What new or upcoming cars are on your radar?
In fairness the trans started leaking after they worked on it for the abrupt shifting so that could probably be hung on the dealership.
some gremlins in the software for sure. Every once in a while I would see something like an ABS error, which somehow
disappeared once you stopped and started the car. The second day I had the car, the 12v battery issued warnings not to
drive the car. Called the dealer they said drive it in. After 2 trips back to the dealer they finally replaced the battery.
Gotta say that the S580 rode so nice, it was super quiet and very comfy and with the big V8 power when you needed it.
Tough to trade in with only 7600 miles, but time to move on. Of course the new GLE 53 has a new MBUX interface
hopefully they tested the software more thoroughly in the next version.
Remember the GLS used to just be the GL, MB chose to change the naming structure so that “GL” meant SUV, and the letter at the end denoted the size relative to the sedan lineup (C, E or S).
It’s like the EQS sedan, it’s nowhere near as nice as an S Class inside, but when you realize it’s not supposed to be “the S Class” that becomes less surprising. CLS was never an S Class…
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
GLS.
The S-Class of SUVs.
So it was just Ola Källenius himself saying it.
Remember the GLS used to just be the GL, MB chose to change the naming structure so that “GL” meant SUV, and the letter at the end denoted the size relative to the sedan lineup (C, E or S).
It’s like the EQS sedan, it’s nowhere near as nice as an S Class inside, but when you realize it’s not supposed to be “the S Class” that becomes less surprising. CLS was never an S Class…
In fairness the trans started leaking after they worked on it for the abrupt shifting so that could probably be hung on the dealership.
In fairness the trans started leaking after they worked on it for the abrupt shifting so that could probably be hung on the dealership.
GLS.
The S-Class of SUVs.
So it was just Ola Källenius himself saying it.
some gremlins in the software for sure. Every once in a while I would see something like an ABS error, which somehow
disappeared once you stopped and started the car. The second day I had the car, the 12v battery issued warnings not to
drive the car. Called the dealer they said drive it in. After 2 trips back to the dealer they finally replaced the battery.
Gotta say that the S580 rode so nice, it was super quiet and very comfy and with the big V8 power when you needed it.
Tough to trade in with only 7600 miles, but time to move on. Of course the new GLE 53 has a new MBUX interface
hopefully they tested the software more thoroughly in the next version.
https://mbworld.org/forums/gle-class...t-you-sow.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/s-class-w...-new-s500.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/gle-class...ke-review.html
Yeah, its just marketing speak. The GLS is not the S Class of SUVs, the S Class is the highest price car in its segment and MB clearly feels their cache and product commands that premium, and its also the best selling car so clearly they are right. The GLS is positioned well below the Range Rover in price and the product reflects that price difference in a few places. If MB had truly wanted to make the GLS the best in the segment, they would have targeted RR for cost and content. The GLS is a family vehicle, not an outright luxury/image vehicle like the RR. Theres a practicality there that isnt there in the RR.
I thought so, it did get me curious especially if they tout the GLS as the S-Class of SUVs, customers that wanted an SUV coming from an S-Class sedan buys one and disappointed that it isn't what they expected, they would had thought the newer S-Class isn't the same as the previous generation S-Class in terms of ride and probably refinement and disappointed with the S-Class' future therefore jump to competitors. I wonder what improvements if any did the Maybach GLS and EQS SUV and Maybach EQS SUV did they make? Thanks for answering my question.
Still, I don't think it's punishing at all as it is; if the 24 improves on that it certainly wouldn't bother me. Porsche actually handles big hits better with no crashing bang like you get here. All of them do that better.
I'm a couple years out of one now so I don't want to get too specific. I'd get PDCC, can't remember if the Turbo comes with it but it's great for both ride quality and it keeps it flatter when you decide to have fun. It pushes that sport sedan feeling further before you start noticing you're in an SUV.
To go back to the ride; I didn't leave Porsche because I thought it wasn't comfortable and I've considered the Cayenne as the next car myself. I'm not expecting it to have this kind of isolation but I think Porsche does very well at giving you a normal mode that is relatively cushy. But S class level cush, that's hard to believe.
When I have complained to dealers they send the stupid video of the GT3 on a track proving that squealing is good for performance.
That may be true, but never again will I drive a luxury vehicle that sounds like a garbage truck.
When I have complained to dealers they send the stupid video of the GT3 on a track proving that squealing is good for performance.
That may be true, but never again will I drive a luxury vehicle that sounds like a garbage truck.
I ended up driving the car around with the windows up at all times. Just found it to be too annoying.
I found a thread on the Cayenne: https://rennlist.com/forums/cayenne-...al-pscb-9.html
Funny though that their electric Taycan doesn't seem have issues with brake squeal.















