Okay, who's up for an engine swap?
If it's rated at 550HP/664 ft-lb TQ - it's from the Maybach, not the Sl65/S65/CL65.
Heh, starting point for your own E V12?
Last edited by Beowulf; Sep 19, 2006 at 08:49 PM.
If it's rated at 550HP/664 ft-lb TQ - it's from the Maybach, not the Sl65/S65/CL65.
Heh, starting point for your own E V12?
Ted

But that's just me.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I've been toying with the idea of a rear-mounted turbo system (maybe STS) on a 210 E55.




The 600 engine is an ECU tune away from 600+ hp. You could get silly on the 600 by adding new turbos and probably bump it up to 800+ hp but I'm not sure how the engine would cope. You would, without a doubt, have to use an electronic wastegate so you could limit the low end torque to an acceptible level so you don't blow the tranny.
I understand about the low end power. Main thing I should have said is the power band will be shifted. You wont have the monster tq at the blip of the throttle.
I was comparing a 55k engine to a 55TT swap not the MB 600 engine
I think the Tranny limit is higher than that also?
Thought I saw some 800ftlbs.




I understand about the low end power. Main thing I should have said is the power band will be shifted. You wont have the monster tq at the blip of the throttle.
I was comparing a 55k engine to a 55TT swap not the MB 600 engine
The guy that did my dyno was really into the torque curve, even though of course it was messed up, you still could see it SPIKE at super low RPM.
LOL I know the benefits of a TT. I am just saying the power band will be shifted a bitThe displacement of the V8s helps a hole bunch.
What I am really getting at is bigger turbos than what the current 600 has. On a 55k engine.
We are on the same page
How about twincharge?! Turbo + supercharger. It could be done.
Look at the new TT 335i - max torque as soon as 1500 rpm. The smaller turbos needed to achieve that torque profile need to be small enough to spool at just off-idle.
A turbo setup for a 55 motor needen't be quite so conervative due to the larger amout of exhaust gas and existing NA torque.
So who's doing the bloody swap already?
Last edited by ChicagoX; Sep 20, 2006 at 06:12 PM.



