Mercedes to continue EVA2




That said the data also suggests that BMW has a better strategy because they can probably electrify more of their line up with less capex, and therefore win more overall share.
https://www.coxautoinc.com/wp-conten...les-Report.pdf
And I feel the same way in the opposite direction. That car to me looks like a $50k car, its soft, FWD looking, shocking they are as expensive as they are. Everybody has different tastes, but sales in the end are what matters and the EQS especially just does not sell well. Personally I think the styling os a huge part of that. My dealer no longer even has any EQS sedans in inventory, they are special order or dealer trade only because they are so hard to sell.
Last edited by SW20S; Sep 2, 2024 at 11:28 AM.
As for sales figure, let's compare i7 to EQS in the USA for 2023:
In 2023, ~6,688 EQS sedan vehicles were sold. (https://media.mbusa.com/releases/mer...-sales-q4-2023). How many i7's were sold in 2023?
A total of 10,811 7 series were sold in 2023 (https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/usa/a...language=en_US). Assume that 43% of the 7 series sold were i7, (https://www.bmwblog.com/2023/02/15/b...-series-sales/), that would only be 4,648 i7 sold compared to 6,688 EQS sedans.
However, I dug a little deeper and found this site https://www.chinamobil.ru/eng/cars/bmw/i7/sales_usa/ which said only 3,288 i7 were sold. Not sure how reliable these data are since BMW don't seemed to published i7 data that I could find. I love to have someone give me more reliable data on the i7 sales figure for 2023. So far, EQS sedan still outsold i7 in 2023 until further data shows otherwise.
When it comes to things like body style, that is so subjective there is no point in even discussing it. Mercedes was competing with Lucid to make the most aerodynamic car, so physics is what drives the shape of the EQE and EQS sedans and they do win on that measure, being the slipperiest cars out there. If you like the physics, then it is a great design. If you want something else, then those looks are going to be disappointing.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
When it comes to things like body style, that is so subjective there is no point in even discussing it. Mercedes was competing with Lucid to make the most aerodynamic car, so physics is what drives the shape of the EQE and EQS sedans and they do win on that measure, being the slipperiest cars out there. If you like the physics, then it is a great design. If you want something else, then those looks are going to be disappointing.
If MB is actually going to continue with the EVA2 which the EQE/EQS is currently built on, that most likely mean that they need to make more money out of the current tech before moving onto the new architecture. Or it could mean that the new architecture (MB.EA large) is likely not yielding that much more benefit over the existing architecture.
Does this mean that the EQS will likely continue to be its own model and not merge with the S-Class at some later point?
I could write a very long thread about the MB regen which has been discuss bits and pieces here and there. In summary, the technology is AMAZING, and it's a true luxury to be able to select the different regens and have the brake pedal, and the acceleration pedal move and pressurize depending on one's mood, driving style, and varying road and traffic conditions. With only 3 regen modes, it can provide a multitude driving style to the N power. This is the future of regens which I really like the more I use it.








