LS460l Test Drive
As far as the Lexus looking like the ES, I don't have any problem with that. Mercedes does similar things with their models. The current W203 C-Class looks like the W220 S-Class, and the previous W202 C-Class resembeled the W140 S. Take a look at the spyshots of the 2008 W204 C-Class and you will see MB modeled it after the new W221 S. What i do have a problem with is the Lexus looking like or sharing any parts with their cheaper line Toyota. This is what I don't like about Japanese luxury cars, they always seem to feel a little too much like their their cheaper family of cars.
MB has been good about keeping the part sharing one-way from MB to Chrysler. That may change in the future--I recently read an article about how Damiler-Chrylser will start manufacturing new V6s in the US for both MB and Chrysler. I hope this is wrong or I read it wrong, because I think that keeping the two separte has been a key to keeping MB successful.
It seems a good time to recall the VW Phaeton. That was a superb luxury car (still is, where you can buy it). Superb features. Good powertrains. Too heavy by half-a-ton, but still a a good car. It would have sold well as an Audi A8/A10. It probably could have been its own brand, sold it as a new Horch, and done well. People couldn't get past the $90,000 for a VOLKSWAGEN! thing, even if it was a great car built a dedicated facility that has since been built Bentleys. So it flops. Contrast this with Toyota, who created a luxury brand so that people wouldn't have to have a Toyota badge on their 50-grand car, and it sells like hotcakes. Lexus is the top luxury brand in America; I believe the LS is the best-seller in the top-flight luxury class in the States. Clearly, they're doing something right.
Germans do not have the monopoly on good design and engineering. Their cars are typically sportier, have more of a presence, etc., but I have heard enough horror stories about German engineering gone awry, or just over-engineered. All the evidence I have seen says that Japanese cars as well-put together as any vehicles on the road. Frankly, European marques have for too long had a ridiculous institutional arrogance; M-B and Volvo both said they weren't worried at all about Lexus and Infiniti when the brands were created. Oops. Maybe if they (like some of the people on this board) hadn't been so caught up in the assumption that the Japanese car companies, makers of rice-burners, couldn't build a "real" luxury car, they wouldn't have lost so much market share to them, hmmm?
MB didn't take the W220 and say we will improve the quality faults and do a facelift since it had some pretty nice classic S class lines. No...they started fresh and built a new design shocking long time S lovers with "wheel flares" and bold lines and a powerful front end. They designed an egonomic COMAND system, even being accused of copying the BMW interior. In spite of knowing that they would be so accused, they created the cleanest and most workable, high quality interior in a luxury sedan. They upgraded the technology to the current state of the art with the seating being honored for it's quality and comfort.
To quote a second time: "Build a car with it's own pesonality and character...one that stands on it's own base and is different." That's exactly what they do! and you complain about it! They don't make overtly sporty cars, they don't make the sort of luxury car YOU would want to buy (and so you say no-one else shoudl either), they make the sort of luxury car that I want to buy. That's their base, and that's what's different. They are chasing a different buyer, arguably the sort of buyer M-B used to have before they decided to fight Sportiness Wars with BMW. And good for Lexus for not charging an arm and a leg extra for a new design. The fact that LS's are less expensive than the S-Class is something to applaud, not sneer at. Here's an interesting factoid: a Camry bought in 1995 cost MORE in non-constant dollars than the Camry sold in '02, despite two redesigns in that period. When adjusted for inflation, the difference is even more staggering. I have yet to fully understand how Toyota/Leuxus do it, but I suspect it has lots to do with their managment philosophy of constant incremental improvement, and the general Japanese cultural imperative of subdued minimalism.
You are correct in some respects about the styling. Lexus always aped M-B on the LS designs. This one, while it has some elements, to put it no higher, from other Japanese vehicles, is a more integrated approach that attempts to forge Lexus's own design aesthetic. They are, after all, only 17 years old. It takes time to build a brand identity, and more time to decide how to shape and mold the design to reflect that identity, and still more time to decide and react to what customers want in the styling and design. I think Lexus design is more integrated and unique now than it has been in the past, as Robert Cumberford has noted, although they still borrow liberally at times. The LS, after all, has a Hoffmeister kink.
Appealing to the "gimmick" thing is bit disingenuous, since so many people here and at MBUSA are harping on about all the new features on the W221, from the Distronic Plus with brake intervention (pioneered by Acura, by the way) to the night-vision system. ALL luxury cars are becoming about gimmicks. It's just part of the game to woo buyers. Because of course when M-B went from 5 speeds to 7 in their transmissions, it wasn't just to one-up BMW, right?
The speakers thing was kinda funny. I know it may seem silly to you, but Lexus has always been known for their killer sound systems from Mark Levinson, which are probably the best in the industry. That's just a part of what Lexus is. One may as well mock Mercedes for making an AMG version of every damned vehicle they sell, even the R-Class minivan-***-wagons (and that's *** in the Latin sense, so don't titillated, people). Bad example, although true. But quiet cabins with superb auditory environments ARE just a part of Lexus, just like sporty handling is part and parcel of the BMW experience.
Lexus is growing up. They're finding a design direction after years of mish-mashed design themes, and honing what it is they do, while gradually expanding the franchise with sportier offerings like the IS, and the sportier-than-last-time LS. The LF-A should help this along substantially when it arrives in a year or so. They aren't in any hurry; Japanese companies always take the long view, and Lexus is no exception. I wish they'd just move a little faster on a V-12 LS, but the LS 600h L should be plenty of car when it arrives in the spring. They don't lead in much, but they certainly have a head-start in luxury hybrids, which will be handy for them: aside from fuel economy and emissions advantages, electric motors give great off-the-line power at very low revs. It'll be very interesting to see where Lexus is 5 years from now.
pmb600: I hope to God you're wrong. The last thing Mercedes needs is engines and parts built by Chrysler. I can see it now: rednecks pulling up alongside AMG sedans at traffic lights: "That thing got a Hemi?" And the furiously-blushing owner, having to nod as he fires up the Dodge Ram truck engine and rumbles off the line, hand-built by robots operated by Fred and Joe.
As far as the Lexus looking like the ES, I don't have any problem with that. Mercedes does similar things with their models. The current W203 C-Class looks like the W220 S-Class, and the previous W202 C-Class resembeled the W140 S. Take a look at the spyshots of the 2008 W204 C-Class and you will see MB modeled it after the new W221 S. What i do have a problem with is the Lexus looking like or sharing any parts with their cheaper line Toyota. This is what I don't like about Japanese luxury cars, they always seem to feel a little too much like their their cheaper family of cars.
MB has been good about keeping the part sharing one-way from MB to Chrysler. That may change in the future--I recently read an article about how Damiler-Chrylser will start manufacturing new V6s in the US for both MB and Chrysler. I hope this is wrong or I read it wrong, because I think that keeping the two separte has been a key to keeping MB successful.
P.S. The white SL is gorgeous, I don't see them very often but I would get one if I could (same goes for a black w221
)
...I forgot to mention in the earlier post that I couldn't test drive the LS460 because the last two they had, had been sold just that day and were in the service area (which is where they took me to look at car
) they had a white and a greyish green color called
....but back on topic, they said they already had 10 orders on their incoming inventory....so basically these cars are selling fast...my only complaint is not having AWD in the 460 but only the 600h, thats the only thing that would push to a S550 4-matic which would be around 100k and if I were spending 100k I could just get the 600h...regardless i still want one
haha
It seems a good time to recall the VW Phaeton. That was a superb luxury car (still is, where you can buy it). Superb features. Good powertrains. Too heavy by half-a-ton, but still a a good car. It would have sold well as an Audi A8/A10. It probably could have been its own brand, sold it as a new Horch, and done well. People couldn't get past the $90,000 for a VOLKSWAGEN! thing, even if it was a great car built a dedicated facility that has since been built Bentleys. So it flops. Contrast this with Toyota, who created a luxury brand so that people wouldn't have to have a Toyota badge on their 50-grand car, and it sells like hotcakes. Lexus is the top luxury brand in America; I believe the LS is the best-seller in the top-flight luxury class in the States. Clearly, they're doing something right.
Germans do not have the monopoly on good design and engineering. Their cars are typically sportier, have more of a presence, etc., but I have heard enough horror stories about German engineering gone awry, or just over-engineered. All the evidence I have seen says that Japanese cars as well-put together as any vehicles on the road. Frankly, European marques have for too long had a ridiculous institutional arrogance; M-B and Volvo both said they weren't worried at all about Lexus and Infiniti when the brands were created. Oops. Maybe if they (like some of the people on this board) hadn't been so caught up in the assumption that the Japanese car companies, makers of rice-burners, couldn't build a "real" luxury car, they wouldn't have lost so much market share to them, hmmm?
Ummmm...no offense, NevadaJack, but you need to do some research. This is the most complete, ground-up redesign of the LS yet undertaken. It's a new plaform, a brand-new engine design, and a brand-new first-in-the-world 8-speed transmission. Is it totally ground-breaking? Of course not. That's not how Lexus does things, and people whine when they do. It's the Kaizen appoach, incremental improvements. But it is MUCH more than a "facelift".
To quote a second time: "Build a car with it's own pesonality and character...one that stands on it's own base and is different." That's exactly what they do! and you complain about it! They don't make overtly sporty cars, they don't make the sort of luxury car YOU would want to buy (and so you say no-one else shoudl either), they make the sort of luxury car that I want to buy. That's their base, and that's what's different. They are chasing a different buyer, arguably the sort of buyer M-B used to have before they decided to fight Sportiness Wars with BMW. And good for Lexus for not charging an arm and a leg extra for a new design. The fact that LS's are less expensive than the S-Class is something to applaud, not sneer at. Here's an interesting factoid: a Camry bought in 1995 cost MORE in non-constant dollars than the Camry sold in '02, despite two redesigns in that period. When adjusted for inflation, the difference is even more staggering. I have yet to fully understand how Toyota/Leuxus do it, but I suspect it has lots to do with their managment philosophy of constant incremental improvement, and the general Japanese cultural imperative of subdued minimalism.
You are correct in some respects about the styling. Lexus always aped M-B on the LS designs. This one, while it has some elements, to put it no higher, from other Japanese vehicles, is a more integrated approach that attempts to forge Lexus's own design aesthetic. They are, after all, only 17 years old. It takes time to build a brand identity, and more time to decide how to shape and mold the design to reflect that identity, and still more time to decide and react to what customers want in the styling and design. I think Lexus design is more integrated and unique now than it has been in the past, as Robert Cumberford has noted, although they still borrow liberally at times. The LS, after all, has a Hoffmeister kink.
Appealing to the "gimmick" thing is bit disingenuous, since so many people here and at MBUSA are harping on about all the new features on the W221, from the Distronic Plus with brake intervention (pioneered by Acura, by the way) to the night-vision system. ALL luxury cars are becoming about gimmicks. It's just part of the game to woo buyers. Because of course when M-B went from 5 speeds to 7 in their transmissions, it wasn't just to one-up BMW, right?
The speakers thing was kinda funny. I know it may seem silly to you, but Lexus has always been known for their killer sound systems from Mark Levinson, which are probably the best in the industry. That's just a part of what Lexus is. One may as well mock Mercedes for making an AMG version of every damned vehicle they sell, even the R-Class minivan-***-wagons (and that's *** in the Latin sense, so don't titillated, people). Bad example, although true. But quiet cabins with superb auditory environments ARE just a part of Lexus, just like sporty handling is part and parcel of the BMW experience.
Lexus is growing up. They're finding a design direction after years of mish-mashed design themes, and honing what it is they do, while gradually expanding the franchise with sportier offerings like the IS, and the sportier-than-last-time LS. The LF-A should help this along substantially when it arrives in a year or so. They aren't in any hurry; Japanese companies always take the long view, and Lexus is no exception. I wish they'd just move a little faster on a V-12 LS, but the LS 600h L should be plenty of car when it arrives in the spring. They don't lead in much, but they certainly have a head-start in luxury hybrids, which will be handy for them: aside from fuel economy and emissions advantages, electric motors give great off-the-line power at very low revs. It'll be very interesting to see where Lexus is 5 years from now.
pmb600: I hope to God you're wrong. The last thing Mercedes needs is engines and parts built by Chrysler. I can see it now: rednecks pulling up alongside AMG sedans at traffic lights: "That thing got a Hemi?" And the furiously-blushing owner, having to nod as he fires up the Dodge Ram truck engine and rumbles off the line, hand-built by robots operated by Fred and Joe.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Appealing to the "gimmick" thing is bit disingenuous, since so many people here and at MBUSA are harping on about all the new features on the W221, from the Distronic Plus with brake intervention (pioneered by Acura, by the way) to the night-vision system. ALL luxury cars are becoming about gimmicks. It's just part of the game to woo buyers. Because of course when M-B went from 5 speeds to 7 in their transmissions, it wasn't just to one-up BMW, right?
[QUOTE]Are you kidding me? Mercedes was the first with Distronic, which did brake itself way back in what the late 90's? Mercedes took it a step further and made the car stop completely, which IMO is a major improvement over the 1st generation of Distronic. The Acura still doesnt work as well as MBZ's version of Distronic, and I have driven my brothers RL extensively.
Please, Mercedes had been designing the 7G Tronic transmission for quite a while over BMW. BMW has outsourced its transmissions from GM in the past and if I am correct the 6speed transmission in the 7 series was developed with GM once again. Mercedes built the 7G in house, and has proven itself to be one hell of a transmission.
Not all cars are gimicks, NightAssist is a major breakthrough for night vision in cars and is quite safety feature that comes in when your headlights just dont reach far enough.
What has lexus invented?
Please, Mercedes had been designing the 7G Tronic transmission for quite a while over BMW. BMW has outsourced its transmissions from GM in the past and if I am correct the 6speed transmission in the 7 series was developed with GM once again. Mercedes built the 7G in house, and has proven itself to be one hell of a transmission.
Not all cars are gimicks, NightAssist is a major breakthrough for night vision in cars and is quite safety feature that comes in when your headlights just dont reach far enough.
What has lexus invented?
The six-speed slushbox in the new-line BMWs is by ZF, not GM. And I have no problem outsourcing trannies to experts, and ZF is one of the best. Although, I have to admit, the two-speed reverse system on the 7G is really clever.
As for the night assist, of course it's useful. Cadillac did it first in 2000, then LEXUS, then M-B, now BMW. My point to NevadaJack was that loading up on tech features is part of what makes luxury cars luxurious (at the time they're introduced; a point Jeremy Clarkson made very well in a review of an '03 S600). It's just a part of the market, and you can't get mad at Lexus for playing the game just like everybody else; you can't hype the 7G transmission and the night vision system on the S-Class, and then dismiss similar innovations like the Lexus-built 8-speed slushbox in the LS as "gimmicks".
What has Lexus/Toyota invented? The modern production gas-electric hybrid vehicle, for one thing. Toyota did it, then Lexus became the first maker of hybrid luxury vehicles, first with the RX and then with the GS. The first production-car 8-speed manumatic gearbox, of course. I believe they're the first to deploy a driver-monitoring system, which is nice, and the LS is also the first US-market call with auto-parallel-parking, and the first US-market car with a lane-holding feature (although not the first with a LDW), and the first car with rear knee airbags. It's a good start, considering that Lexus is just 17. I won't do the slap thing, don't worry.
I'm glad we've found peace at last. But, I just have to say, in regard to the thoroughbred thing.... No, I'll know in my heart that it's a stud horse. The 7-Series or a Quattroporte is a thoroughbred. Just playing with ya. I do like the S-Class, even though it wouldn't be my first choice in its class. I just wish we could get the turbodiesels, the SWB S63 model, and the granite trim option here in the States. THAT would get my attention.
http://blogs.automobilemag.com/10024...eo-/index.html
Scroll to the bottom and you will see a video. Needless to say my experience was very much the same. It only works in perfect conditions.
The LS certainly has prescene. Not as much as the W140 though.
The ES looks like a Camry.
The LS in person doesn't look like an Avalon. Sorry MB Fanatic

I'm stillllll waiting for the LS600, and see what differences slight body changes will make.
I said the LS and the Camry look alike, not the ES and Camry. Yes the ES is just a Camry in better clothing despite them not looking identical anymore.
I don't need to go back to a Lexus dealer to know the LS460 aren't the lookers the S-Class or A8 are. It is big and slab sided and in LS460 SWB form downright goofy looking.
M
The LS could look like a damn Mini-Cooper, people would still post pics side by side and say "Looks just like a Camry". That 6 year old argument was new back in the early 90s.....let it go.....
As for FACTS, I have never read an article in Car and Driver or Motor Trend or any mag where the LS lost to the S-class. The S-class usually ranks pretty low in the rankings actually. That is a FACT.
Here just one article where the old S-class was 6th out of 6 cars, the LS won.
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...ans-page2.html
Now I am not saying at all, the LS is perfect and the S is bad. Not at all. Both are IMO just fantastic examples of top luxury from each country. Nothing says I've made it like a S-class.
Considering the S-class has what, 9 generations and the LS is only 17 years young, I think what Lexus has accomplished is astounding.
All this baseless bashing on the LS is childish. Clearly people will not think it is the best and will buy the S/7 or even A8. It is very viable competition and has been for SOMETIME NOW.
Here is the LS with the Tom's bodykit...

Looks like something you'd put on a Civic, but it does give the car something extra it doesn't have in stock from. An AMG S550 though would stomp it throughly in looks department.
The S-Class doesn't always rank low in a comparo, one member of the S-Class has vs. the LS during the last few years, the S430. You say you've never seen a comparo in which the LS lost to an S-Class? You need to find the issue in which MT compared the LS430 to the S500. Guess who won? The S500. This was when the LS430 first came out so I'd say it was a late 2000 or early 2001 issue. I'll find it if you don't believe me.
M
I agree with you about the Quattroporte as far as performance goes, but that car while gorgeous and stunning to behold won't cut it as a luxury car like AMG Benz will. It needs a smoother automatic mode or a true automatic. I agree though compared to say a S63 AMG the Maser is a much more exciting car, it is afterall a 4-door Ferrari in everything but name.
M
M
I remember I think someone posted pics of the 04+ LS (which was supposed to get a small refresh) and I mistook it for the non-refresh one. Sad thing
I felt stupid after that.
BACK TO THE LS...I was at the Lex dealership today and had them pull the ES up right next to it and I was disappointed. The front ends of the two cars were differentiable but from halfway back the ES and LS are very similar. The lines on the side of the car are very similar and the same with the lights on the back. The tailpipes are different but besides that I found them very comparable. The inside of the LS resembles the old LS more than I think it should, especially for its big remodel. I was unable to drive the car because it was sold, it was the only one they had (LS 460) swb. The interior of the car does maintain a high level of craftsmanship and the smooth refinement you can expect from a Lex and if you like shiny wood the LS cannot be beat. Sorry, but the S wins hands down in aesthetics, leather quality, appeal, and layout.
M
M
http://blogs.automobilemag.com/10024...eo-/index.html
Scroll to the bottom and you will see a video. Needless to say my experience was very much the same. It only works in perfect conditions.
They really are the most subtle facelifts. I think they only bother so they can say "the brand-new 2005 Camry". Then again, that's what all facelifts are for. Maybe the engineers just get bored between redesigns. At least when Audi does a refresh, you can tell. You have to rub your eyes to try to work the visual out of your head, but at least you can tell.And I do just have to give a shout-out to Lexus on their marketing. Infiniti shows trees and ponds and such B-S, but Lexus did the champagne glass pyramid, which everyone remembers, and they wrote a couple awesome poems when the GS came out. Sorry if I sound geeky here, but I love poetry anyway, and this was funny and fantastic at the same time, and I still remember it. These were to celebrate the "wicked Lexus motif" and date to 1998, running in car mags with storm clouds in the background. Lexus, the car of English majors and wanna-be English majors. lol. I love it when car companies can tell a serious point and still have a sense of humor, which is why BMW-MINI marketing is so priceless.
Distant thunder, cold as stone,
a V8 screams down from its throne,
one by one each car succumbs,
as Something Wicked This Way Comes
And the second:
Trembling gravel turns askance,
Where'er its glittering valves doth dance,
and pliant pavement quickly numbs,
Something Wicked This Way Comes.
Anybody know of any others? I think marketing has played a key role in Lexus's growth, precisely because it had to overcome the interia of being seen as just another Japanese car. Even though the cars aren't generally exciting, and so they don't typically do the M-B C-Class racing on a bridge thing, the marketing defines very precisely what the cars are about.
I still doubt I'd ever use the parallel parking assist, though, but then again, I don't drive such a large vehicle. I'd probably also want to turn off the lane-keeping thingamajiggy. I do wonder if their variable-ratio steering compares well to active steer. I would think M-B would go that route very soon; I'm surprised they didn't on the new S.
So today, with time on my hands I went to a dealership complex that sells both M-B and Lexus. I wanted to look over the new LS. Fortunately, there was a transporter there off-loading several new Lexus cars. I like to see how a car is put together from below. I was able to stand there, look up and compare LS460L, ES350 and GS AWD. Let me say to those who think LS is just a bigger ES or Camry, they should seek the same view. The LS is definitely cut from different and higher quality cloth.
Now to compare LS with S class. it is my opinion that the LS, in standard trim, gives away nothing to S550 in standard dress. The leather, wood and plastics are of very high quality. Likewise with overall fit and finish.
As to visual effect, I like the LS460 better than the LS460L.
I realize the the most direct comparison would be S550 to the LS460L. Comparing to S 550, especially from front and rear 3/4 view, says to me that LS460 has more "gravitas". That's just the way I see it.
I have not driven either car but that will come. I think M-B better hustle up a SWB S450 for the US market or they are going to loose a lot of business. Of course test dives would play a major part in the decision but the Lexus has to tried.

Infiniti's designs are different which = hot.
Germancar1 - the new ad is a throwback to the first ad where they had a LS400 on the dyno with a bunch of glasses on the hood and the car sped up to 140mph or something crazy like that

Infiniti has a lot of ads by Method Studios, google for Method Studios and watch their ads -- absolutley beautiful commercials.
Lexus has had their ups and downs with marketing. It seems like if they aren't pushing something 'revolutionary' like the LS400 (first gen) or the LS460 (fourth gen) the ads just suck. The 'scary' GS ad from a while ago (I think GS) sucked *****. The new GX LX RX ad they have now sucks. Eh.
The rain on the SC430 was nice, where the roof opened after the sun came out, but it became old after a while.
I hope Mercedes does not bring a S450. That's not cool.
Yes, I am selfish.




