2019 S560 4.0 Engine Mounts




Been a while since I posted, but I was wondering:
I am at 100K on my 2019 S560, and its been great, no real issues, very reliable.
I am going to bring her in for some work soon, and was wondering about the motor mounts.
I can get to the trans mount, no problem.
Is there any other way to do the front mounts without taking out the motor?
Thanks




Been a while since I posted, but I was wondering:
I am at 100K on my 2019 S560, and its been great, no real issues, very reliable.
I am going to bring her in for some work soon, and was wondering about the motor mounts.
I can get to the trans mount, no problem.
Is there any other way to do the front mounts without taking out the motor?
Thanks




I have to replace the trans mount as I get a 'bump' when it hit the gas hard from a dead stop.....
Trending Topics
Last edited by W205C43PFL; May 26, 2025 at 03:33 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Alpha European Autotech
Purchase Amsoil at 25% off from me
Chris Tran, Retired Alpha European Autotech Owner
Amsoil Independent Dealer #7236674
Last edited by JohnLane; May 27, 2025 at 07:07 AM.
Physics and my practical experience over 40 years of dealing with this junk agrees.
In a 221 car the engine mounts failed early and often. I got to do two sets of engine mounts to one transmission mount in that car.
My 222 S-65 with 145,000 miles on it has not needed engine mounts yet. Transmission mount is doing fine as well. I have it on the hoist looking every time it gets fresh fluids. Mercedes changed design of engine mounts for the 222. They finally got it right.
Last edited by JohnLane; May 28, 2025 at 01:43 PM.
What would be more likely be the case, is that the worn engine mounts would tend to shorten the life of the new transmission mount.
Last edited by MBNUT1; May 30, 2025 at 12:56 PM.
What would be more likely be the case, is that the worn engine mounts would tend to shorten the life of the new transmission mount.
So it is inconclusive? I mean the transmission mount is super easy to replace compared to the engine mounts so that might had been an incentive to replace it but looks like we can't come to a conclusion if it accelerates wear or decelerate wear of the engine mounts?
So it is inconclusive? I mean the transmission mount is super easy to replace compared to the engine mounts so that might had been an incentive to replace it but looks like we can't come to a conclusion if it accelerates wear or decelerate wear of the engine mounts?
Alpha European Autotech
Purchase Amsoil at 25% off from me
Chris Tran, Retired Alpha European Autotech Owner
Amsoil Independent Dealer #7236674
In the E-55 it was if the engine is very close to the front sway bar they were junk.
222 uses a different design that are not failing annually.
Before all the heat shields hiding the driveshaft we used to be able to look for if it was straight. Sagging in front? Trans mount is junk. But current cars have so many heat shields hiding it.
In the E-55 it was if the engine is very close to the front sway bar they were junk.
222 uses a different design that are not failing annually.
Before all the heat shields hiding the driveshaft we used to be able to look for if it was straight. Sagging in front? Trans mount is junk. But current cars have so many heat shields hiding it.






