Odd but... CLK430 vs C43... surprising results..
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Odd but... CLK430 vs C43... surprising results..
I was pulling away from the C43 from 80mph up after downshifting. We were going 120+ on the 605 on sporratic traffic.
One time, I let him go in front of me and let him jerk first. But I was just pulling closer and closer to his rear end.
I was REAL surprised by the results.
One time, I let him go in front of me and let him jerk first. But I was just pulling closer and closer to his rear end.
I was REAL surprised by the results.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Club202.com
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1998 C43
Interesting......I've never run against a CLK 430, but they are quite similar in performance. I would think that the 43 would pull away if you kept going, but not really too smart (safety-wise). What is the curb weight of your car?
Last edited by Denlasoul; 04-04-2003 at 09:50 PM.
#3
Super Member
Thread Starter
If I remember correctly, it's about 3322. Isn't the C43 something like 3380?
I expected the C43 to pull away also but no, I could see his car getting smaller slowly from my rear view.
I expected the C43 to pull away also but no, I could see his car getting smaller slowly from my rear view.
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Club202.com
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1998 C43
theine:
those are some pretty high numbers compared to what I've seen and read. I've read that 43's run slightly under 6.0. and 1/4's closer 14.4. I know that one shouldnt believe what people say or print, but I think the numbers you posted are kinda high - even if you got those from MB's site.
Only way to tell is at the track.![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Still wouldnt mind running against a 430, I know they are similar in numbers.
those are some pretty high numbers compared to what I've seen and read. I've read that 43's run slightly under 6.0. and 1/4's closer 14.4. I know that one shouldnt believe what people say or print, but I think the numbers you posted are kinda high - even if you got those from MB's site.
Only way to tell is at the track.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Still wouldnt mind running against a 430, I know they are similar in numbers.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally posted by Denlasoul
theine:
those are some pretty high numbers compared to what I've seen and read. I've read that 43's run slightly under 6.0. and 1/4's closer 14.4. I know that one shouldnt believe what people say or print, but I think the numbers you posted are kinda high - even if you got those from MB's site.
Only way to tell is at the track.![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Still wouldnt mind running against a 430, I know they are similar in numbers.
theine:
those are some pretty high numbers compared to what I've seen and read. I've read that 43's run slightly under 6.0. and 1/4's closer 14.4. I know that one shouldnt believe what people say or print, but I think the numbers you posted are kinda high - even if you got those from MB's site.
Only way to tell is at the track.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Still wouldnt mind running against a 430, I know they are similar in numbers.
#11
Super Member
Thread Starter
Originally posted by Denlasoul
Where you located? I wouldnt mind running with a CLK 430, I know they are pretty fast stock.
Where you located? I wouldnt mind running with a CLK 430, I know they are pretty fast stock.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Club202.com
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1998 C43
Arnee:
Regardless of suspension issues, I still think that the CLK 430 is pretty fast. I was looking up some numbers and they are pretty much even. I still think that both cars run to 60 in about 6.0, and that their 1/4's are in the 14's. I'll try and find a local 430 to run with me at the strip, now I'm really curious to how my 43 will hold up!![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
theine:
How do you like the underdrive pulleys? I'm considering picking up a set too and would like your opinion.
Regards,
DLS
Regardless of suspension issues, I still think that the CLK 430 is pretty fast. I was looking up some numbers and they are pretty much even. I still think that both cars run to 60 in about 6.0, and that their 1/4's are in the 14's. I'll try and find a local 430 to run with me at the strip, now I'm really curious to how my 43 will hold up!
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
theine:
How do you like the underdrive pulleys? I'm considering picking up a set too and would like your opinion.
Regards,
DLS
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally posted by Denlasoul
theine:
How do you like the underdrive pulleys? I'm considering picking up a set too and would like your opinion.
Regards,
DLS
theine:
How do you like the underdrive pulleys? I'm considering picking up a set too and would like your opinion.
Regards,
DLS
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#14
Super Member
Thread Starter
Originally posted by theine
My car improved 4/10's of a second 0-60 to 5.7, I am waiting for evosport headers, which should give me another 15 HP and lower my 0-60 to the mid 5's.
My car improved 4/10's of a second 0-60 to 5.7, I am waiting for evosport headers, which should give me another 15 HP and lower my 0-60 to the mid 5's.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
5.7 and mid 5's, that's CLK55 territory (as far as acceleration is concerned) without the $15k price tag. Good stuff.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally posted by Arnee
5.7 and mid 5's, that's CLK55 territory (as far as acceleration is concerned) without the $15k price tag. Good stuff.
5.7 and mid 5's, that's CLK55 territory (as far as acceleration is concerned) without the $15k price tag. Good stuff.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#16
Super Member
Thread Starter
Originally posted by Denlasoul
Arnee:
Regardless of suspension issues, I still think that the CLK 430 is pretty fast. I was looking up some numbers and they are pretty much even. I still think that both cars run to 60 in about 6.0, and that their 1/4's are in the 14's. I'll try and find a local 430 to run with me at the strip, now I'm really curious to how my 43 will hold up!![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Regards,
DLS
Arnee:
Regardless of suspension issues, I still think that the CLK 430 is pretty fast. I was looking up some numbers and they are pretty much even. I still think that both cars run to 60 in about 6.0, and that their 1/4's are in the 14's. I'll try and find a local 430 to run with me at the strip, now I'm really curious to how my 43 will hold up!
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Regards,
DLS