Battery level is fluctuated when turning on auto start stop
I'm curious about why this happens. I think that when the car is running, the alternator is functioning as well. It seems the auto start-stop system may disconnect the alternator or halt battery charging to assess the battery voltage for stopping the engine. During this time, the voltage fluctuates between the battery's voltage and the alternator's output. This could mean that the start-stop function results in less efficient battery charging and may negatively impact the battery due to frequent short charges. I do not know if AGM battery like short charge or not.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
The topic is controversial, but IMO start/stop accelerates the wear on the battery and starter. Mostly, I just find the feature annoying and of no fuel efficiency benefit to me, so I've permanently disabled it.
Last edited by streborx; Oct 19, 2024 at 09:33 AM.




The dongles worked, but they were essentially single use, whereas the BenzNinja Club membership has been immensely more valuable.
Trending Topics
https://mbworld.org/forums/e-class-w...ii-reader.html describes how to do it with the Launch OBD scanner.
https://mbworld.org/forums/mercedes-...o-dummies.html describes how to do it with Xentry.
I used the Launch scanner method, but prior to that drove for several months with the battery charging sensor disconnected (effective, but admittedly a hack).
Further to the OP's inquiry, there are a variety of parameters that enable or suspend the start/stop function. One is the charge state of the starter battery. There's a current sensor (the one I disconnected) attached to the battery's negative terminal that measures charging current. If the alternator is applying a substantial charge current to the battery -- for instance, after many start/stop cycles in bumper to bumper traffic on the LA freeway -- start/stop is suspended so that the car doesn't stop and then have insufficient battery capacity to start.
JettaRed's comments above are correct -- start/stop scores fuel economy points for manufacturers and is not beneficial to the majority of drivers.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
https://mbworld.org/forums/e-class-w...ii-reader.html describes how to do it with the Launch OBD scanner.
https://mbworld.org/forums/mercedes-...o-dummies.html describes how to do it with Xentry.
I used the Launch scanner method, but prior to that drove for several months with the battery charging sensor disconnected (effective, but admittedly a hack).
Further to the OP's inquiry, there are a variety of parameters that enable or suspend the start/stop function. One is the charge state of the starter battery. There's a current sensor (the one I disconnected) attached to the battery's negative terminal that measures charging current. If the alternator is applying a substantial charge current to the battery -- for instance, after many start/stop cycles in bumper to bumper traffic on the LA freeway -- start/stop is suspended so that the car doesn't stop and then have insufficient battery capacity to start.
JettaRed's comments above are correct -- start/stop scores fuel economy points for manufacturers and is not beneficial to the majority of drivers.
Then there is also this, unplugging the battery sensor, don't recommend it because the car checks the voltage real time with this sensor so if unplugging it, the alternator will run at full all the time and also RPMs at idle will be slightly higher:
https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...tart-stop.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...ngle-plug.html




Fuel savings can actually be significant. They definitely are significant on the EPA test cycle, which is why manufacturers use it.
Start/stop with an ISG doesn't involve any gears, and the tranny doesn't see any stress because it's not involved.
Motor oil's film strength has improved, and interior tolerances are tighter, so there is less drainback and therefore the wear issue is reduced on engines specifying 0WXX or 5WXX. So it's less of an issue than ones specifying 15WXX or 20WXX. Days gone by.
I haven't seen any current data on newer engines that show results similar to decade-old data that shows 5-30% increased wear due to drainback. Have you?
The only thing that's clear from a variety of forums, is that Start /Stop is generally despised (mostley by non-ISG owners).
And that several folks have paid to disable it.
I seldom keep modern cars over 100k miles, so their potential reduction in engine life from 280,000 miles to 220,000 miles isn't an issue for me. I'd add zinc additives if I wanted to be kinder to my bearings.
Plus, my passengers can't tell me when it Starts or Stops. If it were obtrusive, I might be more concerned.
It's a personal preference.
Then there is also this, unplugging the battery sensor, don't recommend it because the car checks the voltage real time with this sensor so if unplugging it, the alternator will run at full all the time and also RPMs at idle will be slightly higher:
https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...tart-stop.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...ngle-plug.html
One of the primary reasons I disabled mine was, prior to knowing the potential for extra wear, was my wife absolutely hated it and asked if something could be done. For a car guy like me, that was being given $5 and let loose in the penny candy store. I always had a nagging fear that the car wouldn't start and be ready to immediately go when pulling out into heavy traffic from a side street. But, as you said, it's a personal preference.
2014 C350
2015 SL400




He's pretty reliable at that, so he gets plenty of invites. He is either not aware of others who provide the same or better services /features, or hides that info.
He makes his diagrams overly complicated so they're difficult to understand. Plus in many cases they're just wrong.
I quit watching him about 2 years ago.
He's in my Scotty Kilmer category.




The ISG provides an entirely different set of advantages.
It provides a 48v system that eliminates belt-driven accessories such as water pump, AC compressor, and suspensions. It also gives immediate throttle response by adding 180 lb-ft of torque, and regenerative braking that saves brake wear
I don't remember any complaints about a failed ISG on the forum.
It makes the car feel like a naturally aspirated car.
And an almost imperceptible start / stop feature.
The ISG provides an entirely different set of advantages.
It provides a 48v system that eliminates belt-driven accessories such as water pump, AC compressor, and suspensions. It also gives immediate throttle response by adding 180 lb-ft of torque, and regenerative braking that saves brake wear
I don't remember any complaints about a failed ISG on the forum.
It makes the car feel like a naturally aspirated car.
And an almost imperceptible start / stop feature.
The ISG provides an entirely different set of advantages.
It provides a 48v system that eliminates belt-driven accessories such as water pump, AC compressor, and suspensions. It also gives immediate throttle response by adding 180 lb-ft of torque, and regenerative braking that saves brake wear
I don't remember any complaints about a failed ISG on the forum.
It makes the car feel like a naturally aspirated car.
And an almost imperceptible start / stop feature.
The ISG provides an entirely different set of advantages.
It provides a 48v system that eliminates belt-driven accessories such as water pump, AC compressor, and suspensions. It also gives immediate throttle response by adding 180 lb-ft of torque, and regenerative braking that saves brake wear
I don't remember any complaints about a failed ISG on the forum.
It makes the car feel like a naturally aspirated car.
And an almost imperceptible start / stop feature.








