Drop by lowering links or Star Mod?
Can you please let me know what is the best way to drop my car. I have a 2004 S430 with AMG sport suspension. I have read a lot about the lowering links at http://www.adjustableairride.com/ and using Star diagnostics at VRP performance tuning (http://vrptuning.com/cart/index.php?...=index&cPath=5). Seems like the links allow for more flexibility and I can change the ride hight as I need. Yet, seems like people are saying the Star diagnostic modification is safer, but doesn't allow for the car to be dropped too low.

Any help is appreciated. Thaks everyone!
Can you please let me know what is the best way to drop my car. I have a 2004 S430 with AMG sport suspension. I have read a lot about the lowering links at http://www.adjustableairride.com/ and using Star diagnostics at VRP performance tuning (http://vrptuning.com/cart/index.php?...=index&cPath=5). Seems like the links allow for more flexibility and I can change the ride hight as I need. Yet, seems like people are saying the Star diagnostic modification is safer, but doesn't allow for the car to be dropped too low.

Any help is appreciated. Thaks everyone!

I'm swaying away from the star method of lowering the car, only because there is no lowering height guarantee, and if i'm not totally slamming the car then the links shouldn't have a major negative impact, right?
Can you please let me know what is the best way to drop my car. I have a 2004 S430 with AMG sport suspension. I have read a lot about the lowering links at http://www.adjustableairride.com/ and using Star diagnostics at VRP performance tuning (http://vrptuning.com/cart/index.php?...=index&cPath=5). Seems like the links allow for more flexibility and I can change the ride hight as I need. Yet, seems like people are saying the Star diagnostic modification is safer, but doesn't allow for the car to be dropped too low.

Any help is appreciated. Thaks everyone!
John is a great person to do business with. You won't be disappointed with the links, i've had them for just over a year with 0 problems.


I'm swaying away from the star method of lowering the car, only because there is no lowering height guarantee, and if i'm not totally slamming the car then the links shouldn't have a major negative impact, right?

Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Other question. I have an extended Mercedes warranty. If something went wrong with the Star method, wouldnt the dealership blame the "reprogramming"? If I use link and something goes bad, then I could change it back to the stock links and tell them there is a problem with the car?
Other question. I have an extended Mercedes warranty. If something went wrong with the Star method, wouldnt the dealership blame the "reprogramming"? If I use link and something goes bad, then I could change it back to the stock links and tell them there is a problem with the car?
If it is the dealer doing to the Star lowering, they shouldn't blame you for it. If they didn't want to deal with the possibility of failing struts, they wouldn't lower for you in the first place.
I'm not biased. I was lowered on links for 2 years until my struts failed.
Guys, understand I am trying to help out. If you want to lower the car with links, no one is gonna stop you. I'm sharing knowledge which I have acquired from members who understand the Airmatic system better than I do.
Ignore my comments for all I care, just stop advertising falsified facts. The fact is, whether you deny it or not, that lowering the car with links isn't the same thing as lowering it via Star or RT ELM.
Also understand I'm not saying lowering the car with links will guarantee failure or anything. I'm sure some have and will have no issues with them.
Guys, understand I am trying to help out. If you want to lower the car with links, no one is gonna stop you. I'm sharing knowledge which I have acquired from members who understand the Airmatic system better than I do.
Ignore my comments for all I care, just stop advertising falsified facts. The fact is, whether you deny it or not, that lowering the car with links isn't the same thing as lowering it via Star or RT ELM.
Also understand I'm not saying lowering the car with links will guarantee failure or anything. I'm sure some have and will have no issues with them.

Thanks everyone!
Guys, understand I am trying to help out. If you want to lower the car with links, no one is gonna stop you. I'm sharing knowledge which I have acquired from members who understand the Airmatic system better than I do.
Ignore my comments for all I care, just stop advertising falsified facts. The fact is, whether you deny it or not, that lowering the car with links isn't the same thing as lowering it via Star or RT ELM.
Also understand I'm not saying lowering the car with links will guarantee failure or anything. I'm sure some have and will have no issues with them.
Guys, understand I am trying to help out. If you want to lower the car with links, no one is gonna stop you. I'm sharing knowledge which I have acquired from members who understand the Airmatic system better than I do.
Ignore my comments for all I care, just stop advertising falsified facts. The fact is, whether you deny it or not, that lowering the car with links isn't the same thing as lowering it via Star or RT ELM.
Also understand I'm not saying lowering the car with links will guarantee failure or anything. I'm sure some have and will have no issues with them.
While I respect your strong feelings about links, I can assure you that there are no real facts that support either method. The only thing to go by is users with experience, and you will be hard pressed to find some with real fact to support the claim that there car failed solely because they used links instead of some other method.
What I find interesting is the fact that ALL W220's come stock with a adjustable link in the rear and yo never hear any complaints about rear shocks.Hmmm.
Anyway..
Since MOST users of any lowering method own cars between the years of 'Normal" airmatic issues, even if there were some real statistics taken they would be skewed by that fact alone.
Also take into consideration the Logical side of the discussion and the physical side.
Physically there IS a window on ANY airshock that maximizes the shocks ablilty to withstand the weight it's supporting and at the same time maintain the integrity of the shock. I don;t think anyone here can give any exact data as to what that particular window is for these cars..
We do know that since the car is programed to lower itself 3/4 inches after 80mph, that the lower limit must be lower than 3/4 how much who knows?? But for quality and safety sake we must assume that the engineers who built this car didn't program it any where near a danger zone.
Then we look at the logical. This seems simple enough for me as a programmer because this is my area of expertise.. i think I explained this somewhere before but I can;t remember.
Anyhow, logically the basic program for the height of the car has to be based on these things.
1. Physical input from the two front height transducers ( analog )
2. Physical input from the rear height transducer(s) ( analog also )
3. a programmed set of references that are matched to the above inputs that send an output to the Airmatic system based on the difference between these signals.
I hope that makes sense.
So the difference is that with STAR or a MODULE, When the references (3) are changed the car will adjust until the physical inputs (1 and 2) are correct again to the 'new" references
With the links, the Physical input values(1 and 2) are changed by the same amount, and the car will adjust itself till the inputs are correct again to the "original" references.(3)
the rest of the program for squatting, etc.. never changes in whether method because they all correspond to the requests of main function which stays the same no matter what.
So whomever says its not the same, well, fundamentally they are incorrect.
Looking at it in reverse,
If I loaded my car with 500lbs of bricks and weighted it down, transducer settings would be off therefore my car will raise till it is level again. When I
remove the 500lbs of bricks, my values will be off again and the car will lower itself till its level again.
Whether i had links or star or whatever this routine will NOT change..
You can't fool a program, unless you alter some value or another and those alterations MUST lead you back to a certain referenced value..
These cars don't have any conscious idea they are lowered or not. Just like an Elevator has no idea which floor its on, or even cares whether its going up or down at any particular time. It simply relies on signals and inputs to match a pre set of parameters... Thats how everything in our world works..
Links=$ less than $200
Module= Fortune..
results= The same.
Let your conscious be your guide.
I write programs like this with my eyes closed that's how I eat.
Links are how I roll...
While I respect your strong feelings about links, I can assure you that there are no real facts that support either method. The only thing to go by is users with experience, and you will be hard pressed to find some with real fact to support the claim that there car failed solely because they used links instead of some other method.
What I find interesting is the fact that ALL W220's come stock with a adjustable link in the rear and yo never hear any complaints about rear shocks.Hmmm.
Anyway..
Since MOST users of any lowering method own cars between the years of 'Normal" airmatic issues, even if there were some real statistics taken they would be skewed by that fact alone.
Also take into consideration the Logical side of the discussion and the physical side.
Physically there IS a window on ANY airshock that maximizes the shocks ablilty to withstand the weight it's supporting and at the same time maintain the integrity of the shock. I don;t think anyone here can give any exact data as to what that particular window is for these cars..
We do know that since the car is programed to lower itself 3/4 inches after 80mph, that the lower limit must be lower than 3/4 how much who knows?? But for quality and safety sake we must assume that the engineers who built this car didn't program it any where near a danger zone.
Then we look at the logical. This seems simple enough for me as a programmer because this is my area of expertise.. i think I explained this somewhere before but I can;t remember.
Anyhow, logically the basic program for the height of the car has to be based on these things.
1. Physical input from the two front height transducers ( analog )
2. Physical input from the rear height transducer(s) ( analog also )
3. a programmed set of references that are matched to the above inputs that send an output to the Airmatic system based on the difference between these signals.
I hope that makes sense.
So the difference is that with STAR or a MODULE, When the references (3) are changed the car will adjust until the physical inputs (1 and 2) are correct again to the 'new" references
With the links, the Physical input values(1 and 2) are changed by the same amount, and the car will adjust itself till the inputs are correct again to the "original" references.(3)
the rest of the program for squatting, etc.. never changes in whether method because they all correspond to the requests of main function which stays the same no matter what.
So whomever says its not the same, well, fundamentally they are incorrect.
Looking at it in reverse,
If I loaded my car with 500lbs of bricks and weighted it down, transducer settings would be off therefore my car will raise till it is level again. When I
remove the 500lbs of bricks, my values will be off again and the car will lower itself till its level again.
Whether i had links or star or whatever this routine will NOT change..
You can't fool a program, unless you alter some value or another and those alterations MUST lead you back to a certain referenced value..
These cars don't have any conscious idea they are lowered or not. Just like an Elevator has no idea which floor its on, or even cares whether its going up or down at any particular time. It simply relies on signals and inputs to match a pre set of parameters... Thats how everything in our world works..
Links=$ less than $200
Module= Fortune..
results= The same.
Let your conscious be your guide.
I write programs like this with my eyes closed that's how I eat.
Links are how I roll...
While I respect your strong feelings about links, I can assure you that there are no real facts that support either method. The only thing to go by is users with experience, and you will be hard pressed to find some with real fact to support the claim that there car failed solely because they used links instead of some other method.
What I find interesting is the fact that ALL W220's come stock with a adjustable link in the rear and yo never hear any complaints about rear shocks.Hmmm.
Anyway..
Since MOST users of any lowering method own cars between the years of 'Normal" airmatic issues, even if there were some real statistics taken they would be skewed by that fact alone.
Also take into consideration the Logical side of the discussion and the physical side.
Physically there IS a window on ANY airshock that maximizes the shocks ablilty to withstand the weight it's supporting and at the same time maintain the integrity of the shock. I don;t think anyone here can give any exact data as to what that particular window is for these cars..
We do know that since the car is programed to lower itself 3/4 inches after 80mph, that the lower limit must be lower than 3/4 how much who knows?? But for quality and safety sake we must assume that the engineers who built this car didn't program it any where near a danger zone.
Then we look at the logical. This seems simple enough for me as a programmer because this is my area of expertise.. i think I explained this somewhere before but I can;t remember.
Anyhow, logically the basic program for the height of the car has to be based on these things.
1. Physical input from the two front height transducers ( analog )
2. Physical input from the rear height transducer(s) ( analog also )
3. a programmed set of references that are matched to the above inputs that send an output to the Airmatic system based on the difference between these signals.
I hope that makes sense.
So the difference is that with STAR or a MODULE, When the references (3) are changed the car will adjust until the physical inputs (1 and 2) are correct again to the 'new" references
With the links, the Physical input values(1 and 2) are changed by the same amount, and the car will adjust itself till the inputs are correct again to the "original" references.(3)
the rest of the program for squatting, etc.. never changes in whether method because they all correspond to the requests of main function which stays the same no matter what.
So whomever says its not the same, well, fundamentally they are incorrect.
Looking at it in reverse,
If I loaded my car with 500lbs of bricks and weighted it down, transducer settings would be off therefore my car will raise till it is level again. When I
remove the 500lbs of bricks, my values will be off again and the car will lower itself till its level again.
Whether i had links or star or whatever this routine will NOT change..
You can't fool a program, unless you alter some value or another and those alterations MUST lead you back to a certain referenced value..
These cars don't have any conscious idea they are lowered or not. Just like an Elevator has no idea which floor its on, or even cares whether its going up or down at any particular time. It simply relies on signals and inputs to match a pre set of parameters... Thats how everything in our world works..
Links=$ less than $200
Module= Fortune..
results= The same.
Let your conscious be your guide.
I write programs like this with my eyes closed that's how I eat.
Links are how I roll...
----not knowing anything about the subject at hand....it makes sense



5 years on my S500 and no problems and links on my E55 too.