W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

M5 Smack talk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 12-26-2010, 09:43 PM
  #176  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Originally Posted by Slow_E60_M5
As for the new S63, look at BMW's X5M and X6M...waaaay heavier but can do 0-60 in 4.3 seconds also.... Logic?
AWD Quit being such a fan boy.
Old 12-27-2010, 02:18 AM
  #177  
Junior Member
 
Slow_E60_M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 BMW M5 and 03 MB SL55 AMG
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
AWD Quit being such a fan boy.
The same X5M/X6M has a 0-200 km (124 mph) in 16.3 seconds. That's very impressive especially for a freaking large heavy truck.
I've been in one and that truck PULLS even after 120 mph! It's really not bad at all.
Old 12-27-2010, 02:24 AM
  #178  
Junior Member
 
Slow_E60_M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 BMW M5 and 03 MB SL55 AMG
Originally Posted by soldier2304
Wow and i thought the C63 vs M3 battle was bad lol. Honestly from what i've seen and encountered(beaten plenty of M5's) an M5 will ALWAYS get beat by a E55 stock vs stock. It is amazing how fast E55 can become with less than 5k. The M guys should stay with their twisties stories and accept already which is the faster car in a straight line, the E.
As much as I believe that you are wrong about the E55 vs. M5 (M5's top end at around 125 mph), I really the admire C63 AMG in general. Nice ride buddy. Sounds and drives very well.

But...I'm confused by this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Lg-z...eature=channel

Perhaps you can explain how a standard Mark I 997 Porsche Carrera S Cabrio held its own???
Old 12-27-2010, 04:15 AM
  #179  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,694
Received 374 Likes on 275 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by Slow_E60_M5
The same X5M/X6M has a 0-200 km (124 mph) in 16.3 seconds. That's very impressive especially for a freaking large heavy truck.
I've been in one and that truck PULLS even after 120 mph! It's really not bad at all.
The new s63 did 0-200 in 13.3 with massive traction problems and it weighed almost 5100 lbs.

If mb can get the next e close to 4400 lbs it will smoke the next M5

Last edited by skratch77; 12-27-2010 at 04:23 AM.
Old 12-27-2010, 06:43 AM
  #180  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mikey33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2004 E55, 1997 E320 "Sold"
Originally Posted by Slow_E60_M5
As much as I believe that you are wrong about the E55 vs. M5 (M5's top end at around 125 mph), I really the admire C63 AMG in general. Nice ride buddy. Sounds and drives very well.

But...I'm confused by this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Lg-z...eature=channel

Perhaps you can explain how a standard Mark I 997 Porsche Carrera S Cabrio held its own???
What a bunch of tards in that video

They sound like school children lmao, 150-160-200-220-250-255 haha
Old 12-27-2010, 08:57 AM
  #181  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
emoving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,226
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
3-five-five/ TUNDRA/ 07 997 cab
Originally Posted by Slow_E60_M5
As much as I believe that you are wrong about the E55 vs. M5 (M5's top end at around 125 mph), I really the admire C63 AMG in general. Nice ride buddy. Sounds and drives very well.

But...I'm confused by this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Lg-z...eature=channel

Perhaps you can explain how a standard Mark I 997 Porsche Carrera S Cabrio held its own???
Because your butt buddy Gustav probally rigged that video with a different car. Most those videos are scams biased against the Benz. A C63 would smoke a Standard 997.
Old 12-27-2010, 11:29 AM
  #182  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chawkins2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,659
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
This morning I heard an ad on the radio saying, " why do so many car manufacturers compare themselves to BMW?" It is simple, they are the bench mark for SLOW *** cars No wonder they don't have torque management problems, they don't make any TQ.
Old 12-27-2010, 12:00 PM
  #183  
Super Member
 
Infiniti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 935
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
a unicorn tuned p30 e63
I cant believe this thread is still going....
Old 12-27-2010, 01:42 PM
  #184  
Super Member
 
BenzoDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: HTX-->ATL -->CHI
Posts: 798
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2015 E63S 4Matic
Originally Posted by E55Dimon
I've looked at the w211 e55 and e92 335 for way over a year prior to making a purchase. The two cars are in completely different leagues..its actually pretty comical to me now that I considered the e92 prior to the AMG. And I very well know what the 335i is capable of blah blah.

Funny that when I finally found the right e55, there was a new e92 sitting next to it in then lot, 6-speed too. I grinned and never looked back again.



As for the rest of the thread, its pretty awesome lol, and the rivalry will never end E55 ftw!
I've got a 335xi and E55, among others. I think the 335 is a wonderful car for the price point, and for what it is.

If I had $40k to spend on a brand new car, that's exactly what I'd purchase, because the bang for your buck/fit and finish is unparalleled. There's no comparable MB, and BMW would get [and did get] my money.

With that said, the E9X M3 is garbage, even compared to the 335. It's simply a $75k S2000. And that's with a Porsche Club Instructor Twisties Bias.

With that said, this E55/M5 argument is asinine. If a man or woman considering an M5 or E55 chose based on raw 1/4 mile time, I'd say that Darwin couldn't catch up with them fast enough. There are so many other more important things to factor in.
Old 12-27-2010, 01:48 PM
  #185  
Super Member
 
BenzoDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: HTX-->ATL -->CHI
Posts: 798
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2015 E63S 4Matic
Originally Posted by AUS-E55
On a side note, I got a chance to have a ride in a very fast 996 GT2 last week, trust me when I say this thing make's both of them look slow, LOL !! My hands were shaking when I got out of the car.
Didn't happen to be the silver one from the woodlands?
Old 12-27-2010, 02:43 PM
  #186  
Junior Member
 
Slow_E60_M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 BMW M5 and 03 MB SL55 AMG
Originally Posted by emoving
Because your butt buddy Gustav probally rigged that video with a different car. Most those videos are scams biased against the Benz. A C63 would smoke a Standard 997.
Butt buddy? Why, how very mature of you! Thanks for the compliment.

If they're biased againt Benzes, then how and why would the owners of such AMGs and Benzes LOSE intentionally? No excuse for failing I/C Pump for a N/A 6.2 Liter in a C63.

As for proof that these GTboard vids are NOT biased....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7hiIjDdSiA
Old 12-27-2010, 04:52 PM
  #187  
Senior Member
 
AUS-E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 487
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
CLK-63 BLACK/2014 E63S/2013 ML350
Originally Posted by BenzoDoc
Didn't happen to be the silver one from the woodlands?
No it was a yellow one, but that one is quick as well !!
Old 12-28-2010, 11:13 AM
  #188  
Member
 
Limen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55 AMG, CL65 AMG, S8, S6, E30 M3, Z3MC
Originally Posted by Slow_E60_M5
If they're biased againt Benzes, then how and why would the owners of such AMGs and Benzes LOSE intentionally? No excuse for failing I/C Pump for a N/A 6.2 Liter in a C63.
I'm suprised people still think this is a valid argument here. I thought it was pretty much known that the "modern" AMG's are faster in a line, M's are faster in the curvs.

Last edited by Limen; 12-28-2010 at 03:06 PM. Reason: typo
Old 12-28-2010, 11:01 PM
  #189  
Junior Member
 
trapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: east, TN Knoxville
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 c63,09 CaymanS,08 VW Touaregv10tdi,99vette hardtop,Triumph1050Tiger,Kaw,klr 650
Well...I have entertained myself for the past half hour laughing through this thread.

I had a fully modded 135 for the first year and enjoyed the little car. With all the bolt-ons it is quick in a straight line.
I never had the dreaded hpfp problem many had (some multiple times) but was allways worried when it would come to me. That BMW did not do twisties well...maybe with serious suspension upgrades it would have been better.

Well I dumped the 135 for a Porsche Cayman S with dfi and pdk...the twisties are big fun and the latest dfi is quicker than most think. While the P car is great fun on a road course I missed the TQ from the n54 and was able to talk my wife into the C63.

I now have a good stable imho...two totally different cars that makes me happy on different days depending on my mood. What I have learned from this thread is Maybe BMW akes a great suv in the x5m x6m....now that would be nice threesome...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: M5 Smack talk



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 PM.