Omeyhomey runs nicely moded C5 Z06 in his W210 e55
#76
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
therickter,
Is this your homey?
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/191844-looking-e55k-test-car.html
Is this your homey?
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/191844-looking-e55k-test-car.html
#77
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Correction it was only (1) post...
Originally Posted by JOE55
Originally Posted by TheDiesel
Originally Posted by JOE55
Diesel,
I apologize for deleteing one of your respond to Omey's thread without warning. I can put it back but pls. delete the pictures and stick with the topic.
With much respect,
-J
I apologize for deleteing one of your respond to Omey's thread without warning. I can put it back but pls. delete the pictures and stick with the topic.
With much respect,
-J
I can see he meens well, but hardly in touch w/reality. You have to admit his comical descriptions of his 10rwhp gains(post pulley install) were definitive proof of his ability to exaggerate/lie.
Take care & enjoy the ride,
JOE55
Last edited by Thericker; 05-04-2007 at 12:53 AM.
#78
Super Member
Omey's best performance mods are adding toluene to his tank and using several cans of "Seafoam" in his intake. Maybe we're missing Seafoams magical qualities.
His previous car was a W140 s320 rebadged S32 ///AMG. He called it "The world's fastest S320" but never dynoed his big claims for h.p..
He also had an alchohol and q-tip cleaned "AMG C36" mass air meter for sale here before being banned. He has no credibility in my eyes.
This should be his slogan "Seafoam cleaner is like a sore dick - you just can't beat it!!!"
His previous car was a W140 s320 rebadged S32 ///AMG. He called it "The world's fastest S320" but never dynoed his big claims for h.p..
He also had an alchohol and q-tip cleaned "AMG C36" mass air meter for sale here before being banned. He has no credibility in my eyes.
This should be his slogan "Seafoam cleaner is like a sore dick - you just can't beat it!!!"
#79
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Omey's best performance mods are adding toluene to his tank and using several cans of "Seafoam" in his intake. Maybe we're missing Seafoams magical qualities.
His previous car was a W140 s320 rebadged S32 ///AMG. He called it "The world's fastest S320" but never dynoed his big claims for h.p..
He also had an alchohol and q-tip cleaned "AMG C36" mass air meter for sale here before being banned. He has no credibility in my eyes.
This should be his slogan "Seafoam cleaner is like a sore dick - you just can't beat it!!!"
His previous car was a W140 s320 rebadged S32 ///AMG. He called it "The world's fastest S320" but never dynoed his big claims for h.p..
He also had an alchohol and q-tip cleaned "AMG C36" mass air meter for sale here before being banned. He has no credibility in my eyes.
This should be his slogan "Seafoam cleaner is like a sore dick - you just can't beat it!!!"
#80
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
My handle at Boringworld is TheDiesel..
1st here's Omeys pathetic dyno, post all mods, including his latest earth shattering Crank Pulley---garnered an entire 10 rwhp I laugh due to his previous but-dyno comical exclamtions of gained perf..
These are post racing results above, actually obvious lies, as his previous supposed races had these contradictive results(Omey said " from 80-130mph his 210 vs C5 Z06 were nearly DEAD EVEN" & the Z06 COULDN'T PULL ON HIM AT HIGHER SPEEDS, all this before magical pulley mod), but now he's loosing by multi-lengths 3+ but still conceding victory/vast improvement due to latest pulley mod lol..
Looks like someone needs to get his stories straight. I realize this is a bit overboard on my part but this guy wont let up? Even after I posted videos w/stock C5 Z06's running damn close to 211 AMG 55k's etc..
1st here's Omeys pathetic dyno, post all mods, including his latest earth shattering Crank Pulley---garnered an entire 10 rwhp I laugh due to his previous but-dyno comical exclamtions of gained perf..
These are post racing results above, actually obvious lies, as his previous supposed races had these contradictive results(Omey said " from 80-130mph his 210 vs C5 Z06 were nearly DEAD EVEN" & the Z06 COULDN'T PULL ON HIM AT HIGHER SPEEDS, all this before magical pulley mod), but now he's loosing by multi-lengths 3+ but still conceding victory/vast improvement due to latest pulley mod lol..
Looks like someone needs to get his stories straight. I realize this is a bit overboard on my part but this guy wont let up? Even after I posted videos w/stock C5 Z06's running damn close to 211 AMG 55k's etc..
My gal has been acting weird so I decided to enjoy the single life over the weekend. Every girl here you think may have a bf never does. Gotta love this city.
#81
MBWorld Fanatic!
#82
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
C5 Z06's faster than the gto's, modded C6's will eat you alive, they just have massive traction problems, still kool as hell though if you were beating them
#83
MBWorld Fanatic!
This was from a roll. Grant it I had a person(female) in my car and a 1 car start. He could not pull me back!! This was also while they were trying in vain to catch SleeperX. All of us(me and other three corvette's) took off behind Sleeper X and the white modded C6 ZO6 that were pulling away from myself and the other 3 Vettes.
#84
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
This was from a roll. Grant it I had a person(female) in my car and a 1 car start. He could not pull me back!! This was also while they were trying in vain to catch SleeperX. All of us(me and other three corvette's) took off behind Sleeper X and the white modded C6 ZO6 that were pulling away from myself and the other 3 Vettes.
#85
MBWorld Fanatic!
PS Let Sleeper X tell you how my car runs
#86
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
I think your getting Omey Homey syndrome? go to your nearest therapist
I run my bro Mario in his 210 E55 410+rwhp w/supercharger + Auquamist exhaust 2.82 gears etc.. 3680lbs I pull 8+ lengths on him now...from any roll, or dig..
----C6 has NO headers, No hi flo cats, NO X pipe...just CAI & cat-back TM removal---
C43 is 3450lbs + at least 50lbs for your 5.5 transplant, + lady friend say 120lbs(being nice, she could be a whaler ) =3620lbs w/310rwhp ahhh NO aint happenin Homey....
60lb difference and 100+ LESS rwhp Trust me driver stupidity on m6, + traction ='s your results nothing else take it for what it was a good day in your C43 nothing else.
Last edited by Thericker; 05-22-2007 at 10:00 PM.
#87
Something isn't right with this "410 rwhp" E55...
...because if it were putting out a *true* 410 rwhp, you shouldn't be putting eight lengths on him.
You ran an E55k, which dyno routinely about 430 rwhp, three times. You lost, three times. And E55ks weigh in at about 400 pounds more than the 3680 that you stated Mario's car weighs, while only putting down about 20 more rwhp than Mario's supposed 410.
E55k = 4100 pounds/430 rwhp = 9.53 lb/rwhp
Mario's supposed 410 rwhp E55 = 3700 pounds/410 rwhp = 9.02 pounds/rwhp, which would be better than the E55k.
So if Mario's car were truly putting out 410, he'd be pulling harder than an E55k due to his lower weight, and should have beaten you, not the other way around. Either that, or something went drastically wrong on that car after he got it dynoed.
You ran an E55k, which dyno routinely about 430 rwhp, three times. You lost, three times. And E55ks weigh in at about 400 pounds more than the 3680 that you stated Mario's car weighs, while only putting down about 20 more rwhp than Mario's supposed 410.
E55k = 4100 pounds/430 rwhp = 9.53 lb/rwhp
Mario's supposed 410 rwhp E55 = 3700 pounds/410 rwhp = 9.02 pounds/rwhp, which would be better than the E55k.
So if Mario's car were truly putting out 410, he'd be pulling harder than an E55k due to his lower weight, and should have beaten you, not the other way around. Either that, or something went drastically wrong on that car after he got it dynoed.
Last edited by Improviz; 05-23-2007 at 01:12 AM.
#88
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
...because if it were putting out a *true* 410 rwhp, you shouldn't be putting eight lengths on him.
You ran an E55k, which dyno routinely about 430 rwhp, three times. You lost, three times. And E55ks weigh in at about 400 pounds more than the 3680 that you stated Mario's car weighs, while only putting down about 20 more rwhp than Mario's supposed 410.
E55k = 4100 pounds/430 rwhp = 9.53 lb/rwhp
Mario's supposed 410 rwhp E55 = 3700 pounds/410 rwhp = 9.02 pounds/rwhp, which would be better than the E55k.
So if Mario's car were truly putting out 410, he'd be pulling harder than an E55k due to his lower weight, and should have beaten you, not the other way around. Either that, or something went drastically wrong on that car after he got it dynoed.
You ran an E55k, which dyno routinely about 430 rwhp, three times. You lost, three times. And E55ks weigh in at about 400 pounds more than the 3680 that you stated Mario's car weighs, while only putting down about 20 more rwhp than Mario's supposed 410.
E55k = 4100 pounds/430 rwhp = 9.53 lb/rwhp
Mario's supposed 410 rwhp E55 = 3700 pounds/410 rwhp = 9.02 pounds/rwhp, which would be better than the E55k.
So if Mario's car were truly putting out 410, he'd be pulling harder than an E55k due to his lower weight, and should have beaten you, not the other way around. Either that, or something went drastically wrong on that car after he got it dynoed.
leaving a 40-70rwto advantage to the w211
Also in (2) of my races w/Vadim I was damn close 1 within 2 lengths all the way up to 140+ the other by only 3/4 of a length from 40-140
And not to beat a dead horse but when I ran Mario I had plenty of traction we ran in the day time, and tires had more tread, I lost a ****load of traction on nearly every run w/Vadim he noted this as well.
If you doubt marios dyno? I can ask him to re-post it here? he's already done so quite a few times..
Edit: After I had a tuner remove TM I noticed the car was way quicker especially between shifts, TM reduces total available hp-torque between shifts or stomping on throttle, this was the only change before I had this done I was only pulling 3+ cars on him, It's retarded at 3/4 throttle shifting from 2nd to 3rd manually on the frwy 70mph at night on cold roads, the car turns into a fish outta water sliding around! scared the ****e outta me the 1st few times.
BTW...I got the w210 curb weight from Autotrader.com
Last edited by Thericker; 05-23-2007 at 01:59 AM.
#89
Yeah, but rwtq is only part of the picture: there's weight. And if Mario's car weighs in at 3700, he should easily be the equal of a 211 even if his torque is 410/460 (89%) or 420/490 (86%) of an E55k's, because his weight is 3700/4100 = 90% of the 211's.
So even if he does have a full 10% reduction in rwtq, it should be offset by the 10% reduction in weight.
I wasn't aware of any stock E55's hitting 490 rwtq. Here's Fikse's dyno plot:
http://www.dragtimes.com/2005-Merced...aphs-7808.html
He has one of the fastes stockers...ran a 12.07 @ 116.3, bone stock.
Torque hits 450-ish, 460 peak, drops off...typical FI torque curve. Horsepower peaks at 419 at about 5700 rpm.
As with all torque curves, hp and torque are equal at 5252 rpm thanks to the equation defining torque: hp = torque*rpm/5252 .
So Fikse's car would, at 5700 rpm, be producing 419*5252/5700 = 386 ft-lbs.
Mario's, which I would think peaked at the same rpm (given that it's got the same rated horsepower peak rpm as the 211 if memory serves) would be getting 410*5252/5700 = 378 ft-lbs. It would also be producing about 500 crank, using an 18% driveline loss (about the same as an E55k, same tranny, etc.).
So, if his car does weight 3700 pounds, it still has a better hp/weight ratio than a stock 211.
I'm not disputing that his dyno exists, or what it says, or your runs with him, but I would call into question the accuracy of that dyno given the results: with his weight and that rwhp (and that rwtq), the results should have been comparable to the E55k--in any case, you shouldn't be putting eight lengths on him, because his hp/weight ratio would be pretty close to yours: you dynoed 360, assume 18% driveline loss gives 439 crank, => you've got 3200/439 = 7.3 lb/hp versus his 410 => 500 crank => 7.4 lbs/hp.
So again: his dyno numbers just don't match these results. He should be significantly faster with that much horsepower, unless the weight of his car is a lot higher than 3700, around 700 pounds or so higher. Either that, or something has happened since then to his car to slow it down dramatically.
Btw, if your car is really producing 360 rwhp with an 18% driveline loss, this comes out to about 440 crank. At 3200 pounds, assuming you weigh about 200, you should be able to trap at a best of 118 mph on a good track with good conditions. I'd be interested to see results from both your car and his from a strip, along with weigh-in...you can get pretty accurate crank hp numbers if you've got that info.
Example: Fikse's car trapped at 116.3. Assuming it weighs the same as rated, 4100 pounds, and he weighs in at 170, he's putting out about 4270*(116.3/234)^3 = 524 crank. With an 18% driveline loss, that'd put his rwhp at 430, while with a 20% driveline loss it'd be 419.2. Pretty close!
So if we turn this around and use it on Mario's car (we'll assume a 20% loss, same as Fikse's, and no, I'm not gonna go back and redo the previous ones; too lazy!!), if the car weighs 3700, he weighs 170, this gives 512.5 crank hp. So it should trap at 234*(512.5/3870)^0.33333 = 119.27.
This equation is pretty accurate, too: take the Z06 for example. Weighs 3100 pounds. With 150 pound driver and 500 horsepower, it should trap at 234*(500/3250)^0.3333 = 125.38. Some of them have trapped higher, but 125 is pretty close to the average. And the one in Motor Trend that trapped higher was dynoed at figures indicating a crank hp more on the order of 530 than 500, so that accounts for some of it as well.
Anyway, I just can't see tha thing producing a true 410 crank and getting spanked by that with that weight....something's not right here. it should be making a better showing than that, no doubt about it.
So even if he does have a full 10% reduction in rwtq, it should be offset by the 10% reduction in weight.
I wasn't aware of any stock E55's hitting 490 rwtq. Here's Fikse's dyno plot:
http://www.dragtimes.com/2005-Merced...aphs-7808.html
He has one of the fastes stockers...ran a 12.07 @ 116.3, bone stock.
Torque hits 450-ish, 460 peak, drops off...typical FI torque curve. Horsepower peaks at 419 at about 5700 rpm.
As with all torque curves, hp and torque are equal at 5252 rpm thanks to the equation defining torque: hp = torque*rpm/5252 .
So Fikse's car would, at 5700 rpm, be producing 419*5252/5700 = 386 ft-lbs.
Mario's, which I would think peaked at the same rpm (given that it's got the same rated horsepower peak rpm as the 211 if memory serves) would be getting 410*5252/5700 = 378 ft-lbs. It would also be producing about 500 crank, using an 18% driveline loss (about the same as an E55k, same tranny, etc.).
So, if his car does weight 3700 pounds, it still has a better hp/weight ratio than a stock 211.
I'm not disputing that his dyno exists, or what it says, or your runs with him, but I would call into question the accuracy of that dyno given the results: with his weight and that rwhp (and that rwtq), the results should have been comparable to the E55k--in any case, you shouldn't be putting eight lengths on him, because his hp/weight ratio would be pretty close to yours: you dynoed 360, assume 18% driveline loss gives 439 crank, => you've got 3200/439 = 7.3 lb/hp versus his 410 => 500 crank => 7.4 lbs/hp.
So again: his dyno numbers just don't match these results. He should be significantly faster with that much horsepower, unless the weight of his car is a lot higher than 3700, around 700 pounds or so higher. Either that, or something has happened since then to his car to slow it down dramatically.
Btw, if your car is really producing 360 rwhp with an 18% driveline loss, this comes out to about 440 crank. At 3200 pounds, assuming you weigh about 200, you should be able to trap at a best of 118 mph on a good track with good conditions. I'd be interested to see results from both your car and his from a strip, along with weigh-in...you can get pretty accurate crank hp numbers if you've got that info.
Example: Fikse's car trapped at 116.3. Assuming it weighs the same as rated, 4100 pounds, and he weighs in at 170, he's putting out about 4270*(116.3/234)^3 = 524 crank. With an 18% driveline loss, that'd put his rwhp at 430, while with a 20% driveline loss it'd be 419.2. Pretty close!
So if we turn this around and use it on Mario's car (we'll assume a 20% loss, same as Fikse's, and no, I'm not gonna go back and redo the previous ones; too lazy!!), if the car weighs 3700, he weighs 170, this gives 512.5 crank hp. So it should trap at 234*(512.5/3870)^0.33333 = 119.27.
This equation is pretty accurate, too: take the Z06 for example. Weighs 3100 pounds. With 150 pound driver and 500 horsepower, it should trap at 234*(500/3250)^0.3333 = 125.38. Some of them have trapped higher, but 125 is pretty close to the average. And the one in Motor Trend that trapped higher was dynoed at figures indicating a crank hp more on the order of 530 than 500, so that accounts for some of it as well.
Anyway, I just can't see tha thing producing a true 410 crank and getting spanked by that with that weight....something's not right here. it should be making a better showing than that, no doubt about it.
#90
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Yeah, but rwtq is only part of the picture: there's weight. And if Mario's car weighs in at 3700, he should easily be the equal of a 211 even if his torque is 410/460 (89%) or 420/490 (86%) of an E55k's, because his weight is 3700/4100 = 90% of the 211's.
So even if he does have a full 10% reduction in rwtq, it should be offset by the 10% reduction in weight.
I wasn't aware of any stock E55's hitting 490 rwtq. Here's Fikse's dyno plot:
http://www.dragtimes.com/2005-Merced...aphs-7808.html
He has one of the fastes stockers...ran a 12.07 @ 116.3, bone stock.
Torque hits 450-ish, 460 peak, drops off...typical FI torque curve. Horsepower peaks at 419 at about 5700 rpm.
As with all torque curves, hp and torque are equal at 5252 rpm thanks to the equation defining torque: hp = torque*rpm/5252 .
So Fikse's car would, at 5700 rpm, be producing 419*5252/5700 = 386 ft-lbs.
Mario's, which I would think peaked at the same rpm (given that it's got the same rated horsepower peak rpm as the 211 if memory serves) would be getting 410*5252/5700 = 378 ft-lbs. It would also be producing about 500 crank, using an 18% driveline loss (about the same as an E55k, same tranny, etc.).
So, if his car does weight 3700 pounds, it still has a better hp/weight ratio than a stock 211.
I'm not disputing that his dyno exists, or what it says, or your runs with him, but I would call into question the accuracy of that dyno given the results: with his weight and that rwhp (and that rwtq), the results should have been comparable to the E55k--in any case, you shouldn't be putting eight lengths on him, because his hp/weight ratio would be pretty close to yours: you dynoed 360, assume 18% driveline loss gives 439 crank, => you've got 3200/439 = 7.3 lb/hp versus his 410 => 500 crank => 7.4 lbs/hp.
So again: his dyno numbers just don't match these results. He should be significantly faster with that much horsepower, unless the weight of his car is a lot higher than 3700, around 700 pounds or so higher. Either that, or something has happened since then to his car to slow it down dramatically.
Btw, if your car is really producing 360 rwhp with an 18% driveline loss, this comes out to about 440 crank. At 3200 pounds, assuming you weigh about 200, you should be able to trap at a best of 118 mph on a good track with good conditions. I'd be interested to see results from both your car and his from a strip, along with weigh-in...you can get pretty accurate crank hp numbers if you've got that info.
Example: Fikse's car trapped at 116.3. Assuming it weighs the same as rated, 4100 pounds, and he weighs in at 170, he's putting out about 4270*(116.3/234)^3 = 524 crank. With an 18% driveline loss, that'd put his rwhp at 430, while with a 20% driveline loss it'd be 419.2. Pretty close!
So if we turn this around and use it on Mario's car (we'll assume a 20% loss, same as Fikse's, and no, I'm not gonna go back and redo the previous ones; too lazy!!), if the car weighs 3700, he weighs 170, this gives 512.5 crank hp. So it should trap at 234*(512.5/3870)^0.33333 = 119.27.
This equation is pretty accurate, too: take the Z06 for example. Weighs 3100 pounds. With 150 pound driver and 500 horsepower, it should trap at 234*(500/3250)^0.3333 = 125.38. Some of them have trapped higher, but 125 is pretty close to the average. And the one in Motor Trend that trapped higher was dynoed at figures indicating a crank hp more on the order of 530 than 500, so that accounts for some of it as well.
Anyway, I just can't see tha thing producing a true 410 crank and getting spanked by that with that weight....something's not right here. it should be making a better showing than that, no doubt about it.
So even if he does have a full 10% reduction in rwtq, it should be offset by the 10% reduction in weight.
I wasn't aware of any stock E55's hitting 490 rwtq. Here's Fikse's dyno plot:
http://www.dragtimes.com/2005-Merced...aphs-7808.html
He has one of the fastes stockers...ran a 12.07 @ 116.3, bone stock.
Torque hits 450-ish, 460 peak, drops off...typical FI torque curve. Horsepower peaks at 419 at about 5700 rpm.
As with all torque curves, hp and torque are equal at 5252 rpm thanks to the equation defining torque: hp = torque*rpm/5252 .
So Fikse's car would, at 5700 rpm, be producing 419*5252/5700 = 386 ft-lbs.
Mario's, which I would think peaked at the same rpm (given that it's got the same rated horsepower peak rpm as the 211 if memory serves) would be getting 410*5252/5700 = 378 ft-lbs. It would also be producing about 500 crank, using an 18% driveline loss (about the same as an E55k, same tranny, etc.).
So, if his car does weight 3700 pounds, it still has a better hp/weight ratio than a stock 211.
I'm not disputing that his dyno exists, or what it says, or your runs with him, but I would call into question the accuracy of that dyno given the results: with his weight and that rwhp (and that rwtq), the results should have been comparable to the E55k--in any case, you shouldn't be putting eight lengths on him, because his hp/weight ratio would be pretty close to yours: you dynoed 360, assume 18% driveline loss gives 439 crank, => you've got 3200/439 = 7.3 lb/hp versus his 410 => 500 crank => 7.4 lbs/hp.
So again: his dyno numbers just don't match these results. He should be significantly faster with that much horsepower, unless the weight of his car is a lot higher than 3700, around 700 pounds or so higher. Either that, or something has happened since then to his car to slow it down dramatically.
Btw, if your car is really producing 360 rwhp with an 18% driveline loss, this comes out to about 440 crank. At 3200 pounds, assuming you weigh about 200, you should be able to trap at a best of 118 mph on a good track with good conditions. I'd be interested to see results from both your car and his from a strip, along with weigh-in...you can get pretty accurate crank hp numbers if you've got that info.
Example: Fikse's car trapped at 116.3. Assuming it weighs the same as rated, 4100 pounds, and he weighs in at 170, he's putting out about 4270*(116.3/234)^3 = 524 crank. With an 18% driveline loss, that'd put his rwhp at 430, while with a 20% driveline loss it'd be 419.2. Pretty close!
So if we turn this around and use it on Mario's car (we'll assume a 20% loss, same as Fikse's, and no, I'm not gonna go back and redo the previous ones; too lazy!!), if the car weighs 3700, he weighs 170, this gives 512.5 crank hp. So it should trap at 234*(512.5/3870)^0.33333 = 119.27.
This equation is pretty accurate, too: take the Z06 for example. Weighs 3100 pounds. With 150 pound driver and 500 horsepower, it should trap at 234*(500/3250)^0.3333 = 125.38. Some of them have trapped higher, but 125 is pretty close to the average. And the one in Motor Trend that trapped higher was dynoed at figures indicating a crank hp more on the order of 530 than 500, so that accounts for some of it as well.
Anyway, I just can't see tha thing producing a true 410 crank and getting spanked by that with that weight....something's not right here. it should be making a better showing than that, no doubt about it.
All I know is his last dyno was from up north "Godspeeds shop" and he got the results I previously stated. Maybe the difference in colder weather up north gave him some extra ponies
I always use his 210 55 as my litmus test because we've raced since I was stock, many times after, + he's the only guy 25min from me, always up for a little race
I plan on getting a FULL tune, then I'll hit a track, even LACR, since Juicee and others have set the bar at that ****y track, I wont be humilated to run 12.99-13.xx as long as my traps are at least 114+
Edit: I love the 211 E55k and did lots of research on it, I can dig up the dozen or so dynos I previously posted in the E55 forum, the average is 460-490 rwto stock, some even higher! I know it shocked me as well, also Torque is paramount on frwy rolls, like in my races w/Vadim
I'll dig up the old posts/dynos later.
No matter are past differences I do appreciate a good conversation w/you
Last edited by Thericker; 05-23-2007 at 05:27 PM.
#91
MBWorld Fanatic!
Oh ok.. your car is running low 12's now then? cause modded C6 have NO prob achieving low 12's high 11's....trust me you wouldn't don't know how hard it is to find traction especially modded? comparing most likely M6 trans equiped C6 vehicles, they vary so widely hardly ever driven to there limit or peak perf.
I think your getting Omey Homey syndrome? go to your nearest therapist
I run my bro Mario in his 210 E55 410+rwhp w/supercharger + Auquamist exhaust 2.82 gears etc.. 3680lbs I pull 8+ lengths on him now...from any roll, or dig..
----C6 has NO headers, No hi flo cats, NO X pipe...just CAI & cat-back TM removal---
C43 is 3450lbs + at least 50lbs for your 5.5 transplant, + lady friend say 120lbs(being nice, she could be a whaler ) =3620lbs w/310rwhp ahhh NO aint happenin Homey....
60lb difference and 100+ LESS rwhp Trust me driver stupidity on m6, + traction ='s your results nothing else take it for what it was a good day in your C43 nothing else.
I think your getting Omey Homey syndrome? go to your nearest therapist
I run my bro Mario in his 210 E55 410+rwhp w/supercharger + Auquamist exhaust 2.82 gears etc.. 3680lbs I pull 8+ lengths on him now...from any roll, or dig..
----C6 has NO headers, No hi flo cats, NO X pipe...just CAI & cat-back TM removal---
C43 is 3450lbs + at least 50lbs for your 5.5 transplant, + lady friend say 120lbs(being nice, she could be a whaler ) =3620lbs w/310rwhp ahhh NO aint happenin Homey....
60lb difference and 100+ LESS rwhp Trust me driver stupidity on m6, + traction ='s your results nothing else take it for what it was a good day in your C43 nothing else.
Stck(no cams,exh,or headers) my car put out 310whp with the 5.5L motor. Have you forgotten I have Kleeman cams,Upgraded SW,Kleeman headers,3" stainless steel exhaust back? I still have yet to dyno since the Car has adpated to all the mods. Have you forgotten? Stop hatin Biotch! We were all there. kill the sour grapes! Here's JLee's car with the same mods with a horrid launch of 2.5 and look at his mph. And mind you this is in a w209 CLK55 like PTE's car which is also alot heavier than mines:
Last night at the Newengland Drag Way..
13.326 @ 110.21mph.
R/T =.779
60' =2.518
330 =6.097
1/8 =9.007 @ 84.70mph
1000 =11.494
1/4 13.326 @110.21mph
Last one was 13.512@ 106.5mph.
Used M and traction on.
There was a short wheel slip in the beginning.
weighed 4000lbs with me and a half tank of fuel.
With HRE 19s(8.5 9.5) 235 265 P-Zero Nero.
Sus: PSS9
Pulley: Evosport N/A V8 kit(other than pullies and LSD)
13.326 @ 110.21mph.
R/T =.779
60' =2.518
330 =6.097
1/8 =9.007 @ 84.70mph
1000 =11.494
1/4 13.326 @110.21mph
Last one was 13.512@ 106.5mph.
Used M and traction on.
There was a short wheel slip in the beginning.
weighed 4000lbs with me and a half tank of fuel.
With HRE 19s(8.5 9.5) 235 265 P-Zero Nero.
Sus: PSS9
Pulley: Evosport N/A V8 kit(other than pullies and LSD)
Last edited by ProjectC55; 05-23-2007 at 06:55 PM.
#92
MBWorld Fanatic!
#94
MBWorld Fanatic!
#95
MBWorld Fanatic!
C6 vs CLK55
Last edited by ProjectC55; 05-23-2007 at 09:12 PM.
#96
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Not saying it will run low 12's till I run it. But have no reason to believe itwon't run 12's. PTE's N/A CLK55 with the same mods ran 12.6 @110 and a best of 12.4 @111 with the Quaiffe diff. The diff is the only mod difference between both our cars plus my car is lighter.
Stck(no cams,exh,or headers) my car put out 310whp with the 5.5L motor. Have you forgotten I have Kleeman cams,Upgraded SW,Kleeman headers,3" stainless steel exhaust back? I still have yet to dyno since the Car has adpated to all the mods. Have you forgotten? Stop hatin Biotch! We were all there. kill the sour grapes! Here's JLee's car with the same mods with a horrid launch of 2.5 and look at his mph. And mind you this is in a w209 CLK55 like PTE's car which is also alot heavier than mines:
Stck(no cams,exh,or headers) my car put out 310whp with the 5.5L motor. Have you forgotten I have Kleeman cams,Upgraded SW,Kleeman headers,3" stainless steel exhaust back? I still have yet to dyno since the Car has adpated to all the mods. Have you forgotten? Stop hatin Biotch! We were all there. kill the sour grapes! Here's JLee's car with the same mods with a horrid launch of 2.5 and look at his mph. And mind you this is in a w209 CLK55 like PTE's car which is also alot heavier than mines:
#97
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Question? Why do you keep generalizing, and saying the same stuff you said about "Benzmacs" car? Jlee has Evosport pulleys, & LSD, also stronger 2003 55?
Can't wait to see your slip! good luck
Last edited by Thericker; 05-24-2007 at 12:01 AM.
#98
You make lots of good points, (1) forgot to mention is Mario is into bodybuilding like me(I'm 6'1" 200-205lbs) but bigger about 6'2" 230-235lbs and yes his car could be heavier than my quote from Autotrader.com (I use them cause they always have info on any car, though it does fluctuate, so maybe the w210 55 is heavier)
If I had some 1/4 runs and a weigh-in for his car, it'd be easy enough to figure out, but for now it shall remain a mystery.
I always use his 210 55 as my litmus test because we've raced since I was stock, many times after, + he's the only guy 25min from me, always up for a little race
I plan on getting a FULL tune, then I'll hit a track, even LACR, since Juicee and others have set the bar at that ****y track, I wont be humilated to run 12.99-13.xx as long as my traps are at least 114+
I plan on getting a FULL tune, then I'll hit a track, even LACR, since Juicee and others have set the bar at that ****y track, I wont be humilated to run 12.99-13.xx as long as my traps are at least 114+
Edit: I love the 211 E55k and did lots of research on it, I can dig up the dozen or so dynos I previously posted in the E55 forum, the average is 460-490 rwto stock, some even higher! I know it shocked me as well, also Torque is paramount on frwy rolls, like in my races w/Vadim
I'll dig up the old posts/dynos later.
No matter are past differences I do appreciate a good conversation w/you
I'll dig up the old posts/dynos later.
No matter are past differences I do appreciate a good conversation w/you
#99
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Sounds like you're of similar build to me, but you're taller and leaner, I'm shorter and wider, lol...I'm about 5'11", 198-ish unless I start skipping workouts, lol...anyway, the extra weight on Mario wouldn't change things much, but if the car picked up any weight w/the SC installation, other stuff, it would...although someone on the forums was telling me recently that a Renntech (I think) SC actually removed weight because the assembly was lighter than the stock manifold!! But there are a lot of variables here, so who knows?
If I had some 1/4 runs and a weigh-in for his car, it'd be easy enough to figure out, but for now it shall remain a mystery.
I can't find it...only one I can find for him is this one, which is 367 peak hp/377 peak torque, which would explain your pulling him like that. But that was from last April....sounds like you're talking something more recent?
Well, if your crank hp is where your dyno number says it is, you should have no trouble trapping higher than that.
If I had some 1/4 runs and a weigh-in for his car, it'd be easy enough to figure out, but for now it shall remain a mystery.
I can't find it...only one I can find for him is this one, which is 367 peak hp/377 peak torque, which would explain your pulling him like that. But that was from last April....sounds like you're talking something more recent?
Well, if your crank hp is where your dyno number says it is, you should have no trouble trapping higher than that.
Yeah that was his old dyno, he recently had the Maggie rebuilt, and added full Aquamist chemical/water/meth cooling spray, since his SC is NON intercooled it added 40 or so rwhp + a few more ponies from rebuild. he has the MP90, shouldn't weigh much at all.
My enemy is not eating enough! I have to put down 6+ meals a day just to maintain, bodyfat is retarded LOW, I have a super fast metabolism.
Edit: My stock dyno been posted here a few times was 348rwhp 360 rwto, since then added cat-back Bullets(design is NO mufflers just small reso's loud as ****e!) CAI, and TM removal, but got bigger wider wheels on 345/30 rubbers on 19x12 Z06 equipment, now dyno at 360 rwhp and 355-358 rwto can't remeber torque exactly...so I gained and lost some, but feels infinitely stronger post TM removal! that governor type limiter sux!
Last edited by Thericker; 05-24-2007 at 03:15 AM.
#100
MBWorld Fanatic!
W211 E55 documented hp is 463 or 469 hp correct? SL55 has 493 documented hp correct? When you dyno them both they put out the same RWHP correct!!!!! Such is the case with my car and the CLK55's from 2000 to 2003. Plus my car is lighter than a W209 CLK55. Read what Improviz says about power to weight ratio again Charlie!
However,not worried about limited slip Charlie. With the right tires in a straight line I'm sure I'll get a good launch as seen by SleeperX and Enzom whom both don't have LSD! Again I said it should run 12's but I won't proclaim anything until or unless I do it. I just know on a roll I was saying where is the C6?
I posted you some runs with the CLK55 vs your beloved C6 and this is all you have to say? Screw the pullies. Even our friend Mario will tell you that he did not notice a diference when he had them on his car N/A. He was trying to sell them prior to placing on the HPS kit.
Here's a car without pullies and LSD:
https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c55-amg-w203/191821-one-fast-c55.html
I think you like to debate and argue for the sake of it! Seems like your em-mo!
LOL! THANKS and wish me luck at the track!!!
Last edited by ProjectC55; 05-24-2007 at 03:26 AM.