SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL 63 slow?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-06-2009, 08:23 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
SL 63 slow?

Hi, I have just driven a SL65, but preferred my SL55, more exhaust rumble
and more nimble. I am now thinking of the SL63, I have heard they make
a nice noise and look good. However on the downside several members
had indicated that the SL55 is faster, and I believe the 63 can't be tuned.
Any comments would be appreciated.
Old 03-06-2009, 09:23 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmf003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
'03 SL55
Originally Posted by sound 8
Hi, I have just driven a SL65, but preferred my SL55, more exhaust rumble
and more nimble. I am now thinking of the SL63, I have heard they make
a nice noise and look good. However on the downside several members
had indicated that the SL55 is faster, and I believe the 63 can't be tuned.
Any comments would be appreciated.
I've not driven an SL63 so I don't have personal experience but reported times for stock SL63s are in the same neighborhood as stock SL55s, e.g. http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/hot_lists/high_performance/mercedes_benz_amg_performance/2009_mercedes_benz_sl63_amg_road_test/(page)/1

I have heard the SL63 on the road and can confirm the exhaust sound is heavenly.

ECU tunes and other tuning products are becoming available for the 6.2L engines, e.g. this Renntech-tuned C63 was able to run 1/4 mile in 11.57 seconds trapping at 120.91mph: https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...le-record.html

Last edited by jmf003; 03-06-2009 at 09:26 AM.
Old 03-06-2009, 11:02 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rsr911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,289
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2003 AMG SL55, 2002 AMG CLK55, 2002 AMG ML55, 2005 ML350, 1995 S320 LWB - totaled
Reviews from the pros

5th gear
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2gAh...eature=related

Top Gear Australia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYqu9oTTj6g

Both loved the SL63 both said it handles better, sounds better.

Both liked the SL55 more. It was the engine!!!!
Old 03-06-2009, 11:46 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
IngenereAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
I own a SL55 and we have tuned a number of SL63s, so I have had some seat time, both in our client's car as well as when we were developing the tuning.

The 63 is a step forward.... in the overall car, and especially the gearbox. It is brilliant. Engine wise, I still think the 55 is the ticket. I love the power delivery and the torque. I think the 55 has more character. The 63 is great, with a sound to die for, but I still have a 55 in my garage.... for whatever that is worth!
Old 03-06-2009, 02:19 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Thanks guys, looks like the only way to find out is to drive one.
I hope it does not drive like the SL65 I drove. Can anyone give me an idea
how much extra bhp you can get from a 63, and will it improve the torque.
Old 03-06-2009, 02:39 PM
  #6  
a_Y
Member
 
a_Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL63 AMG, E46 M3, CL500
if you are willing to pay, carlsson has a performance kit that bumps power from 525ps to 600ps and torque up from 630nm to 705nm...

i can understand how you guys like the low end torque of the 55k engine more, but this 6.2L is just way more free revving and the mct does transform the car! the combination of these 2 components and the better handling makes this a car that is closer to a true sports car. if you enjoy that then i think you will like the SL63 more. but if the only thing you are looking for is the monster torque then this wont be your car (not that it lacks the torque, i mean a 6.2L has tonnes of torque, but when you are already used to the 55k's monstrous torque then its a different story...)

to be honest i wasn't much of a fan of amg's until the c63 and sl63 came out with their respective gearboxes. i have driven older amgs and i can only perceive them as a much more powerful merc. the gearboxes were really disappointing. but with the new ones now, they just get better and better!

and yes you are right. i think the thing to do when deciding if you want a car or not is to test drive it yourself. i got a real good surprise when i test drove the c63 and e90m3. i drive an e46m3 in toronto and i guess i was biased to the m cars so i thought i would like the e90m3 more. after i test drove both, yes i agree that the handling is a bit better with the m3 but i just like the c63 so much more! now go test drive one and see for youself!

hope this helps!
Old 03-06-2009, 05:39 PM
  #7  
Member
 
pterion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 SL63 AMG, sliver
just drive an SL63, you will love it. Its worth it just to hear the engine.
I cant get enough of mine. It was 75 and sunny today for the first time since I bought it and my 10 minute drive home lasted an hour.
Old 03-06-2009, 07:43 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
lee7758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 658
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Porsche 911 Carerra 4S
Originally Posted by pterion
just drive an SL63, you will love it. Its worth it just to hear the engine.
I cant get enough of mine. It was 75 and sunny today for the first time since I bought it and my 10 minute drive home lasted an hour.
I totally agree with that! Once you drive the SL 63, you will love that. Especially the tranny ( MCT tranny )!!!!!
Old 03-06-2009, 10:19 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
AMG Dictator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK Black
I don't know, if you didn't like the power of the SL65, how are you going to be happy with a SL63?
Old 03-07-2009, 06:52 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by AMG Dictator
I don't know, if you didn't like the power of the SL65, how are you going to be happy with a SL63?
Thanks guys for the input, I would love the Carlsson kit but it's mega expensive.
To answer AMG Dictator, it's not a question of power. The SL65 felt smooth and quiet, and very unlike a sports car, more of a cruiser, my SL55 by
comparison felt nimble with a great exhaust note, far more like a sports car.
Driving the SL65 would be like driving my CL65 so I can't see the point.
However I get the Idea that the SL63 is even more raw than my 55, it has
aggressive looks and a great sound track according to other members.
I will find out, I have booked a test drive, just waiting for my dealer to get the car, then I will post my thoughts.
Old 03-07-2009, 04:22 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Fantasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car Whore
if you are looking for a sporty feeling, then definitely the SL63 will be better than the SL55.
power upgrades it goes to the 55K though.
Old 03-07-2009, 07:28 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
Imahobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Florida
Posts: 58
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55, Jeep SRT-8, CLS550
If you go 63, just paint the side vents.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL 63 slow?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 PM.