MY latest DYNO RESULTS !!!
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 1
From: Moscow, Russia
E55K
MY latest DYNO RESULTS !!!
Hello guys...finally I have done some DYNO runs this weekends...
Weather in the Dynoshop was +16C...
Dyno - latest DynoDynamic machine...
My mods: Kleemann Style Headers, Primary Cats removed, E. Race mufflers and ASP pullies + custom ECU adjusted to those mods...
All graphs showing CRANK HP !!!
We couldnt do the FULL speed pull on 4 gear, cause DYNO machine would let US...its porgrammed for max speed of 125 mph...so it would only let us go up to 4600 RPMs...
Can someone tell ME what would happand nex if we got to FULL SPEED at 4th ???
Other graphs shows the FULL RUN run on 3rd gear...and we got the whole graph...
Please let ME know you comments guys...and I would apriaciate if some one who know this staff could recalculate this to USA measures and tell what they think about the GRAPHS...
Is everything OK with my ECU and anything I need to change ???
I also have all lambda ratio printed at each RPMS...
Thanks
Weather in the Dynoshop was +16C...
Dyno - latest DynoDynamic machine...
My mods: Kleemann Style Headers, Primary Cats removed, E. Race mufflers and ASP pullies + custom ECU adjusted to those mods...
All graphs showing CRANK HP !!!
We couldnt do the FULL speed pull on 4 gear, cause DYNO machine would let US...its porgrammed for max speed of 125 mph...so it would only let us go up to 4600 RPMs...
Can someone tell ME what would happand nex if we got to FULL SPEED at 4th ???
Other graphs shows the FULL RUN run on 3rd gear...and we got the whole graph...
Please let ME know you comments guys...and I would apriaciate if some one who know this staff could recalculate this to USA measures and tell what they think about the GRAPHS...
Is everything OK with my ECU and anything I need to change ???
I also have all lambda ratio printed at each RPMS...
Thanks
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 1
From: Moscow, Russia
E55K
I know if you divide by 1.36 we get numbers in KW...around 457kw
There must be someone here who knows how to transfer those measures...
and other question if on 4th gear we get TOP POWER around 620HP at 4600..Whould this number be higher at higher RPMs like 6800 ???
There must be someone here who knows how to transfer those measures...
and other question if on 4th gear we get TOP POWER around 620HP at 4600..Whould this number be higher at higher RPMs like 6800 ???
Last edited by E55 RUSS; Apr 9, 2007 at 11:33 AM.
Super Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 953
Likes: 2
2004 E55
Congrats. A full pull in 4th would be great to see.
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
From: In a box
W211 E55
The second graph shows your HP peaking at about 6200 RPM. Definitely breathing well !
I would be very interested in seeing the Lambda (A/F)
I would be very interested in seeing the Lambda (A/F)
Last edited by ChicagoX; Apr 9, 2007 at 04:37 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 77
From: Wash. D.C.
'20 S63
Trending Topics
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 77
From: Wash. D.C.
'20 S63
Super Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 953
Likes: 2
2004 E55
E55 RUSS said the numbers were crank hp. rwhp would be crank minus drive train loss. 23% loss is too high. Kleemann says there is about 19% loss, others on this board feel it is 15%. That's why I gave those figures. I agree a dyno should show rwhp, not crank, unless it did a calculation itself to convert rwhp to bhp.
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
I hate to say this. But the fact that these # are at the crank they are pretty much useless to most people who knows anything about dyno. Whoever converts rwhp # to crank hp only have one thing in mind, try to show more HP than the car really have. There is just no accurate way to convert RWHP to crank HP, period. This is the same thing as people who run the 1/4 mile above sea level and try to give you the corrected to sea level time. If your car didn't actually do it it did not happen. It's as simple as that. Next time you dyno your car ask for the real dyno sheet with actual RWHP. Then we would all know how much more power you car actually make.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 1
From: Moscow, Russia
E55K
Well...As I been told the Dyno calculates all the numbers inlcuding transmission loss by it self, there is all the data about 211 e55, we select E55 and then do a pull...
Why they have crank HP is because most of the people here want to see crank HP, thats why they have this software...
On the Dyno there is program that you can use and then it shows you wheel HP...but they are telling ME that its easy just to recalculate to KW and then to torgues at the wheels...
I will copy and paste Lambda numbers later...
Where are our experts
who can solve and expain this issue...
Anyone from AUS who know staff about DynoDynamic machines can chime inn ???
Why they have crank HP is because most of the people here want to see crank HP, thats why they have this software...
On the Dyno there is program that you can use and then it shows you wheel HP...but they are telling ME that its easy just to recalculate to KW and then to torgues at the wheels...
I will copy and paste Lambda numbers later...
Where are our experts
who can solve and expain this issue...Anyone from AUS who know staff about DynoDynamic machines can chime inn ???
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,174
Likes: 19
From: London, UK
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, GLE 400d, R107 280SL, Golf Polo
The only way to know if your tune is right is to see A/F ratios ....
The chart in 3rd gear willl add further uncertainty as the conversion will be off ... the dyno will compensate for it - but 4th gear runs are the most usefull.... wierd why dyno wont go >125mph tho.
So looks healthy - but not sure how healthy ...
The chart in 3rd gear willl add further uncertainty as the conversion will be off ... the dyno will compensate for it - but 4th gear runs are the most usefull.... wierd why dyno wont go >125mph tho.
So looks healthy - but not sure how healthy ...
Super Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 953
Likes: 2
2004 E55
My car with K2 has been run on a Dyno Dynamics and showed a rwhp of only 425, and yes, the car had to be pulled in 3rd gear. It did not convert to crank hp. I never really felt the machine did it justice. I'm going to get a DynoJet done. The A/F was about 10.8 to 1
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 1
From: Moscow, Russia
E55K
Spoked to Dyno Shop today..they spoked with DynoDynamics...they said there some kind of Cams need to bechanged for the machine to be runned over 125mph...4 of them need to be changed and cost of each is 4800 USD...
They will chnged it once the current ones are go bad...
They said they had the latest software and dyno caluculates the grpah n futher even we could reach onle 205 kms..
I have A/F ratios..will post them when I have some spare time... If I remeber they are something like 10.0 to 1 or 10.4 to 1...
They will chnged it once the current ones are go bad...
They said they had the latest software and dyno caluculates the grpah n futher even we could reach onle 205 kms..
I have A/F ratios..will post them when I have some spare time... If I remeber they are something like 10.0 to 1 or 10.4 to 1...
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
From: .
.
I hate to say this. But the fact that these # are at the crank they are pretty much useless to most people who knows anything about dyno. Whoever converts rwhp # to crank hp only have one thing in mind, try to show more HP than the car really have. There is just no accurate way to convert RWHP to crank HP, period. This is the same thing as people who run the 1/4 mile above sea level and try to give you the corrected to sea level time. If your car didn't actually do it it did not happen. It's as simple as that. Next time you dyno your car ask for the real dyno sheet with actual RWHP. Then we would all know how much more power you car actually make.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,174
Likes: 19
From: London, UK
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, GLE 400d, R107 280SL, Golf Polo
Trap speed is the best and easiest way using ...
Either ...
HP = mass(pounds) x (velocity(mph)/234)^3
kW = mass(kg) x (velocity(km/h)/319)^3
Also you get more real life test in that cooling systems are running as per design and not having the motor run static and heat soaking.
Either ...
HP = mass(pounds) x (velocity(mph)/234)^3
kW = mass(kg) x (velocity(km/h)/319)^3
Also you get more real life test in that cooling systems are running as per design and not having the motor run static and heat soaking.
