SL/R231: Unsprung weight & ride comfort...how do they relate?
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,400
Received 3,684 Likes
on
2,110 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
Unsprung weight & ride comfort...how do they relate?
With recent threads about upgrading non-AMG R231 models to CCB brakes and mounting forged wheels in place of cast wheels, both of which upgrades offer significant reductions in unsprung weight, it got me thinking as to how unsprung weight affects ride comfort. I’ve heard so much about how less unsprung weight improves “handling,” but what about comfort, as in absorbing road imperfections, etc.?
Since I am giving thought to how I might go with my incoming SL450 with ABC, let’s use that car as a basis for my question:
With all other things being equal, how do we think ride comfort would compare between a car equipped with stock brakes, 18” wheels and appropriate tires, to the same car equipped with CCB & the Fuchs, forged 19” & 20” staggered wheels from the SL65, with appropriate tires?
Not being a technical car guy, I’ll apologize in advance, if I am asking for a simple answer to a complicated question.
Since I am giving thought to how I might go with my incoming SL450 with ABC, let’s use that car as a basis for my question:
With all other things being equal, how do we think ride comfort would compare between a car equipped with stock brakes, 18” wheels and appropriate tires, to the same car equipped with CCB & the Fuchs, forged 19” & 20” staggered wheels from the SL65, with appropriate tires?
Not being a technical car guy, I’ll apologize in advance, if I am asking for a simple answer to a complicated question.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
complicated question since ride comfort is subjective.
big fat sidewall tires can give a nice smooth ride since they absord bumps in road better then lo-profile.
Spongy "boat-like" is comfy and more related to springs and shocks - think 70's caddy - Land yachts if you have bad back that is what you want.
big fat sidewall tires can give a nice smooth ride since they absord bumps in road better then lo-profile.
Spongy "boat-like" is comfy and more related to springs and shocks - think 70's caddy - Land yachts if you have bad back that is what you want.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,447
Received 328 Likes
on
292 Posts
2013 SL550 (Lux Sport), 2006 CL55 AMG (Muscle). S550 (Wife's Sedan)
Here is the 231 'COMFORT' forumula
For maximum COMFORT in your 231 SL Class, here are my (3) recommendations, and while these recommendations apply to both ABC and NON-ABC models, you'll find them particularly beneficial and effective on Non-ABC-equipped 231's which are far more commonly seen and owned.:
1 - Use 18-inch Wheels/Tires for both front and rear, instead of 19" and/or 20" wheels and tires. There is actually a 17" MB-approved wheel option as well, but I don't recommend going with a wheel quite that small for cosmetic reasons, and besides the only 17: wheel that is 'approved by MB' is quite ugly. .
2 - Choose Non-Run Flat Tires such as the 'Ultra High Performance' Michelin Pilot A/S 3+ (W or Y speed rated). You'll note that treadwear ratings on Ultra High Performance A/S Tires are much higher than with 'Max Performance Summer Tires', so expect the benefit of a longer tread life as well as additional comfort by choosing the recommended tire type. 18" Wheels and Tires will be more resistant to road damage due to having more sidewall, than the larger 19" or 20" wheel and tire options.
All of the 18-inch wheels currently 'Approved by Mecedes-Benz' for use on the 231 SL Class can be found in the link I added below.
http://www.alloywheelsdirect.net/mer.../all/price_asc
3 - Finally, be sure to keep the 231's Suspension Setting in 'Comfort Mode', even when selecting the "Sport Setting' for the transmission, (The E/S/M Selector Button) is the transmission setting, whereas the Comfort/Sport Button is the Suspension Setting. The latter button will cause a much rougher ride when a 'Sport' Suspension Setting has been selected.
1 - Use 18-inch Wheels/Tires for both front and rear, instead of 19" and/or 20" wheels and tires. There is actually a 17" MB-approved wheel option as well, but I don't recommend going with a wheel quite that small for cosmetic reasons, and besides the only 17: wheel that is 'approved by MB' is quite ugly. .
2 - Choose Non-Run Flat Tires such as the 'Ultra High Performance' Michelin Pilot A/S 3+ (W or Y speed rated). You'll note that treadwear ratings on Ultra High Performance A/S Tires are much higher than with 'Max Performance Summer Tires', so expect the benefit of a longer tread life as well as additional comfort by choosing the recommended tire type. 18" Wheels and Tires will be more resistant to road damage due to having more sidewall, than the larger 19" or 20" wheel and tire options.
All of the 18-inch wheels currently 'Approved by Mecedes-Benz' for use on the 231 SL Class can be found in the link I added below.
http://www.alloywheelsdirect.net/mer.../all/price_asc
3 - Finally, be sure to keep the 231's Suspension Setting in 'Comfort Mode', even when selecting the "Sport Setting' for the transmission, (The E/S/M Selector Button) is the transmission setting, whereas the Comfort/Sport Button is the Suspension Setting. The latter button will cause a much rougher ride when a 'Sport' Suspension Setting has been selected.
Last edited by bob55; 01-21-2019 at 04:48 PM.
#4
Comfort is a very subjective evaluation, depends a lot on your personal tolerance and the quality of your local roads, and does obviously come with performance (handling & weight) drawbacks. For maximum comfort, the more sidewall profile the better (and conversely, the smaller the wheel), but attempting to quantify the percentage comfort gained against the percentage handling lost is extremely difficult. There is a wonderful video by a professional tyre reviewer that evaluates 3 different wheel sizes with identical tyres on the same car but what he may feel is desirable may differ to your opinion. He also has a good video on the Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 4S and Cup 2 if you wish to see what effect tyre sidewall stiffness has on handling.
Last edited by D49; 01-21-2019 at 04:28 PM.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,400
Received 3,684 Likes
on
2,110 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
OK, I appreciate all the comments, but I guess I should try and clarify what I am asking.
I've always known that smaller wheel diameter and more sidewall depth almost always gives a more compliant ride. On my 2013 SL550, without ABC, I had 18" wheels with the Michelin A/S 3+ Y rated tires. The ride was good & quiet, but not nearly as great as the ride in my previous 2004 SL500 R230, which, of course, had ABC as standard equipment. It was pretty much JUST due to the ride quality of the non-ABC 2013 that I sold it last year.
So, I've ordered a new 2019 SL450 with ABC, which is coming in May. The dealer has agreed to swap the 19" wheels & tires for 18's, which is most likely the way I will go. BUT, the idea of doing something crazy like swapping out the stock brakes for the CCB, which would then require at least 19" wheels--if not the GORGEOUS AMG SL65 19"/20" staggered wheels, is VERY enticing, IF the ride quality won't get shot to hell. Anyway, it got me wondering, and again, here is the question, phrased differently:
How much of the harsher ride quality of the AMG 19"/20" staggered wheels, shod with appropriate tires, will be mitigated by the substantial reduction in unsprung weight?
I've always known that smaller wheel diameter and more sidewall depth almost always gives a more compliant ride. On my 2013 SL550, without ABC, I had 18" wheels with the Michelin A/S 3+ Y rated tires. The ride was good & quiet, but not nearly as great as the ride in my previous 2004 SL500 R230, which, of course, had ABC as standard equipment. It was pretty much JUST due to the ride quality of the non-ABC 2013 that I sold it last year.
So, I've ordered a new 2019 SL450 with ABC, which is coming in May. The dealer has agreed to swap the 19" wheels & tires for 18's, which is most likely the way I will go. BUT, the idea of doing something crazy like swapping out the stock brakes for the CCB, which would then require at least 19" wheels--if not the GORGEOUS AMG SL65 19"/20" staggered wheels, is VERY enticing, IF the ride quality won't get shot to hell. Anyway, it got me wondering, and again, here is the question, phrased differently:
How much of the harsher ride quality of the AMG 19"/20" staggered wheels, shod with appropriate tires, will be mitigated by the substantial reduction in unsprung weight?
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
unsprung wieght on ride quality is very minimal if noticeable at all... more likelay a plecabo effect..
do this.
DRive it with the 19s when you get it and change out week later to 18s with more sidewall.... you should be a bit happier
#7
I have never driven a R231 SL with 18" wheels, so I cannot directly speak about their ride quality. I can however speak about the difference between 19" and 20" at the rear of the car. The 20" forged rear option is for a wholly larger wheel diameter, keeping the exact same proportion of tyre sidewall as the 19". I drive my car daily and frankly believe that there was no change to ride comfort at all. I believe there are others on this forum (Wolfman?) who have swapped to the19/20" forged wheels as well who could perhaps offer their opinion. The change to the unsprung weight doesn't affect ride quality as much as it completely changes the car's responsiveness and handling. No SL is a SLS or a SLR, nor should a SL attempt to behave like one, but even a minor loss in unsprung weight completely changes how a car behaves. The best description of how I felt about my car afterwards was that is was much more nimble and awake than sleepy.
Have you driven a R231 SL on 19" with the current ABC suspension? If not, I would strongly recommend you do so, as the difference between springs and ABC in terms of ride comfort is dramatic. If you find that to be tolerable, from my experience there is no noticable decrease in comfort between that and the 19/20".
Have you driven a R231 SL on 19" with the current ABC suspension? If not, I would strongly recommend you do so, as the difference between springs and ABC in terms of ride comfort is dramatic. If you find that to be tolerable, from my experience there is no noticable decrease in comfort between that and the 19/20".
Last edited by D49; 01-21-2019 at 05:31 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,447
Received 328 Likes
on
292 Posts
2013 SL550 (Lux Sport), 2006 CL55 AMG (Muscle). S550 (Wife's Sedan)
Not really possible to answer such questions without actually road testing your new ABC-equipped 231 with the precise wheel/tire specs you mentioned and whatever suspension settings you might choose for the test..
I think 19":is risky enough, and with a 20" wheel/tire option you are 'just asking for' less ride comfort and more susceptibility to road damage form potholes and the like.
Only you can determine just how much risk of road damage you can handle, and just how much comfort you are willing to sacrafice or the sake of very expensive 'show car size' wheels.
If your 231 is going to be used as a 'daily driver' then I suggest you err on the side of practicality when it comes to the wheels and tires. A rough riding 231 will annoy you long after you have gotten past 'the wow factor' of a 20" wheel/tire option.
I think 19":is risky enough, and with a 20" wheel/tire option you are 'just asking for' less ride comfort and more susceptibility to road damage form potholes and the like.
Only you can determine just how much risk of road damage you can handle, and just how much comfort you are willing to sacrafice or the sake of very expensive 'show car size' wheels.
If your 231 is going to be used as a 'daily driver' then I suggest you err on the side of practicality when it comes to the wheels and tires. A rough riding 231 will annoy you long after you have gotten past 'the wow factor' of a 20" wheel/tire option.
Last edited by bob55; 01-22-2019 at 10:16 AM.
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Since the wheels and brakes are “below” or outboard of the springs and shocks is their weight considered unsprung?
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,400
Received 3,684 Likes
on
2,110 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
Have you driven a R231 SL on 19" with the current ABC suspension? If not, I would strongly recommend you do so, as the difference between springs and ABC in terms of ride comfort is dramatic. If you find that to be tolerable, from my experience there is no noticable decrease in comfort between that and the 19/20".
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,400
Received 3,684 Likes
on
2,110 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
Not really possible to answer such questions without actually road testing your new ABC-equipped 231 with the precise wheel/tire specs you mentioned and whatever suspension settings you might choose for the test..
I think 19":is risky enough, and with a 20" wheel/tire option you are 'just asking for' less ride comfort and more susceptibility to road damage form potholes and the like.
Only you can decide how much damage risk your can handle, and just how much comfort you are willing to give up for the sake of some expensive and huge 'show car' wheels.
If it's going to be used as a 'daily driver' then I suggest you err on the side of practicality when it comes to the wheels and tires. A rough riding 231 will keep annoying you long after you are over 'the great look' of a 20" wheel/tire option.
I think 19":is risky enough, and with a 20" wheel/tire option you are 'just asking for' less ride comfort and more susceptibility to road damage form potholes and the like.
Only you can decide how much damage risk your can handle, and just how much comfort you are willing to give up for the sake of some expensive and huge 'show car' wheels.
If it's going to be used as a 'daily driver' then I suggest you err on the side of practicality when it comes to the wheels and tires. A rough riding 231 will keep annoying you long after you are over 'the great look' of a 20" wheel/tire option.
#12
Super Moderator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,099
Received 3,301 Likes
on
2,047 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
OK, I appreciate all the comments, but I guess I should try and clarify what I am asking.
I've always known that smaller wheel diameter and more sidewall depth almost always gives a more compliant ride. On my 2013 SL550, without ABC, I had 18" wheels with the Michelin A/S 3+ Y rated tires. The ride was good & quiet, but not nearly as great as the ride in my previous 2004 SL500 R230, which, of course, had ABC as standard equipment. It was pretty much JUST due to the ride quality of the non-ABC 2013 that I sold it last year.
So, I've ordered a new 2019 SL450 with ABC, which is coming in May. The dealer has agreed to swap the 19" wheels & tires for 18's, which is most likely the way I will go. BUT, the idea of doing something crazy like swapping out the stock brakes for the CCB, which would then require at least 19" wheels--if not the GORGEOUS AMG SL65 19"/20" staggered wheels, is VERY enticing, IF the ride quality won't get shot to hell. Anyway, it got me wondering, and again, here is the question, phrased differently:
How much of the harsher ride quality of the AMG 19"/20" staggered wheels, shod with appropriate tires, will be mitigated by the substantial reduction in unsprung weight?
I've always known that smaller wheel diameter and more sidewall depth almost always gives a more compliant ride. On my 2013 SL550, without ABC, I had 18" wheels with the Michelin A/S 3+ Y rated tires. The ride was good & quiet, but not nearly as great as the ride in my previous 2004 SL500 R230, which, of course, had ABC as standard equipment. It was pretty much JUST due to the ride quality of the non-ABC 2013 that I sold it last year.
So, I've ordered a new 2019 SL450 with ABC, which is coming in May. The dealer has agreed to swap the 19" wheels & tires for 18's, which is most likely the way I will go. BUT, the idea of doing something crazy like swapping out the stock brakes for the CCB, which would then require at least 19" wheels--if not the GORGEOUS AMG SL65 19"/20" staggered wheels, is VERY enticing, IF the ride quality won't get shot to hell. Anyway, it got me wondering, and again, here is the question, phrased differently:
How much of the harsher ride quality of the AMG 19"/20" staggered wheels, shod with appropriate tires, will be mitigated by the substantial reduction in unsprung weight?
In terms of comfort, you will NOT gain anything. Simply get All season tires on either 18" or 19" wheels and set the car to Curve mode. This will given you by far the most comfortable ride.
Lower unsprung weight improves handling and the agility of the car. The car will feel much lighter on its feet which is good since the SL is heavy to begin with and the V8 is a bit front heavy. This is a great benefit when coupled with performance tires.
For a blend of capability, performance, handling and looks, I love the 19"/20" forged wheels with Michelin PS4s tires. All-season tires are good on the S-Class but the SL should sport better rubber
![Wink](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#13
Super Moderator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,099
Received 3,301 Likes
on
2,047 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
I have never driven a R231 SL with 18" wheels, so I cannot directly speak about their ride quality. I can however speak about the difference between 19" and 20" at the rear of the car. The 20" forged rear option is for a wholly larger wheel diameter, keeping the exact same proportion of tyre sidewall as the 19". I drive my car daily and frankly believe that there was no change to ride comfort at all. I believe there are others on this forum (Wolfman?) who have swapped to the19/20" forged wheels as well who could perhaps offer their opinion. The change to the unsprung weight doesn't affect ride quality as much as it completely changes the car's responsiveness and handling. No SL is a SLS or a SLR, nor should a SL attempt to behave like one, but even a minor loss in unsprung weight completely changes how a car behaves. The best description of how I felt about my car afterwards was that is was much more nimble and awake than sleepy.
Have you driven a R231 SL on 19" with the current ABC suspension? If not, I would strongly recommend you do so, as the difference between springs and ABC in terms of ride comfort is dramatic. If you find that to be tolerable, from my experience there is no noticable decrease in comfort between that and the 19/20".
Have you driven a R231 SL on 19" with the current ABC suspension? If not, I would strongly recommend you do so, as the difference between springs and ABC in terms of ride comfort is dramatic. If you find that to be tolerable, from my experience there is no noticable decrease in comfort between that and the 19/20".
I currently drive the SL with stock 19" wheels and Pirelli Sottozero snow tires (by design snow tires are softer tires); the car feels like a different car. It feels heavier and a bit more work to drive.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,400
Received 3,684 Likes
on
2,110 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
I don't have any experience with 18" wheels on the R231 but had the R230 with 18" & 19" wheels. We have forged wheels on the SL and E63s which also has Carbon Ceramics. SL has ABC which I love (a much discussed topic on this forum).
In terms of comfort, you will NOT gain anything. Simply get All season tires on either 18" or 19" wheels and set the car to Curve mode. This will given you by far the most comfortable ride.
Lower unsprung weight improves handling and the agility of the car. The car will feel much lighter on its feet which is good since the SL is heavy to begin with and the V8 is a bit front heavy. This is a great benefit when coupled with performance tires.
For a blend of capability, performance, handling and looks, I love the 19"/20" forged wheels with Michelin PS4s tires. All-season tires are good on the S-Class but the SL should sport better rubber![Wink](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
In terms of comfort, you will NOT gain anything. Simply get All season tires on either 18" or 19" wheels and set the car to Curve mode. This will given you by far the most comfortable ride.
Lower unsprung weight improves handling and the agility of the car. The car will feel much lighter on its feet which is good since the SL is heavy to begin with and the V8 is a bit front heavy. This is a great benefit when coupled with performance tires.
For a blend of capability, performance, handling and looks, I love the 19"/20" forged wheels with Michelin PS4s tires. All-season tires are good on the S-Class but the SL should sport better rubber
![Wink](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#15
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 641
Received 277 Likes
on
176 Posts
2019 E450 wagon: 2019 BMW 430i: 2013 Chevy Traverse: (departed)2013 SL550 & 2019 E450 cab
This is probably the most straight forward explanation that I can find on the effect of unsprung weight and the relationship to ride comfort; as noted above, tire aspect ratios, wheel diameters, and suspension type also come into play when making these evaluations:
The unsprung mass of a wheel offers a trade-off between a wheel's bump-following ability and its vibration isolation. Bumps and surface imperfections in the road cause tire compression, inducing a force on the unsprung mass. The unsprung mass then reacts to this force with movement of its own. The motion amplitude for short bumps is inversely proportional to the weight. A lighter wheel which readily rebounds from road bumps will have more grip and more constant grip when tracking over an imperfect road. For this reason, lighter wheels are sought especially for high-performance applications. However, the lighter wheel will soak up less vibration. The irregularities of the road surface will transfer to the cabin through the suspension and hence ride quality and road noise are worse. For longer bumps that the wheels follow, greater unsprung mass causes more energy to be absorbed by the wheels and makes the ride worse.
Pneumatic or elastic tires help by restoring some spring to the (otherwise) unsprung mass, but the damping possible from tire flexibility is limited by considerations of fuel economy and overheating. The shock absorbers, if any, also damp the spring motion and must be less stiff than would optimally damp the wheel bounce. So the wheels still vibrate after each bump before coming to rest. On dirt roads and on some softly paved roads, the induced motion generates small bumps, known as corrugations, washboarding or "corduroy" because they resemble smaller versions of the bumps in roads made of logs. These cause sustained wheel bounce in subsequent axles, enlarging the bumps.
High unsprung mass also exacerbates wheel control issues under hard acceleration or braking. If the vehicle does not have adequate wheel location in the vertical plane (such as a rear-wheel drive car with Hotchkiss drive, a live axle supported by simple leaf springs), vertical forces exerted by acceleration or hard braking combined with high unsprung mass can lead to severe wheel hop, compromising traction and steering control.
A beneficial effect of unsprung mass is that high frequency road irregularities, such as the gravel in an asphalt or concrete road surface, are isolated from the body more completely because the tires and springs act as separate filter stages, with the unsprung mass tending to uncouple them. Likewise, sound and vibration isolation is improved (at the expense of handling), in production automobiles, by the use of rubber bushings between the frame and suspension, by any flexibility in the frame or body work, and by the flexibility of the seats.
Hope that helps!
The unsprung mass of a wheel offers a trade-off between a wheel's bump-following ability and its vibration isolation. Bumps and surface imperfections in the road cause tire compression, inducing a force on the unsprung mass. The unsprung mass then reacts to this force with movement of its own. The motion amplitude for short bumps is inversely proportional to the weight. A lighter wheel which readily rebounds from road bumps will have more grip and more constant grip when tracking over an imperfect road. For this reason, lighter wheels are sought especially for high-performance applications. However, the lighter wheel will soak up less vibration. The irregularities of the road surface will transfer to the cabin through the suspension and hence ride quality and road noise are worse. For longer bumps that the wheels follow, greater unsprung mass causes more energy to be absorbed by the wheels and makes the ride worse.
Pneumatic or elastic tires help by restoring some spring to the (otherwise) unsprung mass, but the damping possible from tire flexibility is limited by considerations of fuel economy and overheating. The shock absorbers, if any, also damp the spring motion and must be less stiff than would optimally damp the wheel bounce. So the wheels still vibrate after each bump before coming to rest. On dirt roads and on some softly paved roads, the induced motion generates small bumps, known as corrugations, washboarding or "corduroy" because they resemble smaller versions of the bumps in roads made of logs. These cause sustained wheel bounce in subsequent axles, enlarging the bumps.
High unsprung mass also exacerbates wheel control issues under hard acceleration or braking. If the vehicle does not have adequate wheel location in the vertical plane (such as a rear-wheel drive car with Hotchkiss drive, a live axle supported by simple leaf springs), vertical forces exerted by acceleration or hard braking combined with high unsprung mass can lead to severe wheel hop, compromising traction and steering control.
A beneficial effect of unsprung mass is that high frequency road irregularities, such as the gravel in an asphalt or concrete road surface, are isolated from the body more completely because the tires and springs act as separate filter stages, with the unsprung mass tending to uncouple them. Likewise, sound and vibration isolation is improved (at the expense of handling), in production automobiles, by the use of rubber bushings between the frame and suspension, by any flexibility in the frame or body work, and by the flexibility of the seats.
Hope that helps!
The following 3 users liked this post by TennesseeZ4:
#16
Super Moderator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,099
Received 3,301 Likes
on
2,047 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,400
Received 3,684 Likes
on
2,110 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
#18
Super Member
I had a 2004 R32 VW that came with 18x7 cast wheels. I replaced those wheels with identically-sized forged BBS wheels that were 6lbs lighter (each). The first time I drove the car with the BBS wheels on it, I had gone less than half of a block down the bumpy road by my house when I realized how much better the ride quality was over those bumps that I was used to with the standard cast wheels. In fact, the improvement in ride quality was the main difference that I noticed. The suspension (especially the shocks) just has an easier time dealing with less un-sprung weight.
#19
Super Member
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,400
Received 3,684 Likes
on
2,110 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
I'm sorry if I'm misunderstanding you, but are you under the impression that those larger wheels will weigh less than the standard smaller ones? Why would this be true? Unless the AMGs are forged and unusually light, there's not much chance of them being any meaningful amount lighter than your stock 19s...
Last edited by Streamliner; 01-26-2019 at 01:51 PM.
#21
2015 and 2016 rear springs
Are the rear suspension springs of the 2015 and 2016 SL550 identical? HR lists lowering springs only for SL550 up to 2015, nothing for 2016, 2017 or 2018. I bought the HR springs for the SL550, but I am not sure they will fit my 2016 car. Anyone can help?
#22
Super Member
I do stand corrected. I left the CC brakes out altogether. Though the added cost would be heinous, that big a difference in unsprung weight would definitely be noticeable...assuming you could test drive both setups in an A/B comparison.
Last edited by Dr. Manhattan; 02-01-2019 at 02:59 AM.