E63 Performance uncertainty!
Another magazine, one I do remember, is the official Mercedes-Benz Enthusiast magazine-- they reviewed the E63 and commented much the same: Bottom line, it's faster. They stated the old E55 blasted to 60 in a rather lame--tame rather, 4.7 seconds (
slow car, I dont see what all the fuss is about!), whilst the new E63 accomplished the same deed in a faster yet still unimpressive 4.5 seconds. A bit off topic, I find it a tad bit sad a Pontiac GTO bone stock can crush an E55 and keep up with an E63. I lost much respect for the E-class, AMG in general after reading that. Wether I believe it or not is irrelevant, I'm just stating what I've read.
Anyways, yeah... go E-Class...
Wether I believe it or not is irrelevant, I'm just stating what I've read.
Anyways, yeah... go E-Class...

There are magazines placing the GTO at 4.7 to 60 and the E55 at 4.7-- some even at 4.8! If his fastest pass stock was 13.6, he probably had no idea how to shift, no pun intended.
What are you smoking man? GTO's are NOT that quick stock, geared way too long and have slushy suspensions that need to be done away with. Mid to high 13's maybe.
And the article reviewing the M5, S6 and e63 was heavily biased against the M5's SMG tranny. They HATED it and loved the 63's new gearbox. I personally adore my SMG, but that's after driving it for weeks. I'm interested to see how the 63 handles compared to the 55 though, is it really going to be that much of a difference (hope so)?

The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The car is an automatic.
Exodus just go to www.dragtimes.com and do a search for pontiac gto , click on the 1/4 mile number and look for a bone stock time.
Exodus just go to www.dragtimes.com and do a search for pontiac gto , click on the 1/4 mile number and look for a bone stock time.
Look at these rims, the rear lip...THE FRONT AIR DAM!!!








