What tires for the track?
So, I want 18" tires with better traction than the OE setup. I have to be cautious since I have already lowered my car with Brabus springs. Anything too aggressive might rub. I don't want to spend a fortune. Here's some tires I've considered.
OE rears (for example) (prices primarily from tirerack)
Contisport 2 treadwear 280
245/35/18
width 9.64 diameter 24.75
Option 1 $225
Goodyear F1 gsd3 treadwear 280
255/35/18
width 10.2 diameter 25
Option 2 $180 treadwear 300
BF Goodrich KDW2
255/35/18
width 10.2 diameter 25
Option 3 $230 treadwear 240
Dunlop SP SportMaxx
255/35/18
width 10.2 diameter 25
Option 4 $178 treadwear 200
Falken Azeni RT615 (i hear these are great but sizing may be an issue)
245/40/18
width 9.64 diameter 25.7
Option 5 $165 treadwear 200
Falken Azeni RT615 (i hear these are great but sizing may be an issue)
235/40/18
width 9.25 diameter 25.4
Option 6 $171 treadwear
Toyo Proxes T1R
255/35/18
width 10.2 diameter 25
Any suggestions/recommendations?
Why not just use the stock Pirellis? They won't be any worse than those other tires listed. I did two lapping events with them and they were marginal.
I use Hoosiers for all my timed events. A Hoosier A6 or R6 245/35 is about as wide as a 275/30 street tire.
Falkens would be ideal but it looks probably like the Toyo's will get my vote. The PS2's would be next before the Pirelli's but I didn't want to pay the additional cost.
Tire sizes in 235/40/18 and 255/35/18 before tax, mount and balance
Toyo T1R $579
Mich PS2 $1038
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=1
They say the Toyos "never placed higher than eighth in any test, and in two dry tests, the autocross and the skidpad, the Toyo finished last, trailing the top finishers by significant margins. In some tests it felt better than it actually was performing, but overall, Geswein noted it was "soft and imprecise" and didn't "feel like a sport tire." "
I've run Bridgestone S0-3s for quite a while, but need to replace them. I've done quite a bit of research and have pretty much decided on BFGoodrich g-force T/A KDW-2 for track use and some street use at a reasonable price. (I will get 255/35x18 for the rear. I have another set of wheels and tires for street-only use.)
For ultimate traction in a DOT street tire if price is no concern, I'd go with Yoko ADVAN ADVAN Neova AD07, Bridgestone RE01R or BFG T/A KD, but you may not find these in the correct sizes. You might need to try 265/35WR18 in the rear and these are $100 a tire more than the KDW-2 BFGs and will not wear nearly as well.
Check the survey results at http://www.tirerack.com/tires/surveyresults/index.jsp
Hope this helps.
It's hard to get good feedback as generally people jump to R rated tyres way before they should. Pretty much everyone in the groups I run are on slicks. And I keep the same pace on these Yoko's and probably learning a lot more from the feedback.
One of my recent videos on track with these yoko's here
Last edited by Easty; Jul 11, 2006 at 12:11 PM.
BTW, Easty does note something interesting. I have not driven on R compounds but understand that it takes some getting use to. My understanding is that may not communicate they are losing traction like a street tire. Instead they are less progressive and you may find yourself in trouble rather quickly. Again, I haven't tried them yet, that's what I hear.
So, it's probably the KDW2 for dry performance, correct size, and value.
However, for the same price the new Potenza RE01R is better. The Advan Neova is better still but a bit more money.
The 265/35-18 should fit fine. I have winter tires that size that don't rub and my Hoosiers are wider than that in the rear.
Well, I'm glad I did! They make contact. Now, keep in mind I have Brabus lowering springs and OE 18" wheels for the track. These pics show 1) the car at level and 2) the car while going up my steep driveway. It makes contact. Yes, I know the track won't be the same but it may rub while taking a corner aggressively.
So, I'll stick with 255/35/18 for track use. I'll either get the RE-01 , KD, or KDW. Probably the latter to keep cost down. Just thought you should know.




So, I'll stick with 255/35/18 for track use. I'll either get the RE-01 , KD, or KDW. Probably the latter to keep cost down. Just thought you should know.
I've decided on the RE-01R myself rather than the KDW2s, certainly not because of traction (9.3 vs 9.5 for the RE-01R) or price ($50 less than the the RE-01R), but because of the many negative comments WRT the noise level of the KDW2s. Check the lowest survey ratings on the Tire Rack site -- some comments say they sound like tractor tires.
I may still try the 265/35s because I am not using them on the stock rims. I have the 22-spoke AMG rims (9.5 inch, rear) which have 33 mm vs 30 mm offset which should pull the tire inward a bit. (I think those are the correct numbers.)
Last edited by slk55er; Jul 14, 2006 at 06:35 PM. Reason: typo
Having seen these on several cars I can say the stick nearly as well as the DOT legal R-comp tires (aka Dunlop Super Sport Races, sport cups etc).
If you want to get a real race tire you should look at getting some Sport Cups as they are the only tire that will work in your sizes. Being that these wheels are for track use you really should go for a set or R-comp tires. They will hold up better and will not get over heated at the track after 1 session.
On a side note I would look into getting some VATH camber plates if you really plan on tracking the car. You will need more negative camber than the car currently has and VATH is the only company with plates for this application. The camber will allow you to get several days out of a set of tires. IF you really drive hard with no camber correction the tires will be gone in 1 day or less.
With these items you should have a blast.
What tracks do you frequent? If you ever come down to Willow Springs Or Cali Speedway let me know SMGC32 and I will come out for a day of tire destruction.
Last edited by CynCarvin32; Jul 14, 2006 at 06:52 PM.
I've decided on the RE-01R myself rather than the KDW2s, certainly not because of traction (9.3 vs 9.5 for the RE-01R) or price ($50 less than the the RE-01R), but because of the many negative comments WRT the noise level of the KDW2s. Check the lowest survey ratings on the Tire Rack site -- some comments say they sound like tractor tires.
I may still try the 265/35s because I am not using them on the stock rims. I have the 22-spoke AMG rims (9.5 inch, rear) which have 33 mm vs 30 mm offset which should pull the tire inward a bit. (I think those are the correct numbers.)
Your wheels might be okay with a 265/35. That offset difference may be just what you need to make it work. I would recommend trying some used 265's before you spend the money on RE01's. I'm sure you could find some with your profession.
CynCarvin32,
Do you know what issue of Grassroots they did the tire test? I'd like to read it. I now might just try 245/40 in the rear. That puts me in Azenis territory. I prefer the Azenis simply because of every comment I've heard was very positive.
235/40 in front with 245/40 in rear. Maybe as long as it doesn't rub.
Does anyone know whether or not a 3.74% difference in diameter would cause ESP errors?




On a side note I would look into getting some VATH camber plates if you really plan on tracking the car. You will need more negative camber than the car currently has and VATH is the only company with plates for this application.
I've run most of the major tracks in the US, had an SCCA Pro License, and am a certified instructor at the new Miller Motorsports Park (www.millermotorsportspark.com) near Salt Lake City, but most of my SLK track time has been at Spring Mt. in Pahrump, NV, Las Vegas Motorspeedway and the now defunct Pikes Peak International Raceway.
I plan to be at Miller again in Sept 23-24 with the BMW Club and Lapping Days (www.lappingdays.com)




Yoko ADVAN Sport
Bridgestone S-03 (which I've used and highly recommend)
Conti Sport Contact 2
Bridgestone RE05A RFT
Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3
Bridgestone RE040
Goodrich KDW2
Yoko AVS ES100
CynCarvin32,
Yeah, I wouldn't want to adjust camber. I got negative camber just by lowering the car. I had it aligned but I don't think they could adjust camber without a kit. However, the MB tech said it was still within spec so I left it alone.
slk55er,
What about running 235/40 in front? Would that help reduce understeer?




What about running 235/40 in front? Would that help reduce understeer?
The problem was not when turning or cornering hard, but when driving straight over large undulations which would cause the nose to dip. The 235/40 rubbed the inner wheel well lip so I rolled the edges. But the tires still rubbed a bit there and also on the sharp projection inside the front of the wheel well which attaches the front bumper to the body. Even bending that, the tires still rubbed, so I've relegated them to the rear on the stock rims for highway travel.
You can read more and see some photos at
http://www.benzworld.org/forums/r171...ires-55-a.html
and
http://www.benzworld.org/forums/r171...-22-spoke.html


