RennTech stage 1 in San Diego??
HEHE!! I will be doing both, so I don't really care which is better. I am curious, however, on what gains can be had on exhaust. I don't just want more sound. I want more POWER. Especially low end, and I wonder how to get that.
Sleep tight.
I'm assuming you are doing pre/post dynos, so do share!!
Either way, as long as you are stoked. Life is relative for us all. Very nice setup.
Looks like we will have some slap happy folks on this forum in the next few weeks!!
OK I'll bite
you went from 416-453 HP, 445-492 ft-lb torque
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/166604-e55-dyno-today-renntech-1-install.html

tell u again how that translates to 557 HP, 605 ft-lb at the crank???
you went from 416-453 HP, 445-492 ft-lb torque
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=166604
tell u again how that translates to 557 HP, 605 ft-lb at the crank???
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
renn suggests using 1.23 (23% drive train loss) for conversion from rwh/rwt to crank. their suggest as is stated on RENN website for stage pckgs for 55 & corresponding expected gains. my numbers slightly bettrr versus RENN claims esp based on fact that they posted numbers/graphs using 93 octane versus my CA 91 ocatne. Adam?
RENN site:
Dyno Notes:
Performance Package 1
Performance Package 2
Performance Package 3
Performance Package 4
Performance Package 5
Performance Package 6
All graphs show wheel horsepower and torque. To find crank horsepower and torque, multiply value by 1.23. This accounts for drivetrain losses.
Engine power output depends on many variable and thus values vary from car to car. Ambient temperature, altitude, engine mileage, as well as other factors can all have significant effects on engine output and dyno readings.
Last edited by m52e55; Jan 19, 2007 at 08:59 PM.



