C class Loaner
The E350 Sport is a sportier more "handling-oriented" ride than the E550, while the E550 goes further into luxury/smooth ride.
The E's ride blows the C's away in everything but bumpy/sporty ride, so I dunno why you'd choose an E if the C's ride is so much more appealing, and you can get it at such a cheaper price.

If you want handling and a nimble small car, it doesn't end at the C, as the 3-Series goes much further. I'm assuming the C has a better balanced ride than the 3 though (comfort and handling).

I think the C handles better cuz of its weight...its very light compared to my 2010 E350. I enjoyed driving it...zipping in and out of lanes which I normally won't do with my E...LMAO!!!

Trending Topics

Getting back into my E felt like ultimate serenity and luxury though.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I do wonder what will happen to E350 coupe sales now that there is the C coupe and with having the same interior design. I think MB should have made the E coupe bigger (E platform?) and a 6 series competitor if they were planning on the C coupe all along.
I test drove the A7 and it had 3 different ride settings and you could feel the car change it's characteristics. It was sweet, I think it's to much for a v6 and I still am not in love with the Rear end.
So I gave back the C today and got a v6 Genesis. It's a very nice car. Not as nice as an E in some respects, but for 20k less it gets you thinking.
About the C Coupe, I really think it's one of the ugliest non-SUV/Trucks in the M-B lineup right now. The proportions are off, since it's a Sedan with a Coupe greenhouse (not to mention, the design is still based off of a 4+ year old design), and the hideously single framed door is.... well.... hideous, as a Coupe should always have a more graceful frame-less door (NOT B-Pillarless, that's something different, but FRAMEless should go without saying). The greenhouse, usually M-B's strong points in power and/or elegance, just looks like a bargain-basement Coupe offering, i.e Accord Coupe (identical greenhouse, and framed door). The framed door even reminds me of an old Pontiac Sunfire. On Sedans, framed doors look great, however, Coupes need frameless.
All in all, I'm pretty unimpressed with it, and feel that even the current (now older) 3-Series Coupe is a much nicer choice. Not to mention, the A5. IMO, M-B's "half-a$$ed" attempt at launching a C-Coupe is behind the competitors. Next gen, when they've had time to properly R&D the design for a 2-Door, it should look more proper, I'd think.
//Rant off.
Last edited by K-A; Nov 3, 2011 at 10:52 PM.
About the C Coupe, I really think it's one of the ugliest non-SUV/Trucks in the M-B lineup right now. The proportions are off, since it's a Sedan with a Coupe greenhouse (not to mention, the design is still based off of a 4+ year old design), and the hideously single framed door is.... well.... hideous, as a Coupe should always have a more graceful frame-less door (NOT B-Pillarless, that's something different, but FRAMEless should go without saying). The greenhouse, usually M-B's strong points in power and/or elegance, just looks like a bargain-basement Coupe offering, i.e Accord Coupe (identical greenhouse, and framed door). The framed door even reminds me of an old Pontiac Sunfire. On Sedans, framed doors look great, however, Coupes need frameless.
All in all, I'm pretty unimpressed with it, and feel that even the current (now older) 3-Series Coupe is a much nicer choice. Not to mention, the A5. IMO, M-B's "half-a$$ed" attempt at launching a C-Coupe is behind the competitors. Next gen, when they've had time to properly R&D the design for a 2-Door, it should look more proper, I'd think.
//Rant off.

It will definitely cannibalize E-Coupe sales though, especially since the interior is pretty much in line with the E Coupes. However, exterior wise, the E-Coupe, while more fussy, is a definitely noticeable Class above the C (size aside).
The launch of the C coupe coincides perfectly with the bottoming out of the E coupe lifecycle.
The launch of the C coupe coincides perfectly with the bottoming out of the E coupe lifecycle.
Agree w/ the other posters that the C-class likely handles subjectively b/c of its smaller size and wt. My impression is that they post pretty similar numbers for handling....
Where do you guys get this stuff from?
The C-Class Coupe didn't have any R&D?
OMG.
M







