SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: 360 spider or gallardo spyder?
the 360s are 2003s with about 5k miles. the gallardo is a 2006 with about 200 miles.
all three have the automatic transmission feature, and i think are loaded. actually, one of the ferraris lacks some SPORT switch, which i'm fairly sure i won't miss.
the ferraris are about 175k; the lambo is about 250k.
what are your thoughts?
My choice is the lambo..more exclusive.. more reliable Audi v10 engine, maybe more practical for driving 2-3x a week vs. 360, maybe others can chime in and provide personal experiences.
i've been hearing that ferrari drivers typically log about 200 miles monthly on their cars. does that sound right?
you're driving an infiniti G35? please let me know your thoughts about it because one of the young ladies in our office wants the coupe, and i'm trying to arrange it for her.
if anybody knows recent sales histories for the 360 and gallardo, please let me know whether the numbers seem reasonable. thanks!
I have seen the Lambos in DC, and northern va, and speaking to several sources, they do say lambo are actually practical cars. Shocking to hear such an exotic car can be driven each day.
local prices in northern va/dc area
2004 - lambo 11K miles - 139,000 (silver)
2005 - lambo 4K miles - 175,000 (yellow)
not sure about 360 prices, but I think you may find good deals especially since the 430 is out and it's the hot car right now.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
haha.. And I'd actually go w/ the 360 merely because it is more car for your buck... The Gallardo is guaranteed to drop in value once the Spyder's become more prevalant.. And I guarantee that's happening soon. 360's in general always hold their value.. On top of that, if you've ever seen the Gallardo or 360 in person, the Gallardo spyder just looks funny, Lambo's usually have dated designs whereas ferrari's are just classicly beautiful. The only spyder lambo makes that looks good is the Murcielago, which is one 230K piece of ****. Oh, and if you want a nicer interior along with better reliability -- the Ferrari's the way to go. I wouldn't pay more than $160K for a 360 spyder though in the 2002 range..
my GF is pretty much a full-time occupation. but with my spare time, i manage a bit of tech development.
FYI, i was wrong about the number of white G-spyders. purportedly, the first one was purchased by a rocker guitarist and kept here in S FL. the second by a boca guy. the third, perhaps by me.
i feel similarly about the classic beauty of the ferrari; it looks like an adult's car. the gallardo looks more like a kid's car.
i've never had either and i'm bound to decide more emotionally that practically. if the 360 is more headache, then i'd lean toward the G. if there's only one thing i cannot abide, it's needless hassle.
Last edited by david_101; Jul 28, 2006 at 09:37 PM.
I don't own a 360 - and wouldn't. The F430 would be the version of that model to own.
Drive 'em both - it is going to be your car, and it's your money.
I will soon be taking delivery of both a Gallardo coupe and a Spyder. I will have to get into the cars and do some amount of driving to see how much I like the new Gallardo.
The Pearl White was my color choice for the Spyder.



the gallardo looks super exotic. if not, the black ferrari.



