Years later, how do you feel about your glk?
I am asking this not as an owner myself, but as some one who is very close to making the jump. I have had my eye on the glk250 (mostly because of the fuel economy compared to the 350). Some things I've read have bugged me, but it hasn't seemed to be anything to stop the purchase.

Is this a general consensus in the group?
Another issue is the engine. While the 4 cylinder in the GLC provides plenty of power, it is not as smooth as the 6 cylinder in the GLK. This is especially evident while idling at a stop. Even when the engine was on while stopping in the GLK (i.e., the ECO stop was not in operation), I felt no vibration from the engine. In contrast, there is sometimes uncomfortable vibration from the engine idling during stops in the GLC. (The dealership told me this was “normal” for the 4 cylinder engine)
I also felt the suspension was less stiff in the GLK. Felt less of the road compared to my current GLC. I changed to regular tires from run flats on the GLC, and I still feel more of the road when driving in the GLC compared to the GLK.
The GLK had a spare tire. The GLC comes with run flats and no spare. I prefer having a spare tire.
One thing I liked about the GLK blind spot assist system was that a yellow light would show up in the triangle in the side mirrors when driving below 20 mph to let you know the system was not in operation (it only works above 20 mph). For some reason, MB dropped the yellow warning light for the blind spot assist in the GLC. That is a loss of an important safety feature.
Another feature I miss in the GLK is that the sill at the trunk door was covered in aluminum, which protected it from scratches. The GLC back sill has no such protective covering. The exposed paint will be easy to scratch.
The windshield wipers are noisier on the GLC.
Lastly, the AC came on faster in the GLK.
The GLC does have some benefits. I like the hands-free access to the GLC. Very convenient. The Burmeister sound system is better than the HK in the GLK. The screen in the GLC has a much better resolution. The interior in the GLC is more attractive. The bottle holders in the doors of the GLC are very convenient for storage. Also, while some complain about the touchpad on the GLC 300, I have found it very easy and convenient to use.
I am sorry I made the switch from the GLK to the GLC. I should have purchased the GLK at the end of my lease.
Hope this helps.
Trending Topics
Hopefully it will continue to be great; I'm very impressed with that engine. And BTW, I pull a 3,500lb boat trailer, and it does a phenomenal job (much better than my old Ford Expedition at twice the towing capacity).
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
On my mostly highway commute to work the 250 got 40 mpg, the 350 gets 31-32.
The 350 has more power, accelerates quicker and does not suffer from the minor yet annoying turbo lag when starting out.
The emissions system on the 350 is simpler and I do not need to worry about where I am getting fuel or the quality of the DEF.
Extended warranty cost for the 350 is lower.
Given a choice between the two I would choose the 350 again.
Last edited by MBKLUE; Jun 26, 2017 at 01:20 PM.
In mainly city driving to/from work, it returns 29-31 MPGs.
On the highway, it calculates 40-42 MPGs.
It handles more like a car than an SUV. It runs on the MOE Dunlop run-flats (no spare due to AdBlue tank in trunk where spare would be).
It is optioned almost to the max, only lacking Distronic.
It sounds a bit clackety while warming up (timing advanced) but smooth and suppressed once fully warmed up. In idling it sounds like a napping lion. The torque is nearly instant and does not let up, easily catches most people off-guard off the line.
First road trip coming up soon (Chicago to FL), I will be able to report back more.
We had been looking for awhile until we found it, but we jumped on it once we found it.
I highly recommend it.
I've got 16k miles on mine and she has 21k. Never had a problem with either one.
In mainly city driving to/from work, it returns 29-31 MPGs.
On the highway, it calculates 40-42 MPGs.
It handles more like a car than an SUV. It runs on the MOE Dunlop run-flats (no spare due to AdBlue tank in trunk where spare would be).
It is optioned almost to the max, only lacking Distronic.
It sounds a bit clackety while warming up (timing advanced) but smooth and suppressed once fully warmed up. In idling it sounds like a napping lion. The torque is nearly instant and does not let up, easily catches most people off-guard off the line.
First road trip coming up soon (Chicago to FL), I will be able to report back more.
We had been looking for awhile until we found it, but we jumped on it once we found it.
I highly recommend it.
Have had the GLK about 2 months, have had other Mercs and diesels and this one is the best, same great mpg you are seeing, and our first road trip in it is next week to FLA! It was weird reading your post as it nearly applied exactly to me (except the Chicago part - too cold for us
).
Very grateful for the advice so far on mbworld
Have had the GLK about 2 months, have had other Mercs and diesels and this one is the best, same great mpg you are seeing, and our first road trip in it is next week to FLA! It was weird reading your post as it nearly applied exactly to me (except the Chicago part - too cold for us
).Can't wait to hit the road later today

Enjoy your trip as well and be safe out there




It's quiet and handles way too well (is that possible?) I average 22 mpg on the highway. I'm getting over 70K miles on the Pirelli Asymetrico's ( 20") and well over that on the brake pads. I bought it used with 54K miles on it and haven't changed the pads yet. The only thing I've changed is the battery and regular servicing.
A really great car.
It's quiet and handles way too well (is that possible?) I average 22 mpg on the highway. I'm getting over 70K miles on the Pirelli Asymetrico's ( 20") and well over that on the brake pads. I bought it used with 54K miles on it and haven't changed the pads yet. The only thing I've changed is the battery and regular servicing.
A really great car.
Has anyone taken a 250 that far? I'm hoping the diesel can last that long as well.










