SLK55 vs 997C4S
By 60 i had pulled so my rear bumper was just over 1/2 of a car length ahead of his front bumper...had to shut it down right away due to traffic but it was a great quick kill...
Porsche cites a 0-6 time of 4.6 seconds for the C4S. Mercedes claims the SLK runs 0-62 in 4.9 seconds but various reviewers have clocked 0-60 in as little as 4.5 seconds.
Jangy: I pulled 1/2 car length on ths start as i got a near perfect start and pulled to 1.5 car lengths by 60...i could tell i wasn't going to pull much more...
JMF: I agree with the mftg numbers you quote but per many sources SLK55 does 0-200kmh in 16.8-17.6s, per trackchallenge it does it in 16.8 sec also while a 997S(not C4, which is about .3-.4 sec slower to 60) does it in 16.0 sec...so with a good jump you could hold off a 997s or 997C4S to 120+...
7sp AMG auto is hard to beat, unless the oponent is a very skilled driver.
From a roll, it would be a bit different.. The P cars really like to run.
7sp AMG auto is hard to beat, unless the oponent is a very skilled driver.
From a roll, it would be a bit different.. The P cars really like to run.
Good kill Falco!
-Matt
Trending Topics
I have been practicing modulating my burnouts(can modulate first gear between 5 and 6k now for about 3 car lengths then 2nd for another 2 or 3 carlengths!!!) as i try to burn off the tires in <6k miles...almost there!!! I think this practice in modulatiing has helped with my dig starts...i got basically a perfect jump and just a hint of wheel spin through first but ZERO triangle flash!!! this gave me 1 length on the guy that i pulled to 1.5 or so by 60...
One of the best runs ive had!!!
Last edited by Falco; Jun 28, 2006 at 01:39 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I recently lined up against an SLK55 at the lights, I fluffed my start allowing him to pull almost 2 car lengths at the start, we were then level to about 80mph and was starting to gain a little before a fixed speed camera made us shut-down. The 1st-2nd gearchange for the slk was especially impressive seeming to take no time at all.
I was 4 up in the 911, he was 2 up.
i need a 996tt
road & track timed the 997 c4s at 4.1 0-60, 10.5 0-100 and 12.6 @ 110.2 in the 1/4
nice launch, looking at the numbers, thats what saved u
eric,
when are we meeting up for a cyn. run? its been awhile, lets get together and do some driving
road & track timed the 997 c4s at 4.1 0-60, 10.5 0-100 and 12.6 @ 110.2 in the 1/4
nice launch, looking at the numbers, thats what saved u
eric,
when are we meeting up for a cyn. run? its been awhile, lets get together and do some driving


.....all I could say I put the money on the C6.........SLK55 feel very fast but on the paper it not that good...... alot of wheel spin that what make the slk55 feel fast..... I race with my friend SLK55......and he lost.......

An SLK55 runs a 12.7 sec quarter mile & traps 111 mph. The C4S runs just a hair slower (drivers race really) with a 12.9 sec quarter trapping 110 mph.And no, a C5 is not going to pull an SLK55 (you mentioned any N/A AMG 5.5L powerplant), nor is a C6 (an MN6 is pretty even, but traps a bit faster than the SLK55). A C5 ZO6 or a C6 ZO6 will pull an SLK55 (the C6Z will absolutely rape it - its a mid 11 sec car & traps 127 mph).
-Matt
An SLK55 runs a 12.7 sec quarter mile & traps 111 mph. The C4S runs just a hair slower (drivers race really) with a 12.9 sec quarter trapping 110 mph.And no, a C5 is not going to pull an SLK55 (you mentioned any N/A AMG 5.5L powerplant), nor is a C6 (an MN6 is pretty even, but traps a bit faster than the SLK55). A C5 ZO6 or a C6 ZO6 will pull an SLK55 (the C6Z will absolutely rape it - its a mid 11 sec car & traps 127 mph).
-Matt
If you have time to go to the track and see it for yourself..... http://www.lacr.net/index.html........ I could not believe it......but you have to see it with your own eye.........
An SLK55 runs a 12.7 sec quarter mile & traps 111 mph. The C4S runs just a hair slower (drivers race really) with a 12.9 sec quarter trapping 110 mph.And no, a C5 is not going to pull an SLK55 (you mentioned any N/A AMG 5.5L powerplant), nor is a C6 (an MN6 is pretty even, but traps a bit faster than the SLK55). A C5 ZO6 or a C6 ZO6 will pull an SLK55 (the C6Z will absolutely rape it - its a mid 11 sec car & traps 127 mph).
-Matt
you are right a C5 won't beat a SLK55, but a minor modded one will and im sorry but a MN6 C6 will pull a SLK55, especially up top. the power to weight ratio is just to great, better gearing helps but not enough

Video one:
Video two:
Video three:
Video four:
Video five:
Video six:
Video seven: even when the Z06 hopped on it first, the E55 closed the gap and then stayed with him.
Video eight:
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtest...slk55-amg.html
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtest...slk55-amg.html
hey how do these NA cars respond with bolt ons like intake, headers, exhaust, and cams????
Video one:
Video two:
Video three:
Video four:
Video five:
Video six:
Video seven: even when the Z06 hopped on it first, the E55 closed the gap and then stayed with him.
Video eight:
..?? I see what I see at LACR Palmdale....
.....with the 2,710 ft. above sea level AMG car don't run good......
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtest...slk55-amg.html
For instance: Car&Driver whips out this data on how the C6M was bested by a tenth @ 12.8 Wouldn't it be funny if 1 of those BONE STOCK C6 w/A4's came that day to, and ran there 12.5xx it is possible, You yourself reported this info & I've seen there Timeslips over @ CorvetteForum.com
It's all Subjective & you hate the idea of Mercedes bested by a Chevy so much you have to Impregnate every thread you see, w/your BS
Next week you'll see what a C6 A4 w/3.15's can do
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtest...slk55-amg.html



