SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: What's the risk.
However here in the UK where it always rains is not the best place to floor
the loud pedal with damp roads. Nearly every time I am having fun I have
a moment where my nuts go tight. Nothing I have met has come near the
65 even an M5. You guys that have done serious mods must have cast
iron nerves. I am wondering whether to have mine re mapped.
What's it like to drive a modified one
Your input would be apreciated.
the car just does not put the power down nicely especially at speeds. slaloming at wot at 70 mph is ok in my book, but i can imagine how it can be unnerving for the average driver.
a pair of aftermarket lower control arms with stiffer bushings should improve things a lot. they are cheap and easy to install.
Last edited by alx; Nov 5, 2012 at 01:04 PM.
There's a line of thought that says if you can't use the power you already have, then why do you need more? (Just being provocative for a moment...)
Equally, another thought says that modest tuning is relatively inexpensive, and doesn't degrade other aspects of the car too much - like flexibility, economy, refinement, drivability etc - so what reason could you possibly have for NOT tuning?
Presumably you will fit a Johnson pump nomatter what, and live with that for a while - see how you get on with that?
I'll be curious to hear about whatever you do decide to do.
Nick
PS - I really wouldn't have thought that fitting upgraded suspension arms is going to solve those sorts of problems. Maybe take a look at the rear suspension and subframe bushes, and make sure they're in good condition. Maybe fit new tyres?
compared with the 65. The 600 is quicker off the mark, less laggy, but the brute force of the 65 get it eventually. From the lights definately the 600,
As said above I'd recommend a tune. I'm happy with my Speedriven tune
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG








