M-Class (W164) Produced 2006-2011: ML280CDI, ML320CDI, ML420CDI, ML350, ML500, ML550

Rear Brake rotor/pad dilemma

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-29-2022 | 04:09 AM
  #1  
azzurribaggio's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 209
Likes: 7
2011 ML350
Rear Brake rotor/pad dilemma

Last summer took my W164 to get the rear brake rotors/pads replaced.
Took the SUV into the shop last week for some AC work and I had them inspect my brakes to see if the fronts needed replacing.
Mechanic comes back and says rear brake rotor/pads needs replacing, he says wait till the sensor goes off to replace them.

So I didn't tell him they were replaced last summer, can someone already spot the dilemma?
So either the shop last year didn't replace them and just charged me OR the latest mechanic is BS'ing me. The mechanic from last year closed up shop a few months back (he had been at that location for 11 years) so I cannot ask him what the deal was.
I want to measure them myself but can I do this with the tires still on? If they are new rotors they shouldn't have any lip since it hasn't even been a year yet correct?
Old 03-29-2022 | 04:22 AM
  #2  
Maj. Dundee's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,107
Likes: 754
From: Bronx, N.Y.
2002 ML 320 & 2006 ML500
You can check the wear as per the PDF or jack up the driver side wheel, remove the tire and check the thickness.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Check Brake Pad Thickness.pdf (254.9 KB, 49 views)
Old 03-29-2022 | 04:32 AM
  #3  
azzurribaggio's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 209
Likes: 7
2011 ML350
Ok so I decided to take a look myself.
The rear rotor doesn't have any lip at all compared to the fronts which definitely have a lip.
Below is a pic of the rear brake pad which looks pretty thick to me, correct?

so I'll give the most recent mechanic the benefit of the doubt and assume he meant to say the fronts (even though I asked him several times if the rears really needed replacing)

below is the driver's side front brake pad
Old 03-29-2022 | 05:26 AM
  #4  
Maj. Dundee's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,107
Likes: 754
From: Bronx, N.Y.
2002 ML 320 & 2006 ML500
I don't know what you mean by "lip". . but it looks like you have enough padding.

Just rely on the Inst. Cluster alert for brake wear.
Old 03-29-2022 | 10:44 AM
  #5  
azzurribaggio's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 209
Likes: 7
2011 ML350
Originally Posted by Maj. Dundee
I don't know what you mean by "lip". . but it looks like you have enough padding.

Just rely on the Inst. Cluster alert for brake wear.
The brake rotor, the fronts have a lip from wear, whereas the rear ones don't since they must be new.
Old 03-29-2022 | 12:41 PM
  #6  
chassis's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
MBWorld Ambassador
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 13,560
Likes: 4,044
From: unbegrenzt
2017 GLE350 4MATIC
Do it the right way and measure the pad thickness using a tool from an auto parts store. There is no dilemma here.

Ignore what mechanics tell you, produce the information yourself. You tell them what to do, not the other way round.

If you have taken the photos correctly, the pads have enough material on them.
Old 03-29-2022 | 12:45 PM
  #7  
E55Greasemonkey's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,478
Likes: 1,490
From: Orbiting the planet
This place is a joke.
The pads you are showing look fine, but you need to look at the inner pads as those tend to wear out first.
The following users liked this post:
chassis (03-29-2022)
Old 03-29-2022 | 01:51 PM
  #8  
lkchris's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,081
Likes: 211
From: Albuquerque
'07 GL320CDI, '10 CL550
As a rotor wears away, the very outside of the surface remains, as the pads don’t touch that area. This remaining area is often called a lip.

This lip is pretty useful, as it can show 1 mm of wear and the assumption should be there is 1 mm wear on the back side … and maximum permitted wear is 2 mm … so, time for new rotors.

Condition of pads doesn’t matter at this point because old pads on new rotors is not permitted. Time for new pads too.

Of course you have to remove the caliper holder to get the rotor off … and Mercedes specifies the screws that mount the holder be replaced, not reused. Order new screws, too.
Old 03-29-2022 | 04:39 PM
  #9  
azzurribaggio's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 209
Likes: 7
2011 ML350
Originally Posted by chassis
Do it the right way and measure the pad thickness using a tool from an auto parts store. There is no dilemma here.

Ignore what mechanics tell you, produce the information yourself. You tell them what to do, not the other way round.

If you have taken the photos correctly, the pads have enough material on them.
Yeah I just order a tool from Amazon. I have a micrometer but I'd have to remove the wheel to properly use it. Just glad to know that other shop last summer didn't screw me by not replacing the rear rotor/pads.
I'll wait for the front sensor to go off then I'll have both rotors/pad replaced
The following users liked this post:
chassis (03-29-2022)
Old 04-02-2022 | 01:36 AM
  #10  
wannawagon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 384
Likes: 21
From: Queensalnd Australia
2006 ML320 CDI (2 of) and 2008 GL320
Absolutely agree that you need to look at both inner and outer pads. If the caliper slides aren’t lubed (on pad change) it won’t slide properly and one pad will rub and wear quicker. Had a case recently when inner was nearly shot but outer was great (still had bevels)

I have put new discs on nearly new pads when a car had low pads (which I had in stock) but needed to wait a few months for discs to come in stock (covid delay in Australia). But obviously not ideal
Old 04-27-2022 | 08:29 AM
  #11  
ahmedroyce's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
e30 2000
Ignore what mechanics tell you, produce the information yourself. You tell them what to do, not the other way round.







Showbox jiofi.local.html tplinklogin

Last edited by ahmedroyce; 04-27-2022 at 09:02 AM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Rear Brake rotor/pad dilemma



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 PM.