Video: 2007 Sti vs. my 2003 S600
04-27-2008, 07:32 PM
#51
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
none
05-02-2008, 12:27 AM
#54
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Exodus' phony roll-ons and more:
The following consists of excerpts of posts I did yesterday and today showing what a liar and a tool Exodus is, and is presented as a public service for the OP, and anyone else who finds him to be 1/10 as annoying as I do:
And then, the fool grabbed a shovel and proceeded to dig himself in about 100' deeper:
Hmm, I see....so, you raced your brother's GTO in your E55, were disappointed with the results, and so decided to "hate on AMGs". No problem there....oh, wait, there is one small problem:
The thing is, the post where you "hated on the AMGs" was dated 8/3/2006...and this presents a tiny problem, because....
....drumroll, please....
....it's coming....
YOU (supposedly) BOUGHT YOUR E55 IN JUNE 2007!!!!
Posted 6/30/2007:
OK, I see now...so, you bought your E55 in June '07, then promptly travelled back in time to August 2006, where you raced your brother (funny, in August 2006 you wrote that he was your "friend", and now he's morphed into your "brother"....I guess time travel can make your memory a bit fuzzy
), and, disappointed with the results, you "hated on AMGs".
You then travelled back to the future (is this an E55, or a DeLorean?) to 2007, where you ran an 11.9 @ 119 in the car, which was presumably made faster by time travel, as back in 2006 it couldn't beat a 13.7/106 GTO....oh, no wait, what's that you say:
Oh, gee, sorry about that...I guess I just misunderstood you when you plainly stated that you ran that time IN YOUR CAR:
What a tangled web you've woven there, sport....keep it up, this is fun!
Another interesting matter...last year you claimed that you'd run an 11.90 @ 119 in a "bone stock" E55. Yet when asked to produce a slip, you replied:
This is a lie. Your first post On MBWorld this forum was on 7/19/06, and at that time and for some time thereafter, you made it quite clear that you did NOT own an E55 Posted 9/22/06:
Five days later, you indicated that you were interested in purchasing an E Class:
And then there's this little nugget, from 9/29/06, which makes absolutely no sense if you had, as you wrote, run an 11.9 @ 119 in your E55 before you joined the forum:
So when was it that you actually did purchase the E55? In June 2007--a full year after you had joined the forum:
Care to explain? You said that at the time you supposedly ran this amazing 11.9 @ 119 run in your stock E55, you weren't active in these forums. And yet now we see that this is absolutely, totally a lie.
The truth is that not only were you active in the forum at the time you said you purchased that car, you were *very* active--yet never even bothered to post the slip, or mention/discuss the run, which at that time would have been one of the fastest stock runs ever, to/with any forum members.
This despite your having cited dragtimes.com slips for E55s and lots of other cars, posting videos (I guess when *you* post videos, they're ironclad), etc...and oh, of course: after taking several hours to go to a track and perform this amazing run, why would you take two minutes to go and post *your* amazing 11.9 @ 119 run there at dragtimes (or here)?
Or, for that matter, why would anyone take the trouble to go to a strip (which, I might add, you refuse to do now, again labeling it an "immature d!ck measuring contest), perform an amazing run, which if true would have been (and still would be) one of the fastest stock runs ever, and not even bother to save the slip from this remarkable run??
You just got PWNED, dude. Hillary is under sniper fire!!
Five days later, you indicated that you were interested in purchasing an E Class:
I'm in the market for a new car, and my mind is
set on the E-Class. The 63 in particular due to the, no offense, some what dated looks of the 55. But, I will go for whichever is faster... the 55 is still amazing and is only dated in comparison. I just like the whole... Darth Vader look the 63 portrays black on black ESPECIALLY Mche55's E63. God that thing looks vicious. lol so, I'm a bit biased towards the 63...
set on the E-Class. The 63 in particular due to the, no offense, some what dated looks of the 55. But, I will go for whichever is faster... the 55 is still amazing and is only dated in comparison. I just like the whole... Darth Vader look the 63 portrays black on black ESPECIALLY Mche55's E63. God that thing looks vicious. lol so, I'm a bit biased towards the 63...
Enzom, Fikse:
AMAZING RUNS!
I'm a firm believer that if the conditions were perfect, the E55 could break 11s... 11.8-11.9.
Fikse, my apologies for using your car without your permission, I wasn't aware it belonged to you; I hope you don't mind if I use(d) it to trounce this magazine racing troll...
AMAZING RUNS!
I'm a firm believer that if the conditions were perfect, the E55 could break 11s... 11.8-11.9.
Fikse, my apologies for using your car without your permission, I wasn't aware it belonged to you; I hope you don't mind if I use(d) it to trounce this magazine racing troll...
The truth is that not only were you active in the forum at the time you said you purchased that car, you were *very* active--yet never even bothered to post the slip, or mention/discuss the run, which at that time would have been one of the fastest stock runs ever, to/with any forum members.
This despite your having cited dragtimes.com slips for E55s and lots of other cars, posting videos (I guess when *you* post videos, they're ironclad), etc...and oh, of course: after taking several hours to go to a track and perform this amazing run, why would you take two minutes to go and post *your* amazing 11.9 @ 119 run there at dragtimes (or here)?
Or, for that matter, why would anyone take the trouble to go to a strip (which, I might add, you refuse to do now, again labeling it an "immature d!ck measuring contest), perform an amazing run, which if true would have been (and still would be) one of the fastest stock runs ever, and not even bother to save the slip from this remarkable run??
You just got PWNED, dude.
Hillary is under sniper fire!!Yup, I was naive-- what can I say?
And I still hold to it, a 6.0 GTO can and WILL roast a SLK55, and a GTO can and WILL run a E55 door to door-- I should know, I had the E55. When I ran my brother, we went from 50-137 ish where my car shut off, the 55 was lagging due to heat soak, which at the time I had no idea off *hence* the results.
That's why I was "hating" on AMGs, I was in truth shocked my own E55 couldn't pull away from the GTO. I did get it fixed and the tables did turn, obvious from the fact I don't own a GTO or Vette.
And I still hold to it, a 6.0 GTO can and WILL roast a SLK55, and a GTO can and WILL run a E55 door to door-- I should know, I had the E55. When I ran my brother, we went from 50-137 ish where my car shut off, the 55 was lagging due to heat soak, which at the time I had no idea off *hence* the results.
That's why I was "hating" on AMGs, I was in truth shocked my own E55 couldn't pull away from the GTO. I did get it fixed and the tables did turn, obvious from the fact I don't own a GTO or Vette.
The thing is, the post where you "hated on the AMGs" was dated 8/3/2006...and this presents a tiny problem, because....
....drumroll, please....
....it's coming....
YOU (supposedly) BOUGHT YOUR E55 IN JUNE 2007!!!!
Posted 6/30/2007:
OK, I see now...so, you bought your E55 in June '07, then promptly travelled back in time to August 2006, where you raced your brother (funny, in August 2006 you wrote that he was your "friend", and now he's morphed into your "brother"....I guess time travel can make your memory a bit fuzzy
), and, disappointed with the results, you "hated on AMGs". You then travelled back to the future (is this an E55, or a DeLorean?
) to 2007, where you ran an 11.9 @ 119 in the car, which was presumably made faster by time travel, as back in 2006 it couldn't beat a 13.7/106 GTO....oh, no wait, what's that you say:EDIT: Yup, that wasn't my E55, close friends. Because I used to wiegh in around 130, I drove it at the track for his 200 lb ***. I did acquire the E55 when I said I did. He insisted the weight difference would break 11s, and wouldn't you kow it? I know, I know-- Captain Cook with no proof right? Anyways I just never mentioned the one I ran wasn't mine. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
What a tangled web you've woven there, sport....keep it up, this is fun!
05-02-2008, 05:29 AM
#56
MBWorld Fanatic!
