What did you do to your E55 today?
A previous owner had installed H&R lowering springs on the stock #3 pads all around, so it had the reverse rake issue. It also still had the stock bilstein shocks... Replaced the front spring pads with #2 and left the #3 in the rear. It didn't help as much as I wanted.
I ordered the shocks from AJUSA, which was the cheapest I found. The part numbers are labeled as front and rear but they are actually reversed, which I had read somewhere as well.
End Result:
In the process of getting it all installed. Usually I have access to a lift, but this time I decided to do it on the ground. I'm spoiled, I want to use the lift again.
Had to wear my E55 shirt (I make these) for good luck.
The car needs a wash now, and I need to order the Continental DWS 06 front tires to replace the older dunlops that are on there now. The continentals fill the wheel wells nicely and I don't even really need spacers.
My understanding having read most all the old posts I could find on the shocks' issue....e.g....."front PN's in back and back PN's in front" is that it was remedied some time ago.
The part numbers are now correct and the shocks go in their intended position because the valving is different for the front shocks.
See link..: https://mbworld.org/forums/w210-amg/...ggestions.html
I'm still curious about this as I'm getting ready to do the exact same thing...H&R Springs with the B8 Shocks. I have stock #3 pads all the way around and have been stressing about what pad numbers to run as I will be paying a indy to do the work while replacing other front and rear suspension components and I really don't want to have to pay over and over to get the correct set-up.
Did you try installing the shocks as labeled for front and rear?
My understanding having read most all the old posts I could find on the shocks' issue....e.g....."front PN's in back and back PN's in front" is that it was remedied some time ago.
The part numbers are now correct and the shocks go in their intended position because the valving is different for the front shocks.
See link..: https://mbworld.org/forums/w210-amg/...ggestions.html
I'm still curious about this as I'm getting ready to do the exact same thing...H&R Springs with the B8 Shocks. I have stock #3 pads all the way around and have been stressing about what pad numbers to run as I will be paying a indy to do the work while replacing other front and rear suspension components and I really don't want to have to pay over and over to get the correct set-up.
Did you try installing the shocks as labeled for front and rear?
front: BIL-24-062046
rear: BIL-24-062053
but when I went to go install the front shocks, the shock was noticeably shorter than the stock bilstein. So I thought about comparing it to the stock rear shock, and it matched. So the new rear b8 matched the front shock height and the new front b8 matched the rear. First I installed the shorter shock up front because that was what the part number was for... but when I got to the rear it was very clear that it was going to be too tall.
so, I just ended up swapping the front and rear and the height matched and bolted down as it should have. I drove it around the block a little bit to level it out and listen for noises, and I didn’t feel anything abnormal. It is a little frustrating to do the whole job and wonder if it’s not correct. Swapping it is easy but time consuming.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I appreciate your info....it's very helpful. Having not actually seen the shocks compared yet definitely puts me at a deficit for correct knowledge but if the front and rear shocks are that much different in length...something must be up.
So to confirm....The B8 Shock labeled as rear was clearly too long? They would not install?
Being that the B8 shocks matching those part numbers are supposed to be shorter in length than the stock shocks as they're for lowered cars it would make sense their shorter all around but if it's that obvious on the rear than maybe the mislabeling is true.
I'll definitely be ordering new #1 Front and #2 Rear pads.
I appreciate your info....it's very helpful. Having not actually seen the shocks compared yet definitely puts me at a deficit for correct knowledge but if the front and rear shocks are that much different in length...something must be up.
So to confirm....The B8 Shock labeled as rear was clearly too long? They would not install?
Being that the B8 shocks matching those part numbers are supposed to be shorter in length than the stock shocks as they're for lowered cars it would make sense their shorter all around but if it's that obvious on the rear than maybe the mislabeling is true.
I'll definitely be ordering new #1 Front and #2 Rear pads.
I noticed the issue in the rear with the longer shock, it just didn’t seem like it was meant to go in there. Even when I pulled the control arm down it wasn’t close.
Just to confirm as I forgot to ask...You're using the H&R Spring Set PN #52724 with the writing on the spring coils right side up?
Thanks...!
I might be able to squeeze 5mm spacers under there all said and done, but I want to correct the negative camber as much as I can to save my new tires.
thanks! I love my tectite. It has a pampered life lol
http://www.hrsprings.com/application...s/25/454/2001/
I do remember reading several posts about people getting those instead of the PN I listed and because of the spring rate differences in the front springs, it caused varied spring pad assortments to get the desired height.
I purchased this spring kit...:
http://www.hrsprings.com/application...s/25/457/2001/
I have a feeling I may be back where I started with trying to determine which front and rear pads to use....

I don’t want to cut any coils as I believe the H&R springs are progressive rate.
I’ll be running a 245/35-19 front and a 275/30-19 rear.
Next mod... Hm either a aftermarket seat or race kats inplace of the primaries... Maybe I should fix the AC as well now when summer is fast approaching.
Next mod... Hm either a aftermarket seat or race kats inplace of the primaries... Maybe I should fix the AC as well now when summer is fast approaching.
Next mod... Hm either a aftermarket seat or race kats inplace of the primaries... Maybe I should fix the AC as well now when summer is fast approaching.
The stock primaries have to be like 5-600 cell and they almost hug the header.Many advertised race kats are 100 cell but that's not going to cut it for this engine displacement. Fearing failed emissions testing really is not worth it like you say! The secondaries had at least twice the cell count compared to 200 cell magnaflows so imagine what the primaries would be
The stock primaries have to be like 5-600 cell and they almost hug the header.Many advertised race kats are 100 cell but that's not going to cut it for this engine displacement. Fearing failed emissions testing really is not worth it like you say! The secondaries had at least twice the cell count compared to 200 cell magnaflows so imagine what the primaries would be
The stock primaries have to be like 5-600 cell and they almost hug the header.








