SLK55 (R171) 2004 - 2010: SLK200K, SLK280, SLK350, SLK55, SLK55 Black Series

Fuel Prices!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-08-2004, 11:09 AM
  #1  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
Marky-Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK55 AMG
Unhappy Fuel Prices!!!

Hi Folks!


I have an SLK55 on order, to be registered on 1st March 2005. My concern may be more relevant to anyone who has ordered an SLK55 in the UK but is anyone else very concerned about petrol prices in relation to this car? Would a fully-loaded SLK350 not make more sense in the current/future oil-price climate, especially when trying to sell the car on without a mega-depreciation in price... or am I just worrying for nothing and the higher cost of running the SLK55 will all be worth it???

Any comments or reassurance would be much appreciated.

Rgds


Marky-Mark
Old 06-08-2004, 11:52 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Depends what you are driving now....... I'm expecting the SLK55 to average no more than 20-22mpg which isn't much less than my S2000 which gets about 24mpg. So I'm not that bothered. I'd be surprised if the 350 averages much better than 28mpg so its not that different to the AMG.

AMG performance comes at a price!
Old 06-08-2004, 01:36 PM
  #3  
Newbie
 
DEETZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Porsche Cayenne S
20-22mpg is pretty good because I get 8mpg for city driving on my car and 17mpg for highway driving. I drive in city everyday which is bad.
Old 06-08-2004, 05:46 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
SL Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I average about 22 mpg in my SL55 so you should do slightly better in the SLK55.

Dont worry about fuel prices, just enjoy the car.
Old 06-08-2004, 05:53 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dinko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55
I'm expecting the SLK55 to get better milage than our SL55... maybe about 25 mpg?

But here in the states I'm not even concerned about gas prices as I would be if I was living in the UK.
Old 06-09-2004, 02:36 AM
  #6  
Newbie
 
MartinH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Audi RS4
I currently average 13.4 litres per 100 km in my RS4 which includes a lot of high speed driving (autobahn) and the problem is not the fuel consumption but the size of the tank! In the RS I have to fill up every 350 km or so. I'm expecting the same from the SLK maybe slightly less.

If you are worried about the running costs and depreciation then it probably isn't the right car for you - it certainly won't be the cheap alternative. My own opinion is that it will not be much less economical than the 350 and the additional rareity value should keep resale prices high.

I suspect if you bought the 350 you would always be hankering after a 55!

Go for the 55 - life's too short not to!
Old 06-09-2004, 12:37 PM
  #7  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
Marky-Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK55 AMG
Thanks Martin... that was just the kind of reply I was looking for! I'll stick with my 55 order!

Regards


Mark
Old 06-09-2004, 12:46 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dinko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55
Originally posted by MartinH
I currently average 13.4 litres per 100 km in my RS4 which includes a lot of high speed driving (autobahn) and the problem is not the fuel consumption but the size of the tank! In the RS I have to fill up every 350 km or so. I'm expecting the same from the SLK maybe slightly less.

If you are worried about the running costs and depreciation then it probably isn't the right car for you - it certainly won't be the cheap alternative. My own opinion is that it will not be much less economical than the 350 and the additional rareity value should keep resale prices high.

I suspect if you bought the 350 you would always be hankering after a 55!

Go for the 55 - life's too short not to!
Well said.
Old 06-12-2004, 04:29 PM
  #9  
Super Member
 
MadC32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C 32 AMG (203.065)
Originally posted by MartinH

Go for the 55 - life's too short not to!
Good one..
Old 06-15-2004, 03:04 AM
  #10  
I1 ULOOZ
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by MadC32
Good one..
exactly

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Fuel Prices!!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:27 AM.