Kill Stories Discuss your exciting high speed excursions here!

Clk55 vs e90 M3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #1  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Clk55 vs e90 M3

Nice day in Mexico for a friendly run. Before the run I was thinking I'm going to get beat pretty good. But I had faith in my Clk55. Started when I was behind the new V8 M3 he gunned it so I did the same. I was right on his ***. Somehow I came around by 130 which when he backed off. So I waited for him and he rolled down the window and said your car is fast! I wasn't impressed with the new V8 M3. I guess my skinny *** helps!
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 12:46 PM
  #2  
M-bENZ's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 5
Corrolla
yea my skinny *** helps me sometimes too lolz.

Andy
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 03:09 PM
  #3  
hotrod182's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
335i
Considering they are only 4 liter V8s, they don't do too bad. They don't have much torque however. On the other hand, I took my 3.0L 335i to the dragstrip yesterday. Juice Box controller, stock exhaust, cats, intercooler, airbox, etc. Ran at 11.783 and my highest trap was 120.916 mph in 66F temps. (would have been faster in cooler temps)
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 07:37 PM
  #4  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Yeah the new M3s peak hp is at redline over 8k rpm.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 07:51 PM
  #5  
jturkel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by hotrod182
Considering they are only 4 liter V8s, they don't do too bad. They don't have much torque however. On the other hand, I took my 3.0L 335i to the dragstrip yesterday. Juice Box controller, stock exhaust, cats, intercooler, airbox, etc. Ran at 11.783 and my highest trap was 120.916 mph in 66F temps. (would have been faster in cooler temps)
no DPs? .....i know that those cars are quick. JB3, FMIC, intake, is fast.....but without DPs, i find it difficult to believe 120.9 trap speed is obtainable. were you on 100 octane? or at -1500 DA?

Last edited by jturkel; Apr 12, 2009 at 08:38 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 08:36 PM
  #6  
transferred's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
From: OC, SoCal
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
Nice day in Mexico for a friendly run. Before the run I was thinking I'm going to get beat pretty good. But I had faith in my Clk55. Started when I was behind the new V8 M3 he gunned it so I did the same. I was right on his ***. Somehow I came around by 130 which when he backed off. So I waited for him and he rolled down the window and said your car is fast! I wasn't impressed with the new V8 M3. I guess my skinny *** helps!


Unless the guy couldn't drive I don't buy this....isn't your CLK basically stock?

335i trapping 120.9, for reals?

-Rob
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009 | 10:08 PM
  #7  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by transferred


Unless the guy couldn't drive I don't buy this....isn't your CLK basically stock?

335i trapping 120.9, for reals?

-Rob


You got to know that I was drafting behind him. Yes its stock.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 03:55 AM
  #8  
hotrod182's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
335i
Originally Posted by transferred


Unless the guy couldn't drive I don't buy this....isn't your CLK basically stock?

335i trapping 120.9, for reals?

-Rob
Yes, it was on a 65F day too. And that is with no limited slip diff!

http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-335i-Timeslip-18139.html

Totally stock downpipes, exhaust, intercooler, etc. It is so quiet, smooth, gets 27mpg on the highway, and on the weekends, I race the Lotus group through the canyons. You can see my videos on Youtube.

Last edited by hotrod182; Apr 13, 2009 at 03:57 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 06:19 AM
  #9  
jonmartin's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Ya he was playing with you. Probably had a good laugh too.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 10:31 AM
  #10  
Cylinder Head's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,760
Likes: 594
From: Seattle
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
You got to know that I was drafting behind him. Yes its stock.
WTF is this Days of Thunder????

Again Cole Trickle, you're completely full of BS. The M3 that wasn't really there had 40 ponies, and a weight and gearbox advantage on your pig of a CLK.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #11  
Militant-Grunt's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 1
From: New York City
95 Audi urS6 Quattro
We should make a dedicated thread just for Jon. "Jon's imaginary race winning thread".

Even a novice E90 M3 driver would still be able to beat your pig Jon.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 07:48 PM
  #12  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
You guys are too much Come out and bring your stock V8 M3s and see me do it again
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 07:51 PM
  #13  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
WTF is this Days of Thunder????

Again Cole Trickle, you're completely full of BS. The M3 that wasn't really there had 40 ponies, and a weight and gearbox advantage on your pig of a CLK.
Pig my Clk55 is the w202 which is about 3400lbs. Stick with your Bimmers son
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 08:01 PM
  #14  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Too bad the new V8 M3s are a disappointment Also look at dragtimes the e90 M3 with a 2.1 60ft it ran 8.5sec in 1/8mile the same as mine in the 1/8. They just dont have the trq because of the small 4.0 v8. So any e90 M3s want a piece?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #15  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
BTW the M3 gunned it at 60mph which is at his dead spot. He was pulling slightly but I was close enough to get his draft and sling shot around him Bam boom you shouldve seen the look on his face. I wanted to go again but he refused whimp! Its all in good fun
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 10:42 PM
  #16  
jonmartin's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
Too bad the new V8 M3s are a disappointment Also look at dragtimes the e90 M3 with a 2.1 60ft it ran 8.5sec in 1/8mile the same as mine in the 1/8. They just dont have the trq because of the small 4.0 v8. So any e90 M3s want a piece?
Ya buddy sure.... Find the worst time you can on an M3 vs your Best ever time and you still lose no matter what.. Your car is slower this thread is dumb, end of story. If you think you pulled on him and he was actually trying he probably raced you in 6th gear the whole time and didn't even care to downshift.

Also btw you have a W208 not a W202 if your going to act like you know something about cars, know what car you drive at least. How ever if your in LA I know a few stock M3's that will love to show you the obvious. If not run along now and remember say no to drugs lil johnny.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 12:24 AM
  #17  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by jonmartin
Ya buddy sure.... Find the worst time you can on an M3 vs your Best ever time and you still lose no matter what.. Your car is slower this thread is dumb, end of story. If you think you pulled on him and he was actually trying he probably raced you in 6th gear the whole time and didn't even care to downshift.

Also btw you have a W208 not a W202 if your going to act like you know something about cars, know what car you drive at least. How ever if your in LA I know a few stock M3's that will love to show you the obvious. If not run along now and remember say no to drugs lil johnny.
I know the e90m3 are faster But they are dissapointing 6th gear your a moron. They only trap like 5mph faster in the 1/4. I will bet any $ that I will beat a e90m3 in a lower gear then me. I ran my friends e63 I didnt have a chance to draft.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 03:45 AM
  #18  
jonmartin's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
I know the e90m3 are faster But they are dissapointing 6th gear your a moron. They only trap like 5mph faster in the 1/4. I will bet any $ that I will beat a e90m3 in a lower gear then me. I ran my friends e63 I didnt have a chance to draft.
Even if it were 5mph that's a few car lengths..... Your not beating an M3 with its engine running end of story give it up.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 08:37 AM
  #19  
Cylinder Head's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,760
Likes: 594
From: Seattle
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
BTW the M3 gunned it at 60mph which is at his dead spot. He was pulling slightly but I was close enough to get his draft and sling shot around him Bam boom you shouldve seen the look on his face. I wanted to go again but he refused whimp! Its all in good fun
Your car isn't set up to take advantage of drafting you moron. It's not like a W208 is an aerodynamic masterpiece, it's a frigging brick. You have no downforce, no underbody aero work to speak of, and you're talking about drafting???

MB W208 CLK55 (2001-02)
Weight =3573 LB
0-60 =4.9 sec
1/4 mile =13.2 sec
Source: Mercedes-Benz USA (conservative figures)

Specs on E90 M3

Weight 1605 kilo / 3538.4 lbs
Performance figures
Power 420 bhp / 313 KW @ 8300 rpm
Torque 400 Nm / 295 ft lbs @ 3900 rpm
BHP/Liter 105 bhp / liter
Power to weight 0.26 bhp / kg
Top Speed 250 km/h / 155 mph
0-60 mph 4.8 s

So the M3 weighs less, has more power, better gearbox, WAY better aerodynamics, and you're telling me you beat one?? Either he wasn't racing, was driving his grandmother to bingo night, or you're completely full of BS.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 09:29 AM
  #20  
TMC M5's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 53
From: Maryland
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
I know the e90m3 are faster But they are dissapointing 6th gear your a moron. They only trap like 5mph faster in the 1/4. I will bet any $ that I will beat a e90m3 in a lower gear then me. I ran my friends e63 I didnt have a chance to draft.
You kind of owned yourself right there....especially since you supposedly passed him at 130mph. The only "drafting" that went on was when you wrote your post. The race cars that draft each other are very similarly powered. The difference in high speed ability between your car and an E90 M3 is much bigger. Yes, I have seen a new 4 door M3 not able to crack 13.0. The launch and 1/4 mile ET isn't the M3's forte. As speed builds, the M3 is able to stretch its legs. If you had written that you smoked an M3 in the 1/4 mile, I would have found that believable. But you wrote that you smoked it above 130mph by drafting it.... if only Spielberg had your imagination...

Tom
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 02:19 PM
  #21  
HLG600's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,052
Likes: 340
From: NJ
2009 SL63 AMG
Originally Posted by hotrod182
Juice Box controller, stock exhaust, cats, intercooler, airbox, etc. Ran at 11.783 and my highest trap was 120.916 mph in 66F temps. (would have been faster in cooler temps)
I doubt you're picking up 15+ mph in the trap from just a tune on pump. My friend has one, running the JB3 and dual cones. It is a very quick car, but not something that traps nearly 121 mph. You sure you didn't fill up with 110 octane?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 04:15 PM
  #22  
MB Dave's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 863
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Suzuki Burgman Executive
lol!! he has moved to club lexus to be a troll.

http://www.clublexus.com/forums/stor...-e90-m3-2.html
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 06:06 PM
  #23  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by TMC M5
You kind of owned yourself right there....especially since you supposedly passed him at 130mph. The only "drafting" that went on was when you wrote your post. The race cars that draft each other are very similarly powered. The difference in high speed ability between your car and an E90 M3 is much bigger. Yes, I have seen a new 4 door M3 not able to crack 13.0. The launch and 1/4 mile ET isn't the M3's forte. As speed builds, the M3 is able to stretch its legs. If you had written that you smoked an M3 in the 1/4 mile, I would have found that believable. But you wrote that you smoked it above 130mph by drafting it.... if only Spielberg had your imagination...

Tom
I never said I smoked it but came around because I didnt want to rearend him. Thats when he backed off he just couldnt lose me
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 06:12 PM
  #24  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Your car isn't set up to take advantage of drafting you moron. It's not like a W208 is an aerodynamic masterpiece, it's a frigging brick. You have no downforce, no underbody aero work to speak of, and you're talking about drafting???

MB W208 CLK55 (2001-02)
Weight =3573 LB
0-60 =4.9 sec
1/4 mile =13.2 sec
Source: Mercedes-Benz USA (conservative figures)

Specs on E90 M3

Weight 1605 kilo / 3538.4 lbs
Performance figures
Power 420 bhp / 313 KW @ 8300 rpm
Torque 400 Nm / 295 ft lbs @ 3900 rpm
BHP/Liter 105 bhp / liter
Power to weight 0.26 bhp / kg
Top Speed 250 km/h / 155 mph
0-60 mph 4.8 s

So the M3 weighs less, has more power, better gearbox, WAY better aerodynamics, and you're telling me you beat one?? Either he wasn't racing, was driving his grandmother to bingo night, or you're completely full of BS.
Blah blah with the stats my Clk55 lbs like 35xx with my skinny *** in it. There was a scale at the drag strip. If he wasnt racing why did he take it to 130?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 06:19 PM
  #25  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by audi_guy
lol!! he has moved to club lexus to be a troll.

http://www.clublexus.com/forums/stor...-e90-m3-2.html
The reason I'm on the Lexus forum is I had an interest in the ISF which has similar performance as the new m3. Now the ISF is out. Personally hate bmws. Sorry bimmer owners
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.