R-Class (W251) Produced 2006-2013: R320CDI, R350, R420CDI, R500

Roof rack basic carrier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-24-2010, 04:01 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
jwratts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: indiana
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 R320, 2009 Routan ChryWagen (gone) 1998 E430 (gone) 2007 X5 (gone) 2001 X5 (gone) 1995 M3 LUX
Roof rack basic carrier

Anyone out there have a basic unit (mounts and cross bars) they want to sell?
I am looking for an OEM Mercedes unit.
Old 10-24-2010, 09:31 PM
  #2  
Member
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 R320 CDI, 2010 FJ Cruiser, CTS-V
You are better off going with the Thule if you ask me.
Old 10-26-2010, 09:32 AM
  #3  
Member
 
Ted Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 R350 BlueTec
Stick with the OEM, they are everything that a Mercedes is supposed to be.

There's probably a reason you can't find too many OEM, because they work so well that nobody gets rid of them.

I didn't find the price of a new roof rack & medium box to be too bad in price. And, when I got it home - everything fit perfectly !!

Thule is a good product, but they keep saying it's just as good as OEM. That doesn't cut it in my book. If Thule was just as good, the dealers would carry them too.
Old 10-26-2010, 10:50 AM
  #4  
Member
 
termite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mt. Sinai, NY
Posts: 141
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
2013 E350 wagon cuprite brown; sold:2014 ML63; R500 Saks Edition; R500; more W124s than I can count
I have posted on this question before, having had both OEM [made by thule btw; so much for "everything that a Mercedes is supposed to be" !] and the thule. i sold the OEM rack because i found that the thule is far more useful because you are not limited to the relatively narrow span of the OEM rack. my packasport pod would not even fit on the OEM rack w/o resting on the plastic end caps which are not load bearing. the other advantages to the thule setup, which mounts just as the OEM rack mounts, is that it sits slightly lower than the OEM rack producing inherently less wind noise, and you can use longer bars for wider loads such as a ski rack and pod. finally, you can use the thule wind fairing which cuts rack noise even further...
Old 10-27-2010, 12:44 PM
  #5  
Newbie
 
briland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the OEM racks and wish I bought the thule racks. The factory racks sit too high. The plastic end caps also vibrate in the wind. I use gaffers tape stop the noise.
Old 10-27-2010, 12:50 PM
  #6  
Member
 
Ted Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 R350 BlueTec
I guess in all fairness, I have not owned a Thule rack and can't say they're better or worse.

But my OEM only makes wind noise - just like anything would.
Old 01-09-2011, 08:00 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
cyeung65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 292
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Q & R
Originally Posted by Ted Flynn
I guess in all fairness, I have not owned a Thule rack and can't say they're better or worse.

But my OEM only makes wind noise - just like anything would.
Not so - just put these on my Audi Q7:

http://www.whispbar.com/cars/audi/q7...atedrails-5053

But they dont have fit kits for the R-class!
Old 01-09-2011, 09:05 AM
  #8  
Member
 
Ted Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 R350 BlueTec
How do you like your Q7 when comparing to a "R"?

If MB dumps the R, I'd be forced to go to the Q7 because it's the only other diesel out there.
Old 01-14-2011, 09:13 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
cyeung65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 292
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Q & R
Originally Posted by Ted Flynn
How do you like your Q7 when comparing to a "R"?

If MB dumps the R, I'd be forced to go to the Q7 because it's the only other diesel out there.
Had 2 Q7s. First one was 3.6 V-6, new one 3.0 - Supercharged. Q is quieter and both versions accelerate better, but especially so for the 2011 model. The R sits lower and has more legroom in rows 2 and 3 compared to Q. So, for the driver, the Q wins, for passenger space - the R wins. Also, the COMAND electronics in the MB are an embarrassment compared to the Audi MMi 3G.

Back on topic - does anyone know specifics about the MB cargo box? How big is it?
Old 01-17-2011, 01:35 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
zemun1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 313
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2005 E320 CDI (sold); 2007 R320 CDI (sold); 2008 ML320 CDI; 2014 ML350 Bluetec
Originally Posted by cyeung65
Had 2 Q7s. First one was 3.6 V-6, new one 3.0 - Supercharged. Q is quieter and both versions accelerate better, but especially so for the 2011 model. The R sits lower and has more legroom in rows 2 and 3 compared to Q. So, for the driver, the Q wins, for passenger space - the R wins. Also, the COMAND electronics in the MB are an embarrassment compared to the Audi MMi 3G.

Back on topic - does anyone know specifics about the MB cargo box? How big is it?
I think it's Yakima box with MB logo ...go to Yakima website and check those boxes. One thing for sure, MB is not in business of making cargo boxes

I got similar question this year and I bought Thule - aero bars + box. The size of box depends on your needs. As for bars, I'd advise buy aero bars and it could fit a few different cars.
Old 02-14-2011, 01:13 AM
  #11  
Newbie
 
n365034's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GL450, CL600
I have one that I took off of my wife 2008 R350. Email me if interetested n365034@gmail.com

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Roof rack basic carrier



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 AM.