W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63

63 all models BEST 1/4, 1/8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:10 AM
  #626  
Fr33kn63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
E63 AMG
Originally Posted by MHP
Sorry Jim but that proecdure is 100% flawed and will yield only skewed numbers. Anyone that's been tuned by us or even other tuners such as Renntech (aka rarfinancial) will tell you the tune isn't optimal for 200 miles. The first 30-40 being especially critical to how quickly the units learn--if not beat upon in manual mode it will take longer than 200 miles.
+1
I am going to have to agree with you on this one. All tunes I have ever had have some minor initial impact, but have always had to put a couple hundred miles on a tune to realize its maximum potential.
You would really want to test this on separate days to get those additional miles.
Since you probably already know how your car has been running off your original ECU you should just go ahead and put the new one in and break it in. See if your times at the next track event break your best times from before and by how much. Just an idea IMO.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 10:13 AM
  #627  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by JT55
I been quiet here awhile but im going to officially say im good for at least an 11.2 when i come out again in say MArch - April.
I had the 11.4 on my 9th run in a row!
only stopping to swap tires - first time to the drag strip in 15 yrs and a slammed suspension and 1100 miles on the motor.

I'll have the proper tires a better ride height and a more broken in motor.
and maybe some more tricks up my sleeve.

But it will prob. be moot by then Jim will prob. be running 9's by March.

I def. left some on the table.
John, your car is FAST! I was super impressed at MIR. Why don't you head down to Houston on Jan 24th for the track day I set up? Winter has set in in Chicago as I'm sure it has in your neck of the woods as well and I can't wait until spring to go 10's so I rented the track. I'm thinking about going road racing the following day, that would be two great days of racing and I'm sure we could find some time Saturday night to hit a club or something.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #628  
MHP's Avatar
MHP
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
'09 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by jrcart
John, your car is FAST! I was super impressed at MIR. Why don't you head down to Houston on Jan 24th for the track day I set up? Winter has set in in Chicago as I'm sure it has in your neck of the woods as well and I can't wait until spring to go 10's so I rented the track. I'm thinking about going road racing the following day, that would be two great days of racing and I'm sure we could find some time Saturday night to hit a club or something.
For me it would be 1 great day of racing and 1 day of rolling my car over in turns trying to keep up with you 2.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #629  
MACHC5's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: Central New Jersey
CLK63 Black, E350 Wagon, Supercharged Denali, Lotus Elise, Tesla Model 3 Dual-Motor.
Originally Posted by MHP
Sorry Jim but that proecdure is 100% flawed and will yield only skewed numbers. Anyone that's been tuned by us or even other tuners such as Renntech (aka rarfinancial) will tell you the tune isn't optimal for 200 miles. The first 30-40 being especially critical to how quickly the units learn--if not beat upon in manual mode it will take longer than 200 miles.

I agree with Mo in that taking the average of a number of runs with both ECUs (fully learned) on different nights is the best overall way to test tune A v tune B.





Again I applaud your enthusiasim but the results will be anything but concrete if the above method is used.
To Everyone following this thread,

I have chosen to maintain a neutral "Higher Ground" No Opinion, here on the Forum, until the ECU testing is completed.
And add to that fact, I'm also one of the most consistent ET drivers you'll ever meet on a drag strip will only add to the real numbers achieved.

But to say SORRY.., and start casting doubt on "Back to Back" ECU testing before learning of the results, says volumes to many on the Forum.

Andy, The testing may show great results for the MHP ECU tune...

So until then, let's stop all the Bench Racing and posturing on one side or the other until we all know what the results are...

Jim
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:41 PM
  #630  
Fr33kn63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
E63 AMG
Originally Posted by MACHC5
To Everyone following this thread,

I have chosen to maintain a neutral "Higher Ground" No Opinion, here on the Forum, until the ECU testing is completed.
And add to that fact, I'm also one of the most consistent ET drivers you'll ever meet on a drag strip will only add to the real numbers achieved.

But to say SORRY.., and start casting doubt on "Back to Back" ECU testing before learning of the results, says volumes to many on the Forum.

Andy, The testing may show great results for the MHP ECU tune...

So until then, let's stop all the Bench Racing and posturing on one side or the other until we all know what the results are...

Jim
Its regardless to whatever tune your testing your results will be skewed because neither or one will be broken in while the other isnt. But if you want to call that accurate testing, be my guest...
GL with your findings....
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #631  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by MACHC5
To Everyone following this thread,

I have chosen to maintain a neutral "Higher Ground" No Opinion, here on the Forum, until the ECU testing is completed.
And add to that fact, I'm also one of the most consistent ET drivers you'll ever meet on a drag strip will only add to the real numbers achieved.

But to say SORRY.., and start casting doubt on "Back to Back" ECU testing before learning of the results, says volumes to many on the Forum.

Andy, The testing may show great results for the MHP ECU tune...

So until then, let's stop all the Bench Racing and posturing on one side or the other until we all know what the results are...

Jim
I think what you are planning on doing is awesome, although slightly flawwed it should still show some pretty solid and convincing results one way or the other. There is no sure fire way of doing this that will be 100% accurate, this should be the most accurate attempt to date for a comparison like this. Let's be realistic, to get a good sampling of results we would need 3-4 cars running MHP tunes and 3-4 other cars (same make, model and mods) to be running in the same conditions on the same day with only 1 guy doing the driving. The fact that that will probably never be possible leaves us with what you are doing
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #632  
MHP's Avatar
MHP
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
'09 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by MACHC5
To Everyone following this thread,

I have chosen to maintain a neutral "Higher Ground" No Opinion, here on the Forum, until the ECU testing is completed.
And add to that fact, I'm also one of the most consistent ET drivers you'll ever meet on a drag strip will only add to the real numbers achieved.


Jim, in all honesty, records are not set by making 33 passes in one day. That may be how you drive your car but you're leaving .2 and 1.5-2mph in it by not letting it cool off. When ECTs go over 190F the ECU starts pulling timing, both stock and with our tuning, except with our tuning, more timing gets pulled since there's more base/advance in there anyway.

But to say SORRY.., and start casting doubt on "Back to Back" ECU testing before learning of the results, says volumes to many on the Forum.
Yes it does. It says that I know what I'm talking about and others with our tune will tell you the same. In theory what you're trying to do is admirable, in reality it's a flawed test, end of story. Don't take my word for it, ask others and they will tell you the same.
I preach the same to all our customers including you many times, 30-40 hard miles in manual then the rest (up to 200 total) hard in sport. Do not test until then.
You simply can't swap ECUs at the track and see the true potential of either, again it's just a fact that cannot be denied.

Andy, The testing may show great results for the MHP ECU tune...
Jim, your testing has already shown great results for our tune. You went from making a single 11.95@116 pass with 12.0-12.1s@114-115 back-ups in significantly better DA to running a string of 11.7s@120+ despite adding Nitto DRs (35psi?) which helped your 60' but hurt trap vs the stock tires.
This much rings true doing both the uncorrected and corrected math.
You ran at ATCO with N/A cars that also ran at MIR and were running .2 and 1-2mph slower than they had the week earlier in MD. Meaning you're within a tenth of a second and less than 1mph than the two quickest/fastest CLK 63 BSs with your mods plus a complete longtube to tailipe full exhaust, and they made less than 10 passes at the entire event... What exactly were you expecting?

So until then, let's stop all the Bench Racing and posturing on one side or the other until we all know what the results are...

Jim
I hate to break this to you, but results have been and will continue to come in regardless of whether or not you attempt to complete the flawed test above. I don't mean this in a disrespectful manner but you posting said results would just result in more misinformation on this site, which we definitely don't need.
Nevertheless, do what you want.

At this point I'd like to offer you a refund in exchange for us taking you back to stock, you obviously aren't happy with your ECU/TCU gains, as such you can always run stock again or maybe try a PC tune? We have all the objective and accurate CLK BS 63 data we need at this point.


Thanks

Last edited by MHP; Dec 9, 2008 at 01:47 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 11:50 PM
  #633  
MACHC5's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: Central New Jersey
CLK63 Black, E350 Wagon, Supercharged Denali, Lotus Elise, Tesla Model 3 Dual-Motor.
Quote:
I hate to break this to you, but results have been and will continue to come in regardless of whether or not you attempt to complete the flawed test above. I don't mean this in a disrespectful manner but you posting said results would just result in more misinformation on this site, which we definitely don't need.
Nevertheless, do what you want.

At this point I'd like to offer you a refund in exchange for us taking you back to stock, you obviously aren't happy with your ECU/TCU gains, as such you can always run stock again or maybe try a PC tune? We have all the objective and accurate CLK BS 63 data we need at this point.


Thanks[/QUOTE]



Andy,

Let me mull over the generous offer to put me back to stock, with a full refund, as I'm out of town on business this week, and I'll get back to you...

Jim
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 05:39 AM
  #634  
MB_Forever's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 10:42 AM
  #635  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
I'm not really sure what is going on here and the last thing I want to do is get involved in a pissing contest with two forum members that I really like. Jim, my ability to read between the lines is pretty good, I am taking from all this that you are un-happy with your MHP tune, correct? What are you un-happy about? Your 11.7 e/t is pretty darn impressive for a car which is otherwise bone stock (at least to the best of my knowledge), over 2/10th's quicker than your previous best e/t you had posted if I'm not mistaken. 11.7 puts you 4th on the 63 list, and you have the fewest mods of any of us. I would be proud of that time, hell you even beat the CLS 63 that was running a 100 shot of NOS.

I hope you guys can work things out and come to an agreement.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #636  
juicee63's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 4
From: Hollywood CA
2011 twin turboed prius
Originally Posted by jrcart
I'm not really sure what is going on here and the last thing I want to do is get involved in a pissing contest with two forum members that I really like. Jim, my ability to read between the lines is pretty good, I am taking from all this that you are un-happy with your MHP tune, correct? What are you un-happy about? Your 11.7 e/t is pretty darn impressive for a car which is otherwise bone stock (at least to the best of my knowledge), over 2/10th's quicker than your previous best e/t you had posted if I'm not mistaken. 11.7 puts you 4th on the 63 list, and you have the fewest mods of any of us. I would be proud of that time, hell you even beat the CLS 63 that was running a 100 shot of NOS.

I hope you guys can work things out and come to an agreement.
I agree , and was equally impressed with the trap speed.
Maybe we are all reading too much into this and James simply want's imperical data to further solidify the MHP tune results.

Andy has done the right thing by offering a full refund and stock flash, really no one loses here as the data will be at the very least interesting and likely help MHP after results are in. Seems like most MHP cars have done well but as with all tuning there will be unsatisfied customers etc..

So do we all agree the ECU needs to be "adapted" prior to use?

I know my ecu , seems stock although tuned needs retraining after the wife drives

Jim great post , and attitude.

After Saturday the 13th hopefully the "list" has some new elevens
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #637  
MB_Forever's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by jrcart
I'm not really sure what is going on here and the last thing I want to do is get involved in a pissing contest with two forum members that I really like. Jim, my ability to read between the lines is pretty good, I am taking from all this that you are un-happy with your MHP tune, correct? What are you un-happy about? Your 11.7 e/t is pretty darn impressive for a car which is otherwise bone stock (at least to the best of my knowledge), over 2/10th's quicker than your previous best e/t you had posted if I'm not mistaken. 11.7 puts you 4th on the 63 list, and you have the fewest mods of any of us. I would be proud of that time, hell you even beat the CLS 63 that was running a 100 shot of NOS.

I hope you guys can work things out and come to an agreement.
Very good post Jim, and I agree to everything you posted here. Jim's car is very impressive not only in ET and trap, but more specifically in it's consistency I wish my car would be as consistent as his. Everytime I run the car back to back, I lose 0.1 seconds in E.T. up to about 0.4 seconds then it stablizes. I think the average of his runs before were 12.0 while the average of his runs now are 11.7 However, his test would still be awesome to see...... it will show how much the ECU adaptations affect (or doesn't affect) the performance. It should also give a good idea on the difference between the two tunes.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 06:55 PM
  #638  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Hey Josh and Andy, take a look at this...another C63 running mid 11's



Josh, make sure you get this guy to send you timeslips. I think that makes 10 63's in the 11's now after you update the list with this weekends times?

https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...s-122-mph.html
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 07:00 PM
  #639  
MHP's Avatar
MHP
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
'09 C63 AMG
Post

Originally Posted by jrcart
Hey Josh and Andy, take a look at this...another C63 running mid 11's



Josh, make sure you get this guy to send you timeslips. I think that makes 10 63's in the 11's now after you update the list with this weekends times?

https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...s-122-mph.html
Keith is a super nice guy, congrats to him for some great passes!

He's running a MKB ECU, filters, and headers and just removed his secondary cats prior to saturdays racing.

Hopefully he can make MIR in the spring.


Josh,

Keith and I were talking about our 1/8 mile traps. He seemed to be in the 93-94 range while I was in the 95-96 range despite some of his 1/4 traps going 120-122. I think the stock exhaust (specifically the 2 3/8" neckdown in the OEM exhaust manifolds and 4 cats) are playing a fairly significant role in choking my car in the backhalf.

Last edited by MHP; Dec 15, 2008 at 07:22 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 08:10 PM
  #640  
juicee63's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 4
From: Hollywood CA
2011 twin turboed prius
Originally Posted by MHP
Keith is a super nice guy, congrats to him for some great passes!

He's running a MKB ECU, filters, and headers and just removed his secondary cats prior to saturdays racing.

Hopefully he can make MIR in the spring.


Josh,

Keith and I were talking about our 1/8 mile traps. He seemed to be in the 93-94 range while I was in the 95-96 range despite some of his 1/4 traps going 120-122. I think the stock exhaust (specifically the 2 3/8" neckdown in the OEM exhaust manifolds and 4 cats) are playing a fairly significant role in choking my car in the backhalf.

Amazing just amazing. pretty soon I wont even be on the flippin list, Rick wheres your slips brah
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 08:15 PM
  #641  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by juicee63
Amazing just amazing. pretty soon I wont even be on the flippin list, Rick wheres your slips brah
...and they said 63's where slow

That is actually 11 63's with E/T's in the 11's if you count both my NOS and motor only pass.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #642  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Josh, this is your damn list and you're not even in the top 10 or in the 11's yet...you better get going boy! Maybe I'll let you draft me at Famosa, would that count?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 11:08 PM
  #643  
juicee63's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 4
From: Hollywood CA
2011 twin turboed prius
Originally Posted by jrcart
Josh, this is your damn list and you're not even in the top 10 or in the 11's yet...you better get going boy! Maybe I'll let you draft me at Famosa, would that count?

yeah man Im not feeling so good now....Im gonna really need to step it up.

I guess if you drive my car to the 11's at least my car will be on the list !!

I am fairly certain I can reclaim the CLS crown at least with a few choice m o d s.


Man I need to update the list but I dont wanna knock my car that far down LOL
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 11:10 PM
  #644  
chiromikey's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 207
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
josh, you know i only way a buck fifty soaking wet so if you're close, i'll get you there!
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 02:26 AM
  #645  
rarfinancial's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
From: S.D Cali
CLS63
Josh, How are these #'s with stock tune..... and crap 60' 1.9/ all day

1/8 96.04
1/4 11.75@122.86
NOS RUN/Just the tip lots more left
Puts This CLS63 #2 on the NOS list

1/4 12.04@117.27 N/A
1/4 12.08@118.26 N/A
WITH STOCK ECU
SHOULD PUT US UP ON THE LIST

All these while hot lapping. Only cooled the car down twice all day at Famoso
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 11:57 AM
  #646  
juicee63's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 4
From: Hollywood CA
2011 twin turboed prius
Originally Posted by rarfinancial
Josh, How are these #'s with stock tune..... and crap 60' 1.9/ all day

1/8 96.04
1/4 11.75@122.86
NOS RUN/Just the tip lots more left
Puts This CLS63 #2 on the NOS list

1/4 12.04@117.27 N/A
1/4 12.08@118.26 N/A
WITH STOCK ECU
SHOULD PUT US UP ON THE LIST

All these while hot lapping. Only cooled the car down twice all day at Famoso
yep our cars were just dead off the line, mine also 1.9x 60fts. I think you trapped 118.6x on a run as well?? I thought I saw two of your slips in 118 range. Anyway take a pic and email the slips or scan em so I can get all the data updated .

Definately there is a few ticks left in the CLS.

even a 1.85 60 gets you in the 11's
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 04:49 PM
  #647  
MB_Forever's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by juicee63
yep our cars were just dead off the line, mine also 1.9x 60fts. I think you trapped 118.6x on a run as well?? I thought I saw two of your slips in 118 range. Anyway take a pic and email the slips or scan em so I can get all the data updated .

Definately there is a few ticks left in the CLS.

even a 1.85 60 gets you in the 11's
Correction, Lisa did
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #648  
TTC6TTM's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: NYC/South Beach
Twin Turbo C6, S65,
Originally Posted by JT55
I been quiet here awhile but im going to officially say im good for at least an 11.2 when i come out again in say MArch - April.
I had the 11.4 on my 9th run in a row!
only stopping to swap tires - first time to the drag strip in 15 yrs and a slammed suspension and 1100 miles on the motor.

I'll have the proper tires a better ride height and a more broken in motor.
and maybe some more tricks up my sleeve.

But it will prob. be moot by then Jim will prob. be running 9's by March.

I def. left some on the table.
What type of tricks are you thinking about? The car is absolutely beautiful! You did an amazing job putting it together.

I saw the video and it looked like the ride height worked quite well since there was very little squat when you launched. I think that helped you run that record breaking time that you did.

How about running some NOS? HP/TQ in a bottle!
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #649  
juicee63's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 4
From: Hollywood CA
2011 twin turboed prius
MO, RICK, I need your best runs plastered on here so I can update my list.

Comon fellas,

plus Keith's run in his C63
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #650  
MB_Forever's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by juicee63
MO, RICK, I need your best runs plastered on here so I can update my list.

Comon fellas,

plus Keith's run in his C63

Josh, my run was so close to what I had before, so I don't think it's worth it to update my spot. Maybe next time, I can shave another 0.1 or so if DA is good and it doesn't rain.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE