W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

tire rack is on crack-help please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-27-2011, 12:26 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
itsfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NoVa
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E55
tire rack is on crack-help please

Can anyone help me with tire sizes for 20x8.50 front and 20x9.50 rear wheels? I spoke with a rep. at tirerack and he told me i needed 245/30/20 in the front and 265/30/20 in the rear for proper height and fitment. He said in no way would a 275 or 285 fit in the rear on a 9.5 inch rim. Ive always trusted tirerack through the years but this doesnt sound right. Also the front rims are offset at 35mm and was told i may need spacers to clear the brakes. any thoughts? thanks so much for the help/opinions

*the vehicle suspension is stock*
Old 03-27-2011, 12:32 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AKnight55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NH
Posts: 6,752
Received 92 Likes on 72 Posts
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
245/30/20 Front and 275/25/20 or 285/25/20 Rear
Old 03-27-2011, 01:45 AM
  #3  
Super Member
 
Viet_Amg408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pinto
put 275 or 285 on a x9.5 wide will make you look like you on crack..



245/30/20 in the front and 265/30/20 is correct..
Old 03-27-2011, 01:54 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
desired_speeds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
2007 SL55 AMG
275 will be fine.
Old 03-27-2011, 10:59 AM
  #5  
Member
 
randallaguirre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PHX & Huntsville
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2010 Silverado, 03 H2, 66 Nova SS, 03 E55
I have 285/30-19s on a 9.5 rear rim. They tuck no problem and I like the way the tire is slightly wider than the rim---just in case I tap a curb.
Old 03-27-2011, 11:16 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
JayhawkPharmD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Central FL
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 C250 coupe; 2007 E63 AMG (sold)
I have 275/30/20 on the rear. No problems. Good luck.
Old 03-27-2011, 09:38 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by Viet_Amg408
put 275 or 285 on a x9.5 wide will make you look like you on crack..

245/30/20 in the front and 265/30/20 is correct..
:r olf:

You don't know how wrong you are.....
Old 03-27-2011, 09:43 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AKnight55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NH
Posts: 6,752
Received 92 Likes on 72 Posts
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
Originally Posted by Viet_Amg408
put 275 or 285 on a x9.5 wide will make you look like you on crack..



245/30/20 in the front and 265/30/20 is correct..
Yea not sure about that... I run a 275 on a 9.5 inch wheel.. You need all the traction you can get with these cars and a 265 is certainly not doing you any good.. Clearly your going for the stretch tire look, the majority of people aren't going for that look.
Old 03-28-2011, 10:29 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
komp55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
ML550
When you're buying tires for a specific size rim as a "plus size" fitment, there are two primary considerations. The first is to make sure that the overall tire diameter is as close as possible to the OE size tire. This is necessary because it affects the overall gearing of the car, as well as the accuracy of the car's speedometer. The second consideration is whether the tire size in question is an approved size for the wheel you plan to mount it on. This second consideration is more important from a safety standpoint than the first issue, particularly with very low profile tires, because the design integrity of the sidewall can be compromised if it's pinched in by mounting it on a wheel too narrow for it, or by stretching it out to mount on a wheel that's too wide for it. This is why every single tire manufacturer specifies the approved rim width range for a particular tire size they manufacture; if you mount the tire on a wheel the tire wasn't designed for, it's on you - not them; your life, not theirs.

Let's look at the above information in the context of a W211 E55, which came from the factory fitted with 245/40/18 front and 265/35/18 rear tires mounted on 8" and 9" wide wheels, front and rear respectively. The stock overall tire diameters are 25.72" front and 25.3" rear. This means your plus size fitment ought to be as close as possible to these respective diameters in order to retain the correct gearing of the car and its speedometer accuracy.

Tire Rack's recommendation for the front size is correct. A 245/30/20 has an overall diameter of 25.79", which is almost identical to the stock size of 25.72". You're concerned about Tire Rack's recommendation of a 265/30/20 for the rear. Given the wheel width you've indicated of only 9.5", that's also an appropriate recommedation since the approved rim range for that size tire is 9" - 10". The next size wider tire, a 275/30/20, also requires a 9" - 10" rim, but its overall diameter is way too tall, coming in at 26.5" - which is over a full inch taller that the stock tire diameter and is not recommended. The tire size that does work is the 285/25/20, with its diameter of 25.61". Unfortunately for you, this size tire requires wheels with a 10" - 11" width for safe mounting, with most tire manufacturers specifying use of a 10.5" wide wheel only. It's just dumb to mount this size tire on a rim it wasn't designed for.

A third factor to also take a look at is the load range of the tires in question. In the case of 20" wheels on an E55, there's little doubt that the correct size front tire, a 245/30/20, is way down at the lower end of a safe load index for a heavy car like the W211 chassis, while the correct sized tire for the rear, a 285/25/20 has a completely sufficient load range. If load range issues concern you, then consider using a 255/30/20 in front, but know that it will be about a quarter of an inch taller than the stock tire diameter, which isn't much different than the 285/25/20's diameter is over its equivalent stock diameter of 25.3."
Old 03-28-2011, 12:35 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by komp55
When you're buying tires for a specific size rim as a "plus size" fitment, there are two primary considerations. The first is to make sure that the overall tire diameter is as close as possible to the OE size tire. This is necessary because it affects the overall gearing of the car, as well as the accuracy of the car's speedometer. The second consideration is whether the tire size in question is an approved size for the wheel you plan to mount it on. This second consideration is more important from a safety standpoint than the first issue, particularly with very low profile tires, because the design integrity of the sidewall can be compromised if it's pinched in by mounting it on a wheel too narrow for it, or by stretching it out to mount on a wheel that's too wide for it. This is why every single tire manufacturer specifies the approved rim width range for a particular tire size they manufacture; if you mount the tire on a wheel the tire wasn't designed for, it's on you - not them; your life, not theirs.

Let's look at the above information in the context of a W211 E55, which came from the factory fitted with 245/40/18 front and 265/35/18 rear tires mounted on 8" and 9" wide wheels, front and rear respectively. The stock overall tire diameters are 25.72" front and 25.3" rear. This means your plus size fitment ought to be as close as possible to these respective diameters in order to retain the correct gearing of the car and its speedometer accuracy.

Tire Rack's recommendation for the front size is correct. A 245/30/20 has an overall diameter of 25.79", which is almost identical to the stock size of 25.72". You're concerned about Tire Rack's recommendation of a 265/30/20 for the rear. Given the wheel width you've indicated of only 9.5", that's also an appropriate recommedation since the approved rim range for that size tire is 9" - 10". The next size wider tire, a 275/30/20, also requires a 9" - 10" rim, but its overall diameter is way too tall, coming in at 26.5" - which is over a full inch taller that the stock tire diameter and is not recommended. The tire size that does work is the 285/25/20, with its diameter of 25.61". Unfortunately for you, this size tire requires wheels with a 10" - 11" width for safe mounting, with most tire manufacturers specifying use of a 10.5" wide wheel only. It's just dumb to mount this size tire on a rim it wasn't designed for.

A third factor to also take a look at is the load range of the tires in question. In the case of 20" wheels on an E55, there's little doubt that the correct size front tire, a 245/30/20, is way down at the lower end of a safe load index for a heavy car like the W211 chassis, while the correct sized tire for the rear, a 285/25/20 has a completely sufficient load range. If load range issues concern you, then consider using a 255/30/20 in front, but know that it will be about a quarter of an inch taller than the stock tire diameter, which isn't much different than the 285/25/20's diameter is over its equivalent stock diameter of 25.3."
275/25_20
25.4" diameter

done
Old 03-28-2011, 01:48 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
komp55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
ML550
Originally Posted by HeissRod
275/25_20
25.4" diameter

done

Bad choice. Here's specs for that size tire:

Specifications for tire
size: 275/25 20

UTQG: 220 AA A
Load Index: 91
Max Inflation Pressure: 50 psi
Tread Depth: 10/32nd"
Rim Width Range: 10.5-11.5
Meas. Rim Width: 10.5
Section Width: 10.5"
Tread Width: 11.9"
Overall Height: 25.8"
Revolutions per Mile: 805

Not designed for a 9.5" rim. Plus, load index on a 275/25/20 is only 91. Load index on the stock 265/35/18 is 97. Huge difference in safety margin. I wouldn't run this size on a 9.5" wide rim under any circumstances.
Old 03-28-2011, 02:16 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
All that is a moot point at TireRack doesn't carry a 275/25_20

P.S. Where did you get your specs? You have the diameter listed as 25.8"? You sure you aren't looking at specs for a 295/25_20?

Last edited by HeissRod; 03-28-2011 at 02:22 PM.
Old 03-28-2011, 02:29 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AKnight55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NH
Posts: 6,752
Received 92 Likes on 72 Posts
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
Originally Posted by komp55
Bad choice. Here's specs for that size tire:

Specifications for tire
size: 275/25 20

UTQG: 220 AA A
Load Index: 91
Max Inflation Pressure: 50 psi
Tread Depth: 10/32nd"
Rim Width Range: 10.5-11.5
Meas. Rim Width: 10.5
Section Width: 10.5"
Tread Width: 11.9"
Overall Height: 25.8"
Revolutions per Mile: 805

Not designed for a 9.5" rim. Plus, load index on a 275/25/20 is only 91. Load index on the stock 265/35/18 is 97. Huge difference in safety margin. I wouldn't run this size on a 9.5" wide rim under any circumstances.
Im not sure what your talking about... A 275 tire fits perfectly on a 9.5 inch wheel... This is my exact set up..A 285 tire will even work on a 9.5 inch wheel..

To the OP, go with a 285/25/20 as so many have already done..

Komp55... I just looked at one of your old posts and it says your running a 275 on a 9.5 wheel, so where do you come off saying it wont work??

Last edited by AKnight55; 03-28-2011 at 02:41 PM.
Old 03-28-2011, 02:47 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
komp55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
ML550
Originally Posted by andrew knight
Komp55... I just looked at one of your old posts and it says your running a 275 on a 9.5 wheel, so where do you come off saying it wont work??
On a 19" rim. With a 30 aspect ratio. Big difference.
Old 03-28-2011, 06:49 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AKnight55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NH
Posts: 6,752
Received 92 Likes on 72 Posts
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
Originally Posted by komp55
On a 19" rim. With a 30 aspect ratio. Big difference.
so your saying on a 20" rim a 275/25/20 or 285/25/20 wouldn't work on a 9.5 inch wheel?? That doesn't make sense..
Old 03-28-2011, 06:54 PM
  #16  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Staff@RPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, just to state what I am using on a 20"x9.5" wheel is a 295/25-20 Conti. I think it's crazy to stretch a 265 onto a 9.5" wheel.

I'm not a big fan of the stretched look so I went with a wider tire, just my taste.

Last edited by Staff@RPM; 03-28-2011 at 06:57 PM.
Old 03-28-2011, 08:26 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
komp55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
ML550
Originally Posted by andrew knight
so your saying on a 20" rim a 275/25/20 or 285/25/20 wouldn't work on a 9.5 inch wheel?? That doesn't make sense..
Let me explain it again. There is a significant difference between what size tire you can physically mount on a particular rim and what size rim width is specified for a particular size tire. I'm saying a 285/25/20 tire should NOT be mounted on a 9.5" rim because the rim is narrower than what the tire was designed for. Most tire manufacturers specify a 10.5" wide rim for this size. Same issue for a 275/25/20 tire. The minimum specified rim width is 10" (see Nitto Invo specifications for this size tire at Nitto's website). Plus, this size doesn't have a sufficient load index for a heavy car like the W211, so it's an unsafe choice from that perspective as well.

Can both size tires be mounted on a 9.5" wide 20" diameter wheel? Of course, but that's why we have stuff like the annual Darwin awards. YMMV.
Old 03-28-2011, 09:08 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AKnight55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NH
Posts: 6,752
Received 92 Likes on 72 Posts
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
Originally Posted by komp55
Let me explain it again. There is a significant difference between what size tire you can physically mount on a particular rim and what size rim width is specified for a particular size tire. I'm saying a 285/25/20 tire should NOT be mounted on a 9.5" rim because the rim is narrower than what the tire was designed for. Most tire manufacturers specify a 10.5" wide rim for this size. Same issue for a 275/25/20 tire. The minimum specified rim width is 10" (see Nitto Invo specifications for this size tire at Nitto's website). Plus, this size doesn't have a sufficient load index for a heavy car like the W211, so it's an unsafe choice from that perspective as well.

Can both size tires be mounted on a 9.5" wide 20" diameter wheel? Of course, but that's why we have stuff like the annual Darwin awards. YMMV.
OEM is a 265 on a 9" wheel, so I would needing a 10" wheel for a 275 is a bit conservative. Personally I'd go with a 285/25/20 and roll the fenders a bit to avoid any rubbing...
Old 03-31-2011, 08:23 AM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GregMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The Granite State
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
.
Originally Posted by andrew knight
OEM is a 265 on a 9" wheel, so I would needing a 10" wheel for a 275 is a bit conservative. Personally I'd go with a 285/25/20 and roll the fenders a bit to avoid any rubbing...
Is there any wheel offset that will allow for the use of a 285-width tire without resorting to rolling the rear fenders? Tucking the wheel in a little deeper into the wheel well may just move the problem from the fender lip to rubbing against the suspension bits....


-G
Old 03-31-2011, 03:49 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by GregMB
Is there any wheel offset that will allow for the use of a 285-width tire without resorting to rolling the rear fenders? Tucking the wheel in a little deeper into the wheel well may just move the problem from the fender lip to rubbing against the suspension bits....

-G
Lots of cars here run 285s. I'm running 285s on a 10.5" wheel and I'm lowered with STAR.
Old 04-01-2011, 11:18 AM
  #21  
Member
 
dychen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: PHX and NYC
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
11 QX56, 09 E63, 00 S2000
Aren't the P30 package wheels 9.5" wide running a 265 tire in the rear?
Old 04-01-2011, 11:29 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,693
Received 374 Likes on 275 Posts
2005 E55
I thought e55s had 9.5 in the rears?

When I ordered my wheels they kept pushing me to get a 10 in wide wheel but I told them I wanted to run a 265 or a 275 max on them.

I ended up going 18x9.5 in the rears with a 275/35/18
Old 04-02-2011, 04:03 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AKnight55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NH
Posts: 6,752
Received 92 Likes on 72 Posts
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
Originally Posted by skratch77
I thought e55s had 9.5 in the rears?

When I ordered my wheels they kept pushing me to get a 10 in wide wheel but I told them I wanted to run a 265 or a 275 max on them.

I ended up going 18x9.5 in the rears with a 275/35/18
Stock e55 wheels are 9" rears, im almost positive..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: tire rack is on crack-help please



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 AM.