Saw the E63 at N.Y show today...
ML 63 looked great also, had a CLS 63 their that looked good. Anyway it was a good show, definitely better than last years...just disappointed with the new E63.
ML 63 looked great also, had a CLS 63 their that looked good. Anyway it was a good show, definitely better than last years...just disappointed with the new E63.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Did you see how the mirrors are put on the doors? looks odd
doesn't it?
somehow they look so dopey, and the front is too pointy IMO.. maybe im just too used to what our E55 looks like
somehow they look so dopey, and the front is too pointy IMO.. maybe im just too used to what our E55 looks like

Is this because of the compliance to the new pedestrian impact standard to decrease the point of impact on the pedestrian?

Is this because of the compliance to the new pedestrian impact standard to decrease the point of impact on the pedestrian?
ahh damn front licence plates.. have no fear, MB will always find a way to make the front end of their cars to look ugly (w/ the front plate)
Wait for the tests to come in, it will eat the E55 for lunch.
You people are in denial, you dont want to admit that you like it just coz it has 50 ft of trq less and no tuning potential lol
But on the other hand this engne was build by AMG! Not tuned! Its somthing special!!!
YEah so when will it appear in the magazine already!!!
Yes, I'm sure the 6.3 will be a strong engine but I'm confident it's not going to "eat" the 55 for lunch (at least not in a straight line). As far as going up against a tuned 55....................I think I know where I'll put my money.




Overall, I like all the new enhancements of the E63, with the exception of the black gauges. The white gauges on the e55 are so much more attractive and involving.
Overall, I like all the new enhancements of the E63, with the exception of the black gauges. The white gauges on the e55 are so much more attractive and involving.
Come on man do you really think AMG would release a newer car that is slower then the old one? Come on.
i think it will be a bit faster before 100 mph like maybe .5 seconds, 2-2.5 seconds faster up to 150 due the gearing, and it will be a way better handler due to lighter engine and better chassis and suspension.
P.s going to my delaer now ask him few question!
I cant wait to hear that!
i think it will be a bit faster before 100 mph like maybe .5 seconds, 2-2.5 seconds faster up to 150 due the gearing, and it will be a way better handler due to lighter engine and better chassis and suspension.
P.s going to my delaer now ask him few question!

Even if it is a tad bit faster, I honestly could car less. My E55K2 is putting down nearly 600hp and close to 650 ft. lbs.
BOB-- when are you going to buy a car? You've been talking about it forever.
Last edited by dragonAMG; Apr 17, 2006 at 01:23 PM.
Well I`m talking about stock models. I also don`t believe the E63 will have the off the line traction problems that the E55 does. Opon opon throttle the E55 releases most of it`s monster torque very earily in the REV band. When speeds reach 135-140mph the torque dies off.The E63 will beat it not only from the start but at higher speeds like 140mph! The G7 transmission makes much better use of the torque band than the 5-speed used in the E55 and is more efficient with less torque gaps than the 5-speed. This is one of the reasons it will beat the M5 at higher speeds. The torque in the E63 is released at a higher rpm and is better managed.
I have seen a video of a rolling start race where a new M5 was like 24 car lengths ahead of the E55 when speeds reach 140mph. Thats proof that most of the 516lb-ft of torque is released too earily in the REV band!
This won`t happen with the E63.
E55 AMG 516lb-ft @2650rpm. too much torque too early, smoking tires.
E63 AMG 465lb-ft @5200rpm. smoother off the line starts, improved times.





