E320 vs ........
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The city that never sleeps
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ML320, Looking for my S4
E320 vs ........
So, I really dont feel like posting up all the stories so heres the just of it.
E320 Vs E430...................................E320 FTW
E320 Vs CLK430................................E320 FTW
E320 Vs ML55...................................E320 FTW close race
E320 Vs SLK350 manual......................E320 FTW
E320 with 500 extra lbs Vs E320...........Tommygunn E320
E320 Vs stock 1.8T Gti.......................E320
E320 Vs 330CI..................................E320
E320 Vs Militant-grunt ::ko3::............ .1.8T up to 80MPH after E320
E320 Vs militant-grunt ::ko4::..............1.8T up to 120. Start pulling at 80 mph
Its just to much of a hassle. Dyno Hp 220rwhp. For now.....
E320 Vs E430...................................E320 FTW
E320 Vs CLK430................................E320 FTW
E320 Vs ML55...................................E320 FTW close race
E320 Vs SLK350 manual......................E320 FTW
E320 with 500 extra lbs Vs E320...........Tommygunn E320
E320 Vs stock 1.8T Gti.......................E320
E320 Vs 330CI..................................E320
E320 Vs Militant-grunt ::ko3::............ .1.8T up to 80MPH after E320
E320 Vs militant-grunt ::ko4::..............1.8T up to 120. Start pulling at 80 mph
Its just to much of a hassle. Dyno Hp 220rwhp. For now.....
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
E320 Vs BMW 3.2L 325i........................... BMW 325i 3.2L FTW decisively
Last edited by ProjectC55; 08-03-2007 at 06:47 AM.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The city that never sleeps
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ML320, Looking for my S4
No no e320 is on a winning streak. FTW means for the win. And Carl you pulled that one outa NOWHERE. I'm thinking meh 325 e36 SLOW. Then i'm doing 130+ and you pull on me like nothing i'm like WTF!!???
Also i love how NOW it says m3.
Also i love how NOW it says m3.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
130 mph LOL! We were'nt doing anywhere near close to 130mph when I pulled on you. Which run was that?
It was well b4 70mph which is somewhere while I'm in second going to third gear from a roll.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The city that never sleeps
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ML320, Looking for my S4
No! I have a 1999 Blue M3 and a 1994 black M332i(325i 3.2l) which was the one you raced.
130 mph LOL! We were'nt doing anywhere near close to 130mph when I pulled on you. Which run was that?
It was well b4 70mph which is somewhere while I'm in second going to third gear from a roll.
130 mph LOL! We were'nt doing anywhere near close to 130mph when I pulled on you. Which run was that?
It was well b4 70mph which is somewhere while I'm in second going to third gear from a roll.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
I never dynoed my C43 when it had the 4.3L motor in it. But there were two C43's and a CLK430 with me when I first dynoed with the 5.5l motor. One C43 dynoed 238whp,the other dynoed 233whp,while the CLK430 dynoed 223 to 227whp. All cars were dynoed on a dynojet but the guy had a crappy small fan IMOP.
#9
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
540 6spd
Gotcha!
I never dynoed my C43 when it had the 4.3L motor in it. But there were two C43's and a CLK430 with me when I first dynoed with the 5.5l motor. One C43 dynoed 238whp,the other dynoed 233whp,while the CLK430 dynoed 223 to 227whp. All cars were dynoed on a dynojet but the guy had a crappy small fan IMOP.
I never dynoed my C43 when it had the 4.3L motor in it. But there were two C43's and a CLK430 with me when I first dynoed with the 5.5l motor. One C43 dynoed 238whp,the other dynoed 233whp,while the CLK430 dynoed 223 to 227whp. All cars were dynoed on a dynojet but the guy had a crappy small fan IMOP.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The city that never sleeps
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ML320, Looking for my S4
i hammered that thing last night and jesus christ it was AMAZING. But and theirs always a but. I got a call this morning and my dads in the hospital because his cancer is spreading....... so i have to hold off now. Sighs. The c43 is better in every aspect over the E320. It pulls harder, it doesnt stop pulling and it just flies. I still remember your c43. That thing was a monster.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The city that never sleeps
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ML320, Looking for my S4
jon, jon, jon........ you seem to keep forgetting that the C43 you raced has E55 wheels. Their not as light as you 17's. Their about a good 20 Lbs hevier PERWHEEL.
#17
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
540 6spd
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
95 Audi urS6 Quattro
Thats on a K04 with a manufacturer defect and no software buddy
Your time will come Tom, just watch, second I start working again, injectors + FMIC + PC-16 k04 file =
Your time will come Tom, just watch, second I start working again, injectors + FMIC + PC-16 k04 file =
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
95 Audi urS6 Quattro
So, I really dont feel like posting up all the stories so heres the just of it.
E320 Vs E430...................................E320 FTW
E320 Vs CLK430................................E320 FTW
E320 Vs ML55...................................E320 FTW close race
E320 Vs SLK350 manual......................E320 FTW
E320 with 500 extra lbs Vs E320...........Tommygunn E320
E320 Vs stock 1.8T Gti.......................E320
E320 Vs 330CI..................................E320
E320 Vs Militant-grunt ::ko3::............ .1.8T up to 80MPH after E320
E320 Vs militant-grunt ::ko4::..............1.8T up to 120. Start pulling at 80 mph
Its just to much of a hassle. Dyno Hp 220rwhp. For now.....
E320 Vs E430...................................E320 FTW
E320 Vs CLK430................................E320 FTW
E320 Vs ML55...................................E320 FTW close race
E320 Vs SLK350 manual......................E320 FTW
E320 with 500 extra lbs Vs E320...........Tommygunn E320
E320 Vs stock 1.8T Gti.......................E320
E320 Vs 330CI..................................E320
E320 Vs Militant-grunt ::ko3::............ .1.8T up to 80MPH after E320
E320 Vs militant-grunt ::ko4::..............1.8T up to 120. Start pulling at 80 mph
Its just to much of a hassle. Dyno Hp 220rwhp. For now.....
" E320 Vs 330CI..................................E320 "
Whos 330ci are we talking about here, because as I remember correctly you got your *** handed to 4 times in a row in martins bone stock 330ci (with a bad clutch no less!) when I drove it =P.
Remember a good driver is everything
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BMW FTW
I dont get how you say 320 vs CLK430 then post 320 vs ML55 close race.. The CLK 430 is rated 1/2 a second quicker than an ML55 AMG in 0-60 rating. And over 1/2 second quicker in the 1/2 mile.
Might want to re race with a competent driver behind some of the cars you have listed.. I am not saying you didnt beat them but you beat them because of either a problem with their car or a problem with the driver.
Might want to re race with a competent driver behind some of the cars you have listed.. I am not saying you didnt beat them but you beat them because of either a problem with their car or a problem with the driver.
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
So with the autotragic tranny in our C43's the 233 to 240whp is very feasible for 302 @ the crank. I'm not very familiar with the drivetrain losses in both cars, but we lose alot with our trannies.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
I dont get how you say 320 vs CLK430 then post 320 vs ML55 close race.. The CLK 430 is rated 1/2 a second quicker than an ML55 AMG in 0-60 rating. And over 1/2 second quicker in the 1/2 mile.
Might want to re race with a competent driver behind some of the cars you have listed.. I am not saying you didnt beat them but you beat them because of either a problem with their car or a problem with the driver.
Might want to re race with a competent driver behind some of the cars you have listed.. I am not saying you didnt beat them but you beat them because of either a problem with their car or a problem with the driver.