Ride and handling of GLK vs C Sedan ???
My wife insists on a good ride so I'm interested in what experience some of you have had in the GLK.
This is the latest I received today from MBUSA regarding the GLK.
<http://www5.mercedes-benz.com/en/tv/the-GLK-2012/>
2. The "trunk" of the GLK wins. It's small, but it is still much more useful than a small sedan. Folding down the rear seat adds a lot of cargo space.
3. Ride is smooth, quiet, comfortable, quiet. Did I mention that the ride is quiet and smooth?
The comparison is really an apples & oranges things. No comparison in my mind.
Wayne
The GLK sits up, and has a heavier feel in the ride. Feels more confident and controlled.
I guess if I wanted a "racer feel" and something I could throw around exit ramps, then I would say the C Class.
But when I get that feeling, I break out my turbo Mustang.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Something else to consider if it is within your realm.




C-Class (c350)
1. very soft, feather like steering on a car and turning radius is smaller than a GLK (wife loves it way too much that she insist of getting one)
2. very very fast for a average driver specially if you floor the gas pedal
3. only good for 2 midsize adults as back seat legroom dissapears if the person sitting on the front seat is around 5'8" to 6'0" tall
4. more nimble, you feel the roads more because of the thinner tires and sporty suspension.
5. looks very nice and classy specially if you get the tenorite gray or black colors.
6. I recommend getting the 4matic as I drove all the trims from C230 to C350 with and without 4matics as loaners and drove them long enough 3-4 days for each car (longest is a fully pimped-out C350 4matic for 1 month) and I can tell the difference between the car with the 4matic and the car without as the 4matic has more control over slippery roads.
7. Interior is nice on the 2012s not the 2011s
8. Somehow I like driving the C350 more than the GLK just because I feel the speed than on a GLK
GLK
1. UTILITARIAN nuff said
2. rides high
3. manly looking (not in red)
4. more usefull space inside and headroom is plenty
5. poor steering wheel feedback (like driving a boat)
6. has a real presence on the road specially with the 20" wheels
7. nice interior (get the black liner)
8. cheaper than a C350
9. very safe
10. insurance is cheaper than a C350
11. eats more petrol than the C350
Both are great vehicles it is only a matter of what your needs are. If you will be carrying more than 2 people or a lot of cargo everytime then the GLK is the vehicle.
The C sedan (even without the sport package) sits much lower to the ground and by nature will have better and flatter handling compared to the taller GLK.
You can compare functionality and looks, but that's about it. A sedan and SUV are two different things.
The C350 is great on the highway with great pick-up and a sportier feel. The GLK350 definitely feels more truck-like, but the higher ride is nice and it's more utilitarian, especially if you have kids.
Happy decision making.....
The utility of the GLK seems great. I have missed my E Wagon and the GLK can mostly fill that void.
We are going to spend the weekend doing a lot of driving around Scottsdale and Phoenix and if we both feel as positive by Monday morning, as we to tonight, I'm sure we will order a 2013 model in white with black leather.
Then, the big question will be how soon we can get delivery.
If I have any changes in my feelings about the car by Monday I will let you know.
Of course, the 2013 should overcome that issue but we simply didn't feel that confident in the GLK.
Thanks again for all the inputs. These forums are really great.
Of course, the 2013 should overcome that issue but we simply didn't feel that confident in the GLK.
Thanks again for all the inputs. These forums are really great.
I was going to say, go for a C63 and sell the idea of a suv to the wife. that way you have a fun car and a car to go to walmart with

that's my setup atm, and we love it!
Massive doesn't come to mind when I drive the GLK. However, we have a different vehicle history.
Good luck.
Wayne
Of course, the 2013 should overcome that issue but we simply didn't feel that confident in the GLK.
Thanks again for all the inputs. These forums are really great.
"Massiveness"?
Maybe you should have driven a GL first for a little perspective...
So, there you have it. Almost "fact".
So, there you have it. Almost "fact".

The big question: Where will the AdBlue tank go? In the spare well a la E-Class sedans thereby removing the spare tire and forcing the dreaded run flat tires on an unwilling public? Or in a properly designed location outside the spare well thus preserving the spare tire? Inquiring minds want to know.
Wayne



GLK massive? Maybe he should have tried this on for size first!
