SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: 2013 SL63 vs 2013 M5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-10-2013, 12:26 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
JumpinJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL63
2013 SL63 vs 2013 M5

Managed to get both my SL63 and M5 to the track on the same day thanks to a friends help where we raced them head to head. The results were interesting. Though both completely different cars I don't think you could get a better matchup. Both cars are stock with ~1400 miles on them.

It was in the 90s with very high humidity. Short story is the M5 posted the best trap speed of the night at 118.45 with the SL not far behind at 118.21. The SL however got the lowest time with a 11.906 and the M5 hot on its heels at 11.933. Very interesting races.


Instead of reposting everything check this thread.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...-9-2013-a.html

Last edited by JumpinJim; 08-10-2013 at 12:30 PM.
Old 08-11-2013, 03:19 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
justthebest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
'09 SL Black, '12 ML63, '13 SL63, '14 E63 Wagon, '14 458 Italia
Doing a "Mexican" highway pull against a new M5 from ~40 was even until 120-ish. Dead even. So I think your results are kosher.
Old 08-11-2013, 11:55 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
mainly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Edmonton alberta, canada.
Posts: 921
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Porsche 991 GT3, 2012 cls63 Kleemann K3
cool.

i would have expected the sl to be a litte quicker, being 2-300 lbs lighter.

Last edited by mainly; 08-11-2013 at 11:59 PM.
Old 08-12-2013, 10:52 AM
  #4  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
JumpinJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL63
The M5 has more power to make up for its weight, 280 lbs heavier on the scale, and the excellent DCT transmission.

The SL has been quicker the week before. See my dragtimes link in sig. However it was silly hot in the 90s this time out and very humid so everything was running slower. The M5 would have been faster the other week too though, but I didn't take it as it wasn't broken in yet. Bottom line is they're very even.
Old 08-12-2013, 02:01 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
callmiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,515
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
2016 C63 S
Old 08-12-2013, 02:47 PM
  #6  
alx
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,268
Received 248 Likes on 214 Posts
sounds about right.
Old 08-12-2013, 07:23 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
fly2nite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Dallas
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'13 C63C
Originally Posted by JumpinJim
Managed to get both my SL63 and M5 to the track on the same day thanks to a friends help where we raced them head to head.
I don't often help others, but when I do, it's because someone needs a hand driving a supercar.
Old 08-14-2013, 11:29 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
The SL63 2013 responds fantastically to a re map. BHP up to 650 and you
really can feel much more go than stock. A very worthwhile upgrade.
Porsche turbo territory.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: 2013 SL63 vs 2013 M5



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 PM.