2010+ clear/smoke sidemarker... Thoughts?




1) White LED, clear lens, (outer trim looks grey/chrome?)
2) White LED, smoke lens, (outer trim looks black)
3) Amber LED, clear lens (outer trim looks grey/chrome?)
3) Amber LED, smoke lens (outer trim looks black)
5) non led, clear

6) non led, smoke


2007-2009 style

Led on e class, but has more leds than S version.
Last edited by Jason B; Apr 27, 2014 at 11:42 PM.
Whenever I see a white car with any black or smoke lighting, it sticks out like a sore thumb to me. A black taillight looks like a missing taillight or hole on a white car. Just doesn't look right.
Those smoke or black lights will look like dark spots, black stickers, or holes in your bumper which takes away from the nice look of your car.
With a white car, go with clear lenses (not smoked), and chrome or silver (not black) housings.
Clear or amber lights is up to you. I'm leaning towards amber because it looks pretty nice and when you start to go to clear (in my opinion) you look like those guys with Civics that have put on the fart pipe mufflers and clear lenses all around. I think the amber looks great and it's easy for people to see.
On the other hand the lit up pics of the smoked/amber unit make it look pretty dark and I'd like to make sure whatever I choose is as bright as stock. Whatever choice you make please post pics of the results.
Last edited by ramos226; Apr 28, 2014 at 09:04 PM.
I have a black car and am trying to decide too. Have decided I don't like the LED ones with the bent "shape".. they look too much like fog lamps on the newer MB's and look out of place to me.. I like the 'regular' style side markers.
I might just replace my amber sidemarker with an amber LED bulb to get the brightness of an LED.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG







