W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Supercharger for AMG 63s (M156)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-25-2008, 09:33 AM
  #151  
Super Member
 
Mathmik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: MARYLAND
Posts: 680
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14-F Sport, 07-CLS63 2003-HUMMER 2004-Suburban 2008-MAX 2005-YZF R1
Yeah............ the wife won't let me SPEND $20K on top of VOIDing the Warranty! yikes!
Old 05-26-2008, 11:54 AM
  #152  
Senior Member
 
R. Range's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 295
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'10 E63
Why would you go to the trouble of developing a new manifold for a 63 Kenne Bell system that will be significantly limited without changing the engine internals and lowering compression when you could do the same thing for the 55K cars that are already set up for FI? And not to mention the fact that there are many, many more of the 55K cars on the road already, and with bargain basement prices on a lot of them the market for the systems would be far larger. It's been apparent for several years that the major limitation on getting more power out of the 55K engine is the factory supercharger, and I do not understand why someone hasn't engineered a replacement blower for it that can move more air (and a KB would be a great choice).
Old 05-26-2008, 12:19 PM
  #153  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Vadim @ FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S600TT, R350
Why would you go to the trouble of developing a new manifold for a 63 Kenne Bell system that will be significantly limited without changing the engine internals and lowering compression
Please see earlier posts in this thread for answers on why.

I do not understand why someone hasn't engineered a replacement blower for it that can move more air (and a KB would be a great choice).
Who says we are not working on one.......
Old 05-26-2008, 01:08 PM
  #154  
Senior Member
 
R. Range's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 295
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'10 E63
Originally Posted by Vadim @ VRP
Who says we are not working on one.......
Thanks for the reply Vadim, and that would certainly be welcome news.
Old 05-26-2008, 09:20 PM
  #155  
Senior Member
 
G55K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 466
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Vadim @ VRP
Please see earlier posts in this thread for answers on why.



Who says we are not working on one.......

KB for the 55? Where do I sign up?!
Old 05-26-2008, 09:37 PM
  #156  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
Originally Posted by R. Range
Why would you go to the trouble of developing a new manifold for a 63 Kenne Bell system that will be significantly limited without changing the engine internals and lowering compression when you could do the same thing for the 55K cars that are already set up for FI? And not to mention the fact that there are many, many more of the 55K cars on the road already, and with bargain basement prices on a lot of them the market for the systems would be far larger. It's been apparent for several years that the major limitation on getting more power out of the 55K engine is the factory supercharger, and I do not understand why someone hasn't engineered a replacement blower for it that can move more air (and a KB would be a great choice).
i brought this up a while ago and i thought it fell upon deaf ears. to me this would be a better and easier route than twin charging.
Old 05-26-2008, 10:17 PM
  #157  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
juicee63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 6,950
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2007 CLS63 030
please super charge me I cannot take being the 2nd fastest CLS in the USA, I will VRP wrap my ride, HELP ME DR. SPOK.........

How fast would my car be if im doing 12.1@116.5? HELP , HELP , HELP..
Old 05-28-2008, 09:16 PM
  #158  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by juicee63
please super charge me I cannot take being the 2nd fastest CLS in the USA, I will VRP wrap my ride, HELP ME DR. SPOK.........

How fast would my car be if im doing 12.1@116.5? HELP , HELP , HELP..
Just a guess, prolly expect 80-90 rwhp on the low boost kit your times would easily drop into mid 11's @ 122+ mph...

But if you opt for a high boost w/lower compression, I would easily imagine 150+ rwhp & poss high 10's w/traction of course.

Last edited by Thericker; 05-28-2008 at 09:20 PM.
Old 05-29-2008, 08:02 PM
  #159  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,542
Received 1,064 Likes on 853 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Originally Posted by Thericker
Just a guess, prolly expect 80-90 rwhp on the low boost kit your times would easily drop into mid 11's @ 122+ mph...

But if you opt for a high boost w/lower compression, I would easily imagine 150+ rwhp & poss high 10's w/traction of course.
Assuming he is making around 420 RWHP stock, he'll get 80 to 80 RWHP if he is only running 3 PSI. 5 PSI should net around 140+ RWHP with an effective intercooler. 7.35 psi should get your around 50% more power and 14.7 PSI should double the stock power assuming everything else equal. I don't think the stock motor could take 1 bar of boost but it should be able to take 5 to 7 psi with good cooling and a proper tune.
Old 05-30-2008, 05:57 AM
  #160  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
juicee63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 6,950
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2007 CLS63 030
Originally Posted by BlownV8
Assuming he is making around 420 RWHP stock, he'll get 80 to 80 RWHP if he is only running 3 PSI. 5 PSI should net around 140+ RWHP with an effective intercooler. 7.35 psi should get your around 50% more power and 14.7 PSI should double the stock power assuming everything else equal. I don't think the stock motor could take 1 bar of boost but it should be able to take 5 to 7 psi with good cooling and a proper tune.

WOW!

I figured 50-75 hp gains. My car is likely making 430-440 rwhp now, so @6 PSI what would a likely RWHP RWTQ be?
Old 05-30-2008, 12:18 PM
  #161  
Banned
 
vrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Posts: 3,797
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
Because with 6psi of boost we can probably make a nice 600 - 650hp car on stock internals and boltons.

Stage 2 of same setup will be with a BUILT bottom end with hopes of reaching 800hp++... The CLK63 BS Cabriolet that we are building will end up with this configuration when we are done.

On the 55, changing the blower for a bigger one is about as challenging as pulling the blower and replacing it with a TT kit.

You have to get around the electronics for the bypass valve, the supercharger clutch, the programming in the TCU, etc, etc.

If the ECU sees boost during shifts it will go into limp mode. On a normal 55 car, the ECU disengages the clutch, shifts gears, and then re-engages from what I was told. All of this leads to big programming challenges..

It's not to say that SOMEONE isn't already working on a blower replacement though.



Originally Posted by R. Range
Why would you go to the trouble of developing a new manifold for a 63 Kenne Bell system that will be significantly limited without changing the engine internals and lowering compression when you could do the same thing for the 55K cars that are already set up for FI? And not to mention the fact that there are many, many more of the 55K cars on the road already, and with bargain basement prices on a lot of them the market for the systems would be far larger. It's been apparent for several years that the major limitation on getting more power out of the 55K engine is the factory supercharger, and I do not understand why someone hasn't engineered a replacement blower for it that can move more air (and a KB would be a great choice).
Old 05-30-2008, 02:03 PM
  #162  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 AMG - - 2005 SL55 AMG - - - - - - 2006 SLK55 AMG - - - - - - 2013 Ducati Diavel AMG -
Originally Posted by vrus
On the 55, changing the blower for a bigger one is about as challenging as pulling the blower and replacing it with a TT kit.

It's not to say that SOMEONE isn't already working on a blower replacement though.
Who said SOMEONE what?
Hehe!
Old 05-31-2008, 12:19 AM
  #163  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by BlownV8
Assuming he is making around 420 RWHP stock, he'll get 80 to 80 RWHP if he is only running 3 PSI. 5 PSI should net around 140+ RWHP
Sheesh excuse my 10 rwhp ignorance....

Last edited by Thericker; 05-31-2008 at 12:23 AM.
Old 06-06-2008, 02:24 PM
  #164  
Super Member
 
Mathmik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: MARYLAND
Posts: 680
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14-F Sport, 07-CLS63 2003-HUMMER 2004-Suburban 2008-MAX 2005-YZF R1
Any Updates?????
Old 06-07-2008, 02:31 PM
  #165  
Member
 
c350blknav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 C350 fully loaded
Originally Posted by Vadim @ VRP
Over the last several weeks I have had a number of 63 owners expressing interest in forced induction for their cars.

After evaluating a number of possibilities in terms of what to use - turbo or supercharger - I have settled on a twin-screw from Kenne Bell.


Let me try to answer some fore coming questions to best of my knowledge at this time.






1. What kind of power increase can be expected?

Since M156 runs 11.3:1 CR, 3-4 psi will be boost limit for Stage I, as R&D progresses and transmission strength can be verified, more boost would be possible. I am expecting 70HP/70TQ at the wheels at this boost level, more with other mods.


2. Price?

At this time it is hard to predict. I will do everything I can to make it affordable.


3. Will it work with other mods?

Not with software, but with headers, exhaust, intake and so forth should not be a problem.


4. What do I do next?

If you are interested and serious about this kit, I need to hear from you, so I can judge the demand more precisely. Just e-mail me your name, model and contact information.


Thank you for listening.

I am interested but I am a c350 owner, you think it would be possible to make a kit for me. All I wan't is a modest 40-60 hp increase to the wheels.
3-4 psi
Old 06-07-2008, 03:14 PM
  #166  
Senior Member
 
lexaltezza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 CLS63
Originally Posted by c350blknav
I am interested but I am a c350 owner, you think it would be possible to make a kit for me. All I wan't is a modest 40-60 hp increase to the wheels.
3-4 psi
Doubt it. You would be better off trading in for a C63.
Old 06-07-2008, 05:35 PM
  #167  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by c350blknav
I am interested but I am a c350 owner, you think it would be possible to make a kit for me. All I wan't is a modest 40-60 hp increase to the wheels.
3-4 psi
Bro for "All I want is a modest 40-60 hp increase to the wheels." the KB is not going to be cost effective, if you can't afford to move up to a used 63, then slap on some giggle juice! a 50 shot of NOS should be safe enough

& cost thousands less ie.. about $1500-$2k installed

Last edited by Thericker; 06-07-2008 at 05:39 PM.
Old 06-07-2008, 07:59 PM
  #168  
Banned
 
oldgixxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: orange county NY
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'05 C55(sold)'05 E55(sold)'06 911C4S(sold)'06 ML350 '06 CLS55(sold),buncha slo bikes
Originally Posted by Thericker
Bro for "All I want is a modest 40-60 hp increase to the wheels." the KB is not going to be cost effective, if you can't afford to move up to a used 63, then slap on some giggle juice! a 50 shot of NOS should be safe enough

& cost thousands less ie.. about $1500-$2k installed
Exactly!

I'm pretty sure ItallionStallion still has hit wet set-up off of his CLK500 for sale,maybe PM him?
Old 06-07-2008, 09:13 PM
  #169  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by oldgixxer
Exactly!

I'm pretty sure ItallionStallion still has hit wet set-up off of his CLK500 for sale,maybe PM him?
I was thinking the same thing, ItallionStallion's old wet kit..
Old 06-07-2008, 09:47 PM
  #170  
Banned
 
oldgixxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: orange county NY
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'05 C55(sold)'05 E55(sold)'06 911C4S(sold)'06 ML350 '06 CLS55(sold),buncha slo bikes
Originally Posted by Thericker
I was thinking the same thing, ItallionStallion's old wet kit..
Think Bobby will give us each 30% commisssion if he sells his kit now??
Old 06-07-2008, 10:57 PM
  #171  
Member
 
c350blknav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 C350 fully loaded
ha ha very funny. The thing is I have a lease and the negative balance is ten grand. I sat in a few dealerships and carmax and all i could get for the car was 32,500. The payoff was 42,000 after nearly one year of a 4 year lease.

Ok so instead I decided to mod my car to be a little more happy with it. I sunk 4 grand into rims and Kw coilovers.

the lowest monthly I wouldv'e gotten with a ten grand down payment and a Ten grand negative balance added onto my lease was 1247 a month. I pay 721 a month right now. that's 500 dollars more per month.

People whith 5 grand down are getting 1000 dollar a month payments. I just didn't see why the dealer had to make so much money on my trade.

Instead I made an even worse decision and modded. Well now I'm stuck. threw a lot of capital away and I sold my stock wheels. LOL! pretty much in it for the long haul. Just trying to get some better pedal feel and I will get a sprint booster but I definetly need some forced induction on a daily basis. No Nitrous, I don't race. I wan't to just have that supercharger whine and a stiff gas pedal that yanks when you press it. I bought my car last september, I couldn't stand driving my banged up Nissan any longer in order to wait for the C63.

Going to start Graduate school in August and I wan't to be done modding so I can focus on school. Once I get my Masters I will get the c63 or an rs6 or something crazy to make up for right now.

Last edited by c350blknav; 06-07-2008 at 11:00 PM.
Old 06-08-2008, 03:45 AM
  #172  
Out Of Control!!
 
jangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2015 S212
Originally Posted by chiromikey
i brought this up a while ago and i thought it fell upon deaf ears. to me this would be a better and easier route than twin charging.
Why not this PLUS adding a single big turbo before the SC?
Old 06-10-2008, 08:28 PM
  #173  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Vadim @ FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S600TT, R350

Intercooler cores came in and I am working on intake manifold that will house the blower.
Old 06-10-2008, 08:34 PM
  #174  
Super Member
 
Centurion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a car that gets very poor gas mileage.
Old 07-01-2008, 11:05 AM
  #175  
Super Member
 
intellilogic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'12 E350 Coupe (3rd Benz)
Originally Posted by jangy
Why not this PLUS adding a single big turbo before the SC?
Sounds good to me... anyone? anyone?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Supercharger for AMG 63s (M156)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 AM.