M-Class (W163) Produced 1998-2005: ML 230, ML 320, ML 350, ML 400 CDI, ML 430, ML 500, ML 270 CDI

Michelin Cross Terrain vs. Bridgestone Dueler HL Alenza??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-29-2005, 07:20 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
mkoechel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 GL540
Question Michelin Cross Terrain vs. Bridgestone Dueler HL Alenza??

Time to get new tires for our 2003 ML500 -- I've had Michelin Cross Terrain on our previous 2000 ML so I'm leaning in that direction.

The Bridgestone Dueler HL Alenza is also in the running per info from Luke at Tirerack.

Anyone running them? Cheaper than Michelin by quite a margin and the ratings look almost identical...

Thanks,
Old 09-29-2005, 05:21 PM
  #2  
Newbie
 
GeorgeF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On my new-to-me ML500 I have a Dunlop tire that I'm not entirely happy with yet, SP Sport 5000. The tread looks really "cool" but they seem to really follow grooves/cuts in the pavement at all speeds.

I will also be driving in quite a bit of winter weather, and I am concerned about how they will perform, as the car came from Alabama, and I would guess that snow/ice was not at the forefront of the PO's decision making process
Old 10-01-2005, 04:08 PM
  #3  
Member
 
straightSIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: long island
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'03 E39 530I
Cross terrain.
Old 10-01-2005, 04:36 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55AMG99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WOT somewhere in the Bay Area
Posts: 3,445
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
1951 Caterpiller D6
Bridgestone are absolute garbage tires. The set on my Denali howled at any speed and sounded 100x worse when braking or turning. My wife heard it from the outside and was so embarasses at how bad it sounded that she wouldn't drive it. They rode like I was on water baloons and caused my gas mileage to drop .2 MPG. I switched to the Michelins and all the problems are gone. Nice, quiet ride and fuel economy is back where it should be.
Old 10-02-2005, 05:13 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
jswedberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
C32 AMG
I put the Michelins on our ML at about 40,000 miles - at 70,000 they are still going strong. Quieter than original Bridgestones. They are more expensive though.
Old 10-04-2005, 06:13 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
When I purchased my ML430 used it had 32K miles and brand new Cross Terrains. These babies are great in the snow! I love them. Of course I have nothing to compare them to because this is my first SUV. My ML now has 63K miles on it and I think I have maybe one more winter left in these tires. The tread is getting kinda low, but not bald yet. They still ride great!
Old 10-05-2005, 01:42 PM
  #7  
Almost a Member!
 
zeke320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cross terrain

I have used multiple sets of cross terrains on two different ML, driving for a total of over 150k miles. They are great tires in both wet (including snow) and dry conditions. More quiet than OEM tires for sure. Always replaced them at 50k because thats what they were rated for but they seemed to have sufficient tread for many more miles.
Old 10-06-2005, 05:53 PM
  #8  
Newbie
 
psychocabbage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yokohama makes a 275/55/17 tire that we just mounted up. They are far better than the stockers on our ML350..

As for tires going in the grooves.. that is common for better tires to lock on.. Porsche with cheesy tires showed no signs of following the grooves, add PZeros and BAM.. It followed every groove easily..
Old 10-28-2005, 01:05 AM
  #9  
Almost a Member!
 
drummerboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Michelins Cross........Absolutely!

For those with tracking problems, have your front end checked as well.
I found a bad tierod end.
Old 11-05-2005, 02:39 PM
  #10  
Newbie
 
paulxu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 ML320
Bridgestone is garbage?!

I'm really surprised!!

I just put on a set of Bridgestone Dueler/Alenza on my 2000 ML, and I'm more than satisfied with the tires, of course compared to the previous Dunlop Grandtrek.

The bridgestone tires perform much quieter than the Dunlops and I could hardly hear any obvious sound caused by them, not to mention hearing loud noise from outside?

I couldn't comapre them with Michelin X Terrains because I have never used them before, but I'd say those Bridgestone tires are definitely not garbage tires. As you can read the reviews posted on Tirerack.com, I don't believe people are paying hundreds to enjoy noise the tires make and give them good ratings. In addition, the Dueler is about $20 to $30 below X-Terrain's for each, and there was a $75 rebate with the purchase of 4 tires. I really don't see what is so bad about the tires. Hopefully not because they cost less.

Last edited by paulxu; 11-05-2005 at 02:42 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Michelin Cross Terrain vs. Bridgestone Dueler HL Alenza??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM.