Well…. 56k miles and now needs an entire battery
tried the whole lock, unlock, lock, unlock, lock and wait 20 minutes
nothing
got the vehicle towed to dealership and he says
’here’s a loaner, we’re going to have to replace the entire battery, it’s close to a $30k job’
1) WOW, I’ll never drive an EV without warranty. Thank goodness MBUSA has a 150k mile warranty on the battery
2) it’s a bit concerning how unreliable / unusable a car can be when the battery acts up. Like the car is either working or not working, no in between




Trending Topics
tried the whole lock, unlock, lock, unlock, lock and wait 20 minutes
nothing
got the vehicle towed to dealership and he says
’here’s a loaner, we’re going to have to replace the entire battery, it’s close to a $30k job’
1) WOW, I’ll never drive an EV without warranty. Thank goodness MBUSA has a 150k mile warranty on the battery
2) it’s a bit concerning how unreliable / unusable a car can be when the battery acts up. Like the car is either working or not working, no in between
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




What do you think the cost would be to replace an engine in a SL63? Or is that something that ICE cheerleaders don't like to admit or should I say another thing that they are in denial about?
Last edited by MBNUT1; Nov 22, 2024 at 01:21 PM.




Last edited by HBerman; Nov 22, 2024 at 05:54 PM.



And besides, its battery capacity is probably much less than the EQS's 106 kWh. So, you really can't deduce much about the true cost of an EQS's battery from this.
And besides, its battery capacity is probably much less than the EQS's 106 kWh. So, you really can't deduce much about the true cost of an EQS's battery from this.




Last edited by wildta; Nov 23, 2024 at 12:03 PM.
Last edited by MBNUT1; Nov 23, 2024 at 12:00 PM.
And Google tells me this (so EQB is the federal minimum):
- EQB: An 8-year/100,000-mile battery limited warranty
- EQE, EQS, EQE (SUV), and EQS (SUV): A 10-year/155,000-mile battery limited warranty
- Plug-in hybrid models: A high-voltage battery warranty of at least 6 years or 62,000 miles, but may be extended to 10 years or 150,000 miles in some states
- Wet cell batteries: A 48-month/50,000-mile coverage period
Last edited by wildta; Nov 23, 2024 at 12:05 PM.




Besides, this is about saving the planet from global warming and environment catastrophe. The more planet saving subsidies the better. You should be thanking China for saving the planet, not penalizing them with tariffs. Letting the planet go to heck in a handbag because you don't like Chinese people is dumb and racist.
Last edited by MBNUT1; Nov 23, 2024 at 01:29 PM.
They would only be saving the planet according to the alarmists, if they were doing it by accident.
On average they open a new coal fired power plant every 1 to 2 weeks.
They are importing shipfulls of coal from Australia/New Zealand.
They don’t discriminate against high sulfur or dirty coal either.
In large cities in China, there is so much coal dust in the air, citizens were wearing surgical masks long before the rona made them fashionable.
When China hosted the Olympics, they had to suspend operations at their coal fired plants in Beijing to avoid appearing to be enviro bandits.
And what is all this racist pablum?
If you criticize a country for their policies, that makes you racist? That is the most reductive logic possible.
The environmental effects of their battery mining operations alone would never be allowed by the US EPA.
They would only be saving the planet according to the alarmists, if they were doing it by accident.
On average they open a new coal fired power plant every 1 to 2 weeks.
They are importing shipfulls of coal from Australia/New Zealand.
They don’t discriminate against high sulfur or dirty coal either.
In large cities in China, there is so much coal dust in the air, citizens were wearing surgical masks long before the rona made them fashionable.
When China hosted the Olympics, they had to suspend operations at their coal fired plants in Beijing to avoid appearing to be enviro bandits.
And what is all this racist pablum?
If you criticize a country for their policies, that makes you racist? That is the most reductive logic possible.
The environmental effects of their battery mining operations alone would never be allowed by the US EPA.
I also agree with the comment regarding the criticism of a countries policies. That of itself doesn't make you racist or anti-Semitic for that matter.
Last edited by MBNUT1; Nov 23, 2024 at 01:50 PM.
The chart above shows how much CO2 is required to produce a battery in various locations around the world. Too lazy to come up with a weighted average, but using the Jiangsu Province since it produces the largest amount of batteries, the battery production cost is 60 kg/KWh
Ok now let's compare the rate of emissions including the upstream of car, CO2 cost of running an EQS580 vs a SL63. This comes out to 145 vs 666 (devil's number) g / mile.
The EQS580 battery is 108 kWh. It costs 6048 kg of CO2 to produce.
So how long do you have drive before the EQS580 battery pays for itself? At 521 g/mile difference that would be 12000 miles. So even using dirty ole China coal energy batteries, over the life time of the car a big ole EQS is a clear winner in terms of CO2 emissions compared to an SL63.
Last edited by MBNUT1; Nov 23, 2024 at 02:41 PM.







