Dyno results w211 K1
03-09-2006, 06:15 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Dyno results w211 K1
Well here are the results after Kleemann K1 with Trick 101. Today's conditions were perfect! To say the least I am impressed. These are not corrected, they are rwhp and rwtq!
Last edited by grussell; 09-27-2006 at 11:23 PM.
03-09-2006, 06:26 PM
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
i have seen many k2 and its rare just to see a k1 and pull some decent runs.
sell me your car in about 2 years? j/k
I wish I could find a used 2004/05 silver, low miles, extended warranty with a Stage 1 set up... here in So Cal.... does anybody have this set up and selling their car?
Try to find a new M5 and go at from a roll, and see how you do.
We have yet to find a match up of a Stage1 or 2 55k motor vs a new M5.
one more question> Where did you get your stage 1 set up?
sell me your car in about 2 years? j/k
I wish I could find a used 2004/05 silver, low miles, extended warranty with a Stage 1 set up... here in So Cal.... does anybody have this set up and selling their car?
Try to find a new M5 and go at from a roll, and see how you do.
We have yet to find a match up of a Stage1 or 2 55k motor vs a new M5.
one more question> Where did you get your stage 1 set up?
03-09-2006, 06:31 PM
#4
Member
Nice numbers. I'd like to get my car on the dyno to get some baseline numbers before I do the K1 with I/C pump. How much did it cost if you dont mind telling? Also what gas were you using?
Trending Topics
03-09-2006, 06:56 PM
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sin City
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
12' C63 P31, 06' Supercharged Range, 08' BMW 550i
just to clarify --- that is converted crank hp and not rwhp, correct?
Last edited by dragonAMG; 03-09-2006 at 07:05 PM.
03-09-2006, 07:12 PM
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by dragonAMG
just to clarify --- that is converted crank hp and not rwhp, correct?
03-09-2006, 07:17 PM
#13
Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Sauceboy01
that's a good camera phone...
my camera phone takes pics to.. but they look as foggy as a mirror after a shower!
my camera phone takes pics to.. but they look as foggy as a mirror after a shower!
03-09-2006, 08:34 PM
#15
Member
Thread Starter
I know, I couln't believe it either.
After the first run, I said that's at the crank, right? He said no. I said well your dyno is broken! He said no, that's at the wheels and it's correct. OK, we do it again and it get's higher! We ran it with ESP off in 4th gear to 179mph, I thought it was going to blow up! Go figure! I guess I need to go to the track!
After the first run, I said that's at the crank, right? He said no. I said well your dyno is broken! He said no, that's at the wheels and it's correct. OK, we do it again and it get's higher! We ran it with ESP off in 4th gear to 179mph, I thought it was going to blow up! Go figure! I guess I need to go to the track!
03-09-2006, 08:37 PM
#16
Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by e55 baller
Dood. Please get an ET. If you run 124-126 mph in the 1/4 then your dyno is correct and its rear wheel. I have K2+ and my dyno is 485/558 at the wheels.
464rwhp and 535rwtq
03-09-2006, 08:52 PM
#17
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NorCal - SF
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercedes-Benz
Originally Posted by grussell
I know, I couln't believe it either.
After the first run, I said that's at the crank, right? He said no. I said well your dyno is broken! He said no, that's at the wheels and it's correct. OK, we do it again and it get's higher! We ran it with ESP off in 4th gear to 179mph, I thought it was going to blow up! Go figure! I guess I need to go to the track!
After the first run, I said that's at the crank, right? He said no. I said well your dyno is broken! He said no, that's at the wheels and it's correct. OK, we do it again and it get's higher! We ran it with ESP off in 4th gear to 179mph, I thought it was going to blow up! Go figure! I guess I need to go to the track!
03-09-2006, 09:24 PM
#18
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Brentwood, CA
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05 sl600, 06 CLS55 AMG, 1971 Cuda
Originally Posted by grussell
I know, I couln't believe it either.
After the first run, I said that's at the crank, right? He said no. I said well your dyno is broken! He said no, that's at the wheels and it's correct. OK, we do it again and it get's higher! We ran it with ESP off in 4th gear to 179mph, I thought it was going to blow up! Go figure! I guess I need to go to the track!
After the first run, I said that's at the crank, right? He said no. I said well your dyno is broken! He said no, that's at the wheels and it's correct. OK, we do it again and it get's higher! We ran it with ESP off in 4th gear to 179mph, I thought it was going to blow up! Go figure! I guess I need to go to the track!
Last edited by SLVRBLT43K; 03-09-2006 at 10:14 PM.
03-09-2006, 10:04 PM
#20
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04 E 500 4matic wagon; CLS 63 AMG
Hmm, I have a cls 55 with Kleeman k1 mods. The before and after rw dynos were:
402.31 hp before; 429.5 hp after
431.53 tq before; 483.92 tq after
402.31 hp before; 429.5 hp after
431.53 tq before; 483.92 tq after
03-09-2006, 10:09 PM
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SFV, Ca.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W210, W220, W163, W164, C6
Impressive results!! Did you also run a 1/4 mile on their dyno? Los Angeles Performance Division (LAPD) is up the street and has a 2/4 wheel dyno in case you want to do a comparision.
03-09-2006, 10:49 PM
#24
Member
Thread Starter
