Test drove a Panamera today....
The one I drove was just a V6 300 HP model, very lightly Optioned, for a healthy $86+K. Seeing my car next to it, just made it apparent that the cheaper car looked much nicer to me. Inside, I really like the Panny, and the seats are incredible. My favorite part is the classic Porsche speedo, it's like the same unit they used in the 80's, and that's a GOOD thing, it brings back all these childhood emotions of "dream car" proportions.
The V6 feels much more powerful than 300 HP in such a hefty car would allude. It has some nice bottom end, but even more throttle lag and lethargy then the soft-engineered M-B pedal (my E actually felt rather peppy when I got back into it). Also, the ride was decent, but it wasn't as smooth or quiet as the E (obviously handling was a bit better, but again, the car feels very large). The interior has a nice sense of occasion, however I did notice some fit and finish issues (probably exclusive to this particular car?), and getting back into my E didn't feel like I was getting into anything lessor really, just felt like I was getting back into a proper Benz.
All in all, I would love to have a Panamera, and with some mods, I could really come around to that design fully. I guess my final conclusion of the regular Panamera VS my E, is that I wouldn't pay the extra coin for the Panny, especially since I'm not sure if I'd spend equal coin for it as I do my E (pretending that the prices were the same to begin with, I'd probably choose the E based on exterior styling alone). A Panamera Turbo would be right on though.... Sat in one, and I think it was $160K.
Rear seats had more leg room than my E.
Again, the styling is a bit off.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Being 6'5 and a Safety paranoid who likes bigger cars, A Porsche 4-Door should be right up my alley, and I think that's why I've been trying and trying to fall in love with the Panny. Rightly modded I think they can look good, but some angles, and some setups, and when bare-bones, they can look vomit-inducing. Looking at my E that costs a fraction of the price, and it looking like a diamond next to the Panamera, made it hard for me to wonder how one can justify $85+K for a lightly equipped one. I'm no HP freak, hence my contention with an E350, but buying an $85K Porsche with 300 HP is pointless to me, and that's one thing I'm trying to figure out regarding the Panamera.... What do I get or "feel" from that price for this car. Even if it does incorporate Porsche's known black-magic that makes incredibly efficient use in putting that power to the ground.
Damn, dude you're huge!!



Last edited by bigben320e; Aug 6, 2011 at 12:26 AM.
The Panny did have a comfy ride, and the seats are AMAZING, perfect support. However, the same rough road bumps that upset the composure of the W212 Sport also slightly upset the Panny. On the flip side, the Panny actually handles very well when pushed to the limits I'm sure, but I wasn't able to really toss it around much.
P.S. Why do people keep comparing Maserati Quat. to S-class in magazines? Although similar in price, that's not how people shop. The Maserati is in the E- and CLS-class for size/functionality.
PL
Yes the E-Class W212 is the clear winner for it's real 4 door world class act.
Much is the same with the Cayenne. I got V-6's as loaners when my car was in for scheduled maintenance. I was not overly impressed. Then one maintenance visit, the dealer offered a fresh in service Cayenne S, better equipped with options, and my impressions changed which resulted in a purchase.
Driving a nicely featured V-8 might change the impressions, and in a Porsche, there is a premium to go first class.
Last edited by golfster; Aug 6, 2011 at 10:12 AM.
While yes, the E is more practical out of the 3 mentioned, Panamera, CLS, the new CLS does allot for more room in the back and headroom now. I still lean toward the CLS, it is the choice and first out on the "4 door coupe" game. However, for the true 4 door sedan, love the E, my 98 E320 still rolls like a top and looks great.
Even with the new CLS, that has more headroom? I guess you are a giraffe, lol.
While yes, the E is more practical out of the 3 mentioned, Panamera, CLS, the new CLS does allot for more room in the back and headroom now. I still lean toward the CLS, it is the choice and first out on the "4 door coupe" game. However, for the true 4 door sedan, love the E, my 98 E320 still rolls like a top and looks great.
One thing that I've read about the Panny is that the V6 is actually the best handling version of all of them (lightest, less weight up front, and the engine can be pushed further toward the middle of the car). Nothing stuck out to me, but I wasn't able to push the car in the turns.
And I agree with everyone's sentiments here and thanks for the opinions and experiences. I gotta say, the Panny has grown on me BIG TIME, but it's just not "there" for me either, fully, and I don't know if it'll ever be. For a bargain price though, it would be a very attractive buy, if for no other reason than being a part of the Porsche engineered family while getting my height and roominess/non-claustraphobic-valuing and safety obsessed points check off. I just would want to keep the Benz as well.
First, is on the base Panamera's, you don't get the chrome trim surrounding the greenhouse. Now I know that some people prefer black around the greenhouse, and BMW with their "Black Chrome Shadowline" trim has it right on, as that looks great, and rich, but the Panamera's black surrounding the windows is just a cheap, crude, and unfinished looking plastic-rubber. It basically literally looks like how you'd imagine it would if you got a car with chrome window trim, and simply removed it.
Also, on the headlights, the inner lights (I assume parking lights) are a normal halogen bulb, just sitting their in plain view. Compared to the P2 E-Class, that has no halogen bulbs on display up there, and a much nicer/better/cooler looking LED "Projector Ball", it was something that bugged me (I initially noticed it on a $160K Panny as well, lol).









