneology of the E it is immediately apparent that the 210 was the "bridge" car that made the change from the OLD large steering wheeled, squarish, tank like MB's, to todays smart looking fluid design.
My dad has a 210 in Brilliant Silver/Black. I would NEVER have bought that car new. I don't think it has any attractive features about it. None. To me it feels like a commercial vehicle. ...1 wiper arm? Hah! ...and the radio? simply horrid sounding!
(I hope this icon is polite??)We quite liked our 210, at the time there was nothing better. The 5 series estate was 'titchy' and lacked the power of the 320CDI, but if you can afford the 211 then go for it. A much better vehicle.
Regards,
John
Night-time in Torquay
Anecdotal reliability results: Our early-production W211 has had no significant problems in over one year and 10,000 miles of driving. The dealer applied a software patch to fix a common audio problem and did something to correct spurious "malfunction messages", and that's about it.
You can judge the esthetics of the two cars for yourself, but to me, if the W210 was a bit larger, it could be the shipping crate for a W211.
To me, the W210 lacks in insulation from the road, resulting in tons of road noise. On the highway, you can barely hear the radio because of all the whooshing and pitter patter from the tires, and the ride is very jiggly and boomy. My mom has a 2000 E320, going on trips in it is very annoying and it's next to impossible to fall asleep in the back seat because of all the noise. As for wind noise,there's only a slight rustle at the windshield at freeway speed.
The W211 definitely has less noise from the road, but it's still there. The ride is still on the firm side, but the chassis is very rigid and doesn't jiggle or boom like the 210. When you're on the freeway, there's some wind noise at the side windows, but barely enough to notice.
If you're going to get the 211, don't get a 2003, they worked out some of the Sensotronic Brake Control problems, and other little problems for 2004.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
You were offered a new adequately equipped 05 Lexus LS430 or BMW 530I as an even swap (no out of pocket costs including sales tax & registration/title fees) for your current w211 would you do it? And if so, what would be your first and foremost priority going in?
You were offered a new adequately equipped 05 Lexus LS430 or BMW 530I as an even swap (no out of pocket costs including sales tax & registration/title fees) for your current w211 would you do it? And if so, what would be your first and foremost priority going in?
B.T.W. My 04 e500 has been absoutly flawless so far (nearlly 10,000 miles on the clock).
That said, I'm willing to forego some amount of Japanese reliability for prestige. I have to agree that the new styling is sure more attractive.
So you think the 210 is noiser than the 211? I've notice on most new cars that as the rubber gaskets begin to harden with age (+2 years) that the wind noise, particularly around the door is much more noticable.
I'm a bit disappointed to hear the back seat is smaller. As my kids have now become teens an are as tall as adults, 3 of them in the back could be an issue.
Kick *** car! Not nearly as good looking as the W211 though.
I drive a pretty early '03 E320 and I love the looks of the car and the star on the hood has an undeniable appeal - but if reliability is the paramount concern - buy a Lexus.

I would under no circumstances own this car without a warranty. Way too many little things have gone wrong already - I cringe at the thought of what it would cost to repair big stuff out of warranty
Last edited by lig; Oct 4, 2004 at 02:18 AM.
A friend of mine had a 2002 W210 and had all sorts of issues with it - couldn't wait to dump it. (He bought a 2004 XJ8 this summer - that's another story!). I really hate to say this, but if style and form make no difference, then you may be better off looking to the "west" rather than "east". (That's as close as I can come to mentioning the competition from across the Pacific!!).
I used the W210 E320 for 3 years , 38000km. Zero break down.
The only part replaced was the air cond tube.
I 'don't believe' the W211 is less reliable.
If you can find a preowned 2001 E320 W210 mileage ~80000km and three times cheaper than the W211, get the W210 as your first MB, you will enjoy it.
Then, upgrade to the W211 two years later.
If you find a E430 W210, even be better for family.
But the 2001 W210 facelift has much better interior.
cnt
... if you have a little spare cash lying about, why not go for the W211? It's interior is much plusher and better built (according to owners of both W210 & W211 cars) and, in my particular case, the W211's Kompressor engine uses a better technology than the old W210's. But since you're going for the E320, I don't suppose the engine would be an issue
.Good luck with your decision - both choices are good cars
.



