2002 S55 AMG and the S550
Which sedan is considered "faster"? I already know the 2002 S55 AMG has a 5.5 Liter Natural V8 making 354 Horses with an unknown amount of torque.
The S550 also has a V-8 with 382 Horses. From what I've seen and heard, the S550 accelerates slightly faster (5.4 seconds to 60 mph) while the AMG goes 5.7 seconds to 60 mph.
As a general question, which is basically faster? I'm thinking both cars have simliar amounts of torque too and almost the same weight?
I just wanted to also know if anybody else here on this board has an older S55 AMG.
Which sedan is considered "faster"? I already know the 2002 S55 AMG has a 5.5 Liter Natural V8 making 354 Horses with an unknown amount of torque.
The S550 also has a V-8 with 382 Horses. From what I've seen and heard, the S550 accelerates slightly faster (5.4 seconds to 60 mph) while the AMG goes 5.7 seconds to 60 mph.
As a general question, which is basically faster? I'm thinking both cars have simliar amounts of torque too and almost the same weight?
I just wanted to also know if anybody else here on this board has an older S55 AMG.

I strongly believe a 01-02 S55 will win head to head. I have a 2001 Road & Track, and the 01 S55 performance numbers are better from 0-80, and 0-100. Not to mention the 1/4 mile(tenth of a sec). Performance numbers will vary by magazine.
And finally, seeing that the 5550 has a 500 pound(est) disadvantage in total weight, the S55 should squeak by.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I'm into Japanese food.
I'm into Japanese food.

By the way, I think the S550 should be quicker than the 02 S 55. Other than weight, the S550 prety much outdoes [what to it is a grandpa in car generations] the older model by several degrees of separation.
1) one touch doesnt work for windows or sun roof.
2) gas gauge doesnt work
3) tailights stay on, i believe its the brake lights.
so i keep disconnecting the negative so the tailights dont drain the battery. what can be the problem? please help!!!








