Uh oh...New Generation 5er
Honestly, the W212 just isn't a nice enough car for me to ever buy, and if I'm not hot on it now, I can imagine how I'll feel in a few years. Unless I needed a good DD in the next few years, I'd consider one, as of course it's a great, solid, comfy, and safe car, but I need to like looking at what I drive.
I'm not a brand fan-boy, I've HATED BMW the past 7 years, now they release something well designed, so I give credit where it's due. M-B messed up the E-Class, at least for my tastes of course, so I also give criticism where it's due.
I don't post on the 211 Boards because I already know what I need to know about the car, and I don't come on a Car Forum to only have praising pow-wows.
Having owned a BMW for the past 3 years, you don't find prior vintage owners on the e60forum ragging on the e60. There may be e60 owners (or potential owners) discussing problems or negative issues about the car but what is served by an e39 owner constantly posting about how much (any why) they don't like the e60.
I'm not saying that everything on the W212 site should be positive. What emilner is going through with his car is very negative but is totally appropriate for the site. There's good and bad in every car and all should be discussed. Repetitive negative posts by someone who doesn't even own the car just somehow doesn't compute for me. One or two to express you opinion - fine. Ongoing negative comments just seem to be somewhat "in your face". Just my $0.02.
I'm really curious to see the 5 irl.
BUt ofcourse looks are objective and to each its own..
Attachment 170942
Attachment 170943
Attachment 170944
Attachment 170945
IMO the Benz is so much more sexier and athletic looking. The front end of the BENZ absolutley blows away the ugly flat nose of the 5er.. The side view of the 5er is like a 3 series, same lines where as the new E has distinct lines and the arched rear panel which separates it self from the C. Ive grown to love the tails of the new E. Hey what can I say, I wouldnt have paid the $$$ if I didnt love the car. Most impressively the new E handles! and if you want to cruise,set it in C and ride on clouds.
Having owned a BMW for the past 3 years, you don't find prior vintage owners on the e60forum ragging on the e60. There may be e60 owners (or potential owners) discussing problems or negative issues about the car but what is served by an e39 owner constantly posting about how much (any why) they don't like the e60.
I'm not saying that everything on the W212 site should be positive. What emilner is going through with his car is very negative but is totally appropriate for the site. There's good and bad in every car and all should be discussed. Repetitive negative posts by someone who doesn't even own the car just somehow doesn't compute for me. One or two to express you opinion - fine. Ongoing negative comments just seem to be somewhat "in your face". Just my $0.02.




I really like how new 5 series looks and I don't mind it looks the same like 3 series from the side ( at least on a pic ). I'm sure in person 5 will look amazing, but MB has its own nice spots ...
Anyway...whoever can afford to drive any of those brand new models are lucky guys .....enjoy it.....
Last edited by aeggroup; Dec 1, 2009 at 04:19 PM.
Having owned a BMW for the past 3 years, you don't find prior vintage owners on the e60forum ragging on the e60. There may be e60 owners (or potential owners) discussing problems or negative issues about the car but what is served by an e39 owner constantly posting about how much (any why) they don't like the e60.
I'm not saying that everything on the W212 site should be positive. What emilner is going through with his car is very negative but is totally appropriate for the site. There's good and bad in every car and all should be discussed. Repetitive negative posts by someone who doesn't even own the car just somehow doesn't compute for me. One or two to express you opinion - fine. Ongoing negative comments just seem to be somewhat "in your face". Just my $0.02.
I think the new 5 is far more athletic looking, and sexy than the 212 without comparison, but to each their own. I think the 212 is meaner looking, more "mature" in the sense that I think people of a more mature age would be more interested in it (however that's mostly just an M-B VS BMW thing), polarizing, staunch, "solid/tank-like" inspiring, etc.
Last edited by K-A; Dec 1, 2009 at 04:12 PM.
Congrats on the new whip though. You really changed characters with these cars, lol. Went from a white 211, which is just an elegant, classy and almost "sensuous" car, to a black W212, which is a masculine, relatively imposing (from the front) approach.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Also, the lines on the side of the 3 and 5 are not in any way "identical", the 212 and 204 have the same downward crease on the doors, in fact, every M-B has them, the 212's is just far boxier and straight-cut than the others. The rear hump is unique, but that's very much a love it or hate it thing, and the rear is also unique, but the worst in M-B's model family. So I think we can all point out similarities between the families.
I can point out many lines and differences with the 3 and 5 that you or I can between the 204 and 212. Frankly I think 212 fans just throwing a cheap shot at the car. In person, I guarantee you will notice the 5's presence over the 3.
Of course BMW has always seemed to have much more (overt) similarity in their designs than MB does in theirs. It really seemed like they made three mostly identical cars, just of varying size. For some reason the style worked well in the 3 (until recently) and somewhat in the 7, but it never worked as well for me in the 5.
After looking at 220S's pictures, I'd say the 212 looks more like the S-class than the C-class.
The similarities between the 204 and 212 are nowhere near those of the 3 and 5 Series or 203 and 211. Unless of course you ignore the front and back. I'm not really sure it's worth arguing about, though, as you clearly have different views than I. I feel like I'm reading Skip Bayless write about Mercedes.
The F10 is supposed to set the bar yet again handling wise, it'll be no contest VS the E in terms of spirited/Sport driving, I'm hoping it'll be a bit Luxurious as well.
Of course BMW has always seemed to have much more (overt) similarity in their designs than MB does in theirs. It really seemed like they made three mostly identical cars, just of varying size. For some reason the style worked well in the 3 (until recently) and somewhat in the 7, but it never worked as well for me in the 5.
After looking at 220S's pictures, I'd say the 212 looks more like the S-class than the C-class.
The similarities between the 204 and 212 are nowhere near those of the 3 and 5 Series or 203 and 211. Unless of course you ignore the front and back. I'm not really sure it's worth arguing about, though, as you clearly have different views than I. I feel like I'm reading Skip Bayless write about Mercedes.I think the E looks like a cross between the 204 and 221 with its own elements, in fact I think the 204 resembles a mini 221 in some ways, which it's supposed to.... That's how M-B will sell them well.
The 3 isn't my cup of tea neither, but it's a winning design Sales-wise (absolutely slaughters the newer W204 in Sales), not that that means anything in the definitive "nice car/nice design" way, or in a car enthusiasts sense, but obviously BMW doesn't see it resembling a 3 as a bad thing.
All I have to say is, when pics of the 212 were launched people were short of vomiting, including some buyers of it now, many negative aspects were pointed out. Naturally, as it's an M-B, people will accept it, and as it's a new car, people will naturally change their opinions as if they're in the market and want a Benz, they gotta learn to like it, and it's polarizing/controvertial-ish, so you have haters and lovers.
Hard to really point out design flaws on the 5, if "bigger 3-Series" is all the nay-sayers can come up with, it's already way ahead of the 212. Once we see it on the road and get BMW's full idea and its presence, it'll be a whole new ballgame.
Last edited by K-A; Dec 1, 2009 at 05:57 PM.
I'm not saying the 212 and 204 looking "alike" is a bad thing, my point is this is done on purpose by car manufacturers, which is why they call it "design language", M-B has even spoken about how the 212 now completes the new design theme.
I can point out many lines and differences with the 3 and 5 that you or I can between the 204 and 212. Frankly I think 212 fans just throwing a cheap shot at the car. In person, I guarantee you will notice the 5's presence over the 3
.A BMW rep on another Message board stated that the EU Regs have really messed up the front designs of all Euro cars, as the older models had a lot more freedom to be designed according to how the designers felt they should look. BMW has succumbed to this. He however stated that M-B was willing to spend TONS of R&D money on the 212 (on the raising bonnet when hitting a pedestrian, etc.) to allow it to pass regulations, however still have at least a slight slant to the grille (it is a lot more flat than the outgoing model, but they made it look purposeful well). Also as you notice, all new Euro cars (especially the 212) have VERY low sloping hoods, I don't really like the look too much, but aside from that, it just CAN'T be safe for American streets with high SUVS that can literally just go right over.
He also stated that cars like the W204 C-Class don't get that $$ R&D treatment, so they work with the blunt face, which actually works with the Star grille, but looks terrible and awkward with the "Luxury" grille.
My eyes just can't make sense of the 212's front enough for me to like it, and I find it, namely the headlights to be non-harmonious, however, I do think it has a striking effect in the right angles, and doubtlessly most people will find it more interesting to look at than the 5's, at least initially (I think the 5's will age better).




, but I think plenty of people (in this thread) have pointed out flaws in the new 5. Just as you point out flaws in the 212 and people point out flaws in the 211 and everything other car. If you ask enough people you'll find there are flaws in every design. It's all a matter of perspective.
What I was saying though, is when the 212 was first leaked, 99% of the comments were hugely negative, the 5's is far far more positive, obviously an M-B Board will have its opinions, but even here most Threads on the 5 are a lot more positive than how people viewed the 212 on for example, a BMW Board. On other Boards, the car is also receiving a much more positive reception than the 212 did.
Again, to each their own, design is subjective, and all I can do is preach my views on it.
I'm just really happy that in this day and age of "transformer" like, puzzling vehicles, BMW lashes out at the preposterous trend they started (EVERYONE is copying them, including M-B, they re-revolutionized car design with the hideous Bangle era) and goes back to creating a very pure, smooth, and "organic" design.
What will be interesting is if BMW shot themselves in the foot by going too extreme, then obviously with no where to go after that, and going back to simplicity and refining their quirky designs, will people still be on board?
Not really, but something tells me if I ever got myself to be able to actually study my **** off long enough to pass the bar I'd make a decent one.







