W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63

tire rack is on crack-help please

Old Mar 27, 2011 | 12:26 AM
  #1  
itsfast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: NoVa
2004 E55
tire rack is on crack-help please

Can anyone help me with tire sizes for 20x8.50 front and 20x9.50 rear wheels? I spoke with a rep. at tirerack and he told me i needed 245/30/20 in the front and 265/30/20 in the rear for proper height and fitment. He said in no way would a 275 or 285 fit in the rear on a 9.5 inch rim. Ive always trusted tirerack through the years but this doesnt sound right. Also the front rims are offset at 35mm and was told i may need spacers to clear the brakes. any thoughts? thanks so much for the help/opinions

*the vehicle suspension is stock*
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 12:32 AM
  #2  
AKnight55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,759
Likes: 96
From: NH
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
245/30/20 Front and 275/25/20 or 285/25/20 Rear
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 01:45 AM
  #3  
Viet_Amg408's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 870
Likes: 1
Pinto
put 275 or 285 on a x9.5 wide will make you look like you on crack..



245/30/20 in the front and 265/30/20 is correct..
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 01:54 AM
  #4  
desired_speeds's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 38
From: Bay Area, CA
2007 SL55 AMG
275 will be fine.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 10:59 AM
  #5  
randallaguirre's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 214
Likes: 1
From: PHX & Huntsville
2010 Silverado, 03 H2, 66 Nova SS, 03 E55
I have 285/30-19s on a 9.5 rear rim. They tuck no problem and I like the way the tire is slightly wider than the rim---just in case I tap a curb.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 11:16 AM
  #6  
JayhawkPharmD's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Central FL
2012 C250 coupe; 2007 E63 AMG (sold)
I have 275/30/20 on the rear. No problems. Good luck.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 09:38 PM
  #7  
HeissRod's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,429
Likes: 61
From: Cypress, TX
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by Viet_Amg408
put 275 or 285 on a x9.5 wide will make you look like you on crack..

245/30/20 in the front and 265/30/20 is correct..
:r olf:

You don't know how wrong you are.....
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 09:43 PM
  #8  
AKnight55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,759
Likes: 96
From: NH
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
Originally Posted by Viet_Amg408
put 275 or 285 on a x9.5 wide will make you look like you on crack..



245/30/20 in the front and 265/30/20 is correct..
Yea not sure about that... I run a 275 on a 9.5 inch wheel.. You need all the traction you can get with these cars and a 265 is certainly not doing you any good.. Clearly your going for the stretch tire look, the majority of people aren't going for that look.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 10:29 AM
  #9  
komp55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 6
ML550
When you're buying tires for a specific size rim as a "plus size" fitment, there are two primary considerations. The first is to make sure that the overall tire diameter is as close as possible to the OE size tire. This is necessary because it affects the overall gearing of the car, as well as the accuracy of the car's speedometer. The second consideration is whether the tire size in question is an approved size for the wheel you plan to mount it on. This second consideration is more important from a safety standpoint than the first issue, particularly with very low profile tires, because the design integrity of the sidewall can be compromised if it's pinched in by mounting it on a wheel too narrow for it, or by stretching it out to mount on a wheel that's too wide for it. This is why every single tire manufacturer specifies the approved rim width range for a particular tire size they manufacture; if you mount the tire on a wheel the tire wasn't designed for, it's on you - not them; your life, not theirs.

Let's look at the above information in the context of a W211 E55, which came from the factory fitted with 245/40/18 front and 265/35/18 rear tires mounted on 8" and 9" wide wheels, front and rear respectively. The stock overall tire diameters are 25.72" front and 25.3" rear. This means your plus size fitment ought to be as close as possible to these respective diameters in order to retain the correct gearing of the car and its speedometer accuracy.

Tire Rack's recommendation for the front size is correct. A 245/30/20 has an overall diameter of 25.79", which is almost identical to the stock size of 25.72". You're concerned about Tire Rack's recommendation of a 265/30/20 for the rear. Given the wheel width you've indicated of only 9.5", that's also an appropriate recommedation since the approved rim range for that size tire is 9" - 10". The next size wider tire, a 275/30/20, also requires a 9" - 10" rim, but its overall diameter is way too tall, coming in at 26.5" - which is over a full inch taller that the stock tire diameter and is not recommended. The tire size that does work is the 285/25/20, with its diameter of 25.61". Unfortunately for you, this size tire requires wheels with a 10" - 11" width for safe mounting, with most tire manufacturers specifying use of a 10.5" wide wheel only. It's just dumb to mount this size tire on a rim it wasn't designed for.

A third factor to also take a look at is the load range of the tires in question. In the case of 20" wheels on an E55, there's little doubt that the correct size front tire, a 245/30/20, is way down at the lower end of a safe load index for a heavy car like the W211 chassis, while the correct sized tire for the rear, a 285/25/20 has a completely sufficient load range. If load range issues concern you, then consider using a 255/30/20 in front, but know that it will be about a quarter of an inch taller than the stock tire diameter, which isn't much different than the 285/25/20's diameter is over its equivalent stock diameter of 25.3."
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 12:35 PM
  #10  
HeissRod's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,429
Likes: 61
From: Cypress, TX
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by komp55
When you're buying tires for a specific size rim as a "plus size" fitment, there are two primary considerations. The first is to make sure that the overall tire diameter is as close as possible to the OE size tire. This is necessary because it affects the overall gearing of the car, as well as the accuracy of the car's speedometer. The second consideration is whether the tire size in question is an approved size for the wheel you plan to mount it on. This second consideration is more important from a safety standpoint than the first issue, particularly with very low profile tires, because the design integrity of the sidewall can be compromised if it's pinched in by mounting it on a wheel too narrow for it, or by stretching it out to mount on a wheel that's too wide for it. This is why every single tire manufacturer specifies the approved rim width range for a particular tire size they manufacture; if you mount the tire on a wheel the tire wasn't designed for, it's on you - not them; your life, not theirs.

Let's look at the above information in the context of a W211 E55, which came from the factory fitted with 245/40/18 front and 265/35/18 rear tires mounted on 8" and 9" wide wheels, front and rear respectively. The stock overall tire diameters are 25.72" front and 25.3" rear. This means your plus size fitment ought to be as close as possible to these respective diameters in order to retain the correct gearing of the car and its speedometer accuracy.

Tire Rack's recommendation for the front size is correct. A 245/30/20 has an overall diameter of 25.79", which is almost identical to the stock size of 25.72". You're concerned about Tire Rack's recommendation of a 265/30/20 for the rear. Given the wheel width you've indicated of only 9.5", that's also an appropriate recommedation since the approved rim range for that size tire is 9" - 10". The next size wider tire, a 275/30/20, also requires a 9" - 10" rim, but its overall diameter is way too tall, coming in at 26.5" - which is over a full inch taller that the stock tire diameter and is not recommended. The tire size that does work is the 285/25/20, with its diameter of 25.61". Unfortunately for you, this size tire requires wheels with a 10" - 11" width for safe mounting, with most tire manufacturers specifying use of a 10.5" wide wheel only. It's just dumb to mount this size tire on a rim it wasn't designed for.

A third factor to also take a look at is the load range of the tires in question. In the case of 20" wheels on an E55, there's little doubt that the correct size front tire, a 245/30/20, is way down at the lower end of a safe load index for a heavy car like the W211 chassis, while the correct sized tire for the rear, a 285/25/20 has a completely sufficient load range. If load range issues concern you, then consider using a 255/30/20 in front, but know that it will be about a quarter of an inch taller than the stock tire diameter, which isn't much different than the 285/25/20's diameter is over its equivalent stock diameter of 25.3."
275/25_20
25.4" diameter

done
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 01:48 PM
  #11  
komp55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 6
ML550
Originally Posted by HeissRod
275/25_20
25.4" diameter

done

Bad choice. Here's specs for that size tire:

Specifications for tire
size: 275/25 20

UTQG: 220 AA A
Load Index: 91
Max Inflation Pressure: 50 psi
Tread Depth: 10/32nd"
Rim Width Range: 10.5-11.5
Meas. Rim Width: 10.5
Section Width: 10.5"
Tread Width: 11.9"
Overall Height: 25.8"
Revolutions per Mile: 805

Not designed for a 9.5" rim. Plus, load index on a 275/25/20 is only 91. Load index on the stock 265/35/18 is 97. Huge difference in safety margin. I wouldn't run this size on a 9.5" wide rim under any circumstances.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 02:16 PM
  #12  
HeissRod's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,429
Likes: 61
From: Cypress, TX
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
All that is a moot point at TireRack doesn't carry a 275/25_20

P.S. Where did you get your specs? You have the diameter listed as 25.8"? You sure you aren't looking at specs for a 295/25_20?

Last edited by HeissRod; Mar 28, 2011 at 02:22 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 02:29 PM
  #13  
AKnight55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,759
Likes: 96
From: NH
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
Originally Posted by komp55
Bad choice. Here's specs for that size tire:

Specifications for tire
size: 275/25 20

UTQG: 220 AA A
Load Index: 91
Max Inflation Pressure: 50 psi
Tread Depth: 10/32nd"
Rim Width Range: 10.5-11.5
Meas. Rim Width: 10.5
Section Width: 10.5"
Tread Width: 11.9"
Overall Height: 25.8"
Revolutions per Mile: 805

Not designed for a 9.5" rim. Plus, load index on a 275/25/20 is only 91. Load index on the stock 265/35/18 is 97. Huge difference in safety margin. I wouldn't run this size on a 9.5" wide rim under any circumstances.
Im not sure what your talking about... A 275 tire fits perfectly on a 9.5 inch wheel... This is my exact set up..A 285 tire will even work on a 9.5 inch wheel..

To the OP, go with a 285/25/20 as so many have already done..

Komp55... I just looked at one of your old posts and it says your running a 275 on a 9.5 wheel, so where do you come off saying it wont work??

Last edited by AKnight55; Mar 28, 2011 at 02:41 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 02:47 PM
  #14  
komp55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 6
ML550
Originally Posted by andrew knight
Komp55... I just looked at one of your old posts and it says your running a 275 on a 9.5 wheel, so where do you come off saying it wont work??
On a 19" rim. With a 30 aspect ratio. Big difference.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 06:49 PM
  #15  
AKnight55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,759
Likes: 96
From: NH
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
Originally Posted by komp55
On a 19" rim. With a 30 aspect ratio. Big difference.
so your saying on a 20" rim a 275/25/20 or 285/25/20 wouldn't work on a 9.5 inch wheel?? That doesn't make sense..
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 06:54 PM
  #16  
Staff@RPM's Avatar
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Well, just to state what I am using on a 20"x9.5" wheel is a 295/25-20 Conti. I think it's crazy to stretch a 265 onto a 9.5" wheel.

I'm not a big fan of the stretched look so I went with a wider tire, just my taste.

Last edited by Staff@RPM; Mar 28, 2011 at 06:57 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 08:26 PM
  #17  
komp55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 6
ML550
Originally Posted by andrew knight
so your saying on a 20" rim a 275/25/20 or 285/25/20 wouldn't work on a 9.5 inch wheel?? That doesn't make sense..
Let me explain it again. There is a significant difference between what size tire you can physically mount on a particular rim and what size rim width is specified for a particular size tire. I'm saying a 285/25/20 tire should NOT be mounted on a 9.5" rim because the rim is narrower than what the tire was designed for. Most tire manufacturers specify a 10.5" wide rim for this size. Same issue for a 275/25/20 tire. The minimum specified rim width is 10" (see Nitto Invo specifications for this size tire at Nitto's website). Plus, this size doesn't have a sufficient load index for a heavy car like the W211, so it's an unsafe choice from that perspective as well.

Can both size tires be mounted on a 9.5" wide 20" diameter wheel? Of course, but that's why we have stuff like the annual Darwin awards. YMMV.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 09:08 PM
  #18  
AKnight55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,759
Likes: 96
From: NH
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
Originally Posted by komp55
Let me explain it again. There is a significant difference between what size tire you can physically mount on a particular rim and what size rim width is specified for a particular size tire. I'm saying a 285/25/20 tire should NOT be mounted on a 9.5" rim because the rim is narrower than what the tire was designed for. Most tire manufacturers specify a 10.5" wide rim for this size. Same issue for a 275/25/20 tire. The minimum specified rim width is 10" (see Nitto Invo specifications for this size tire at Nitto's website). Plus, this size doesn't have a sufficient load index for a heavy car like the W211, so it's an unsafe choice from that perspective as well.

Can both size tires be mounted on a 9.5" wide 20" diameter wheel? Of course, but that's why we have stuff like the annual Darwin awards. YMMV.
OEM is a 265 on a 9" wheel, so I would needing a 10" wheel for a 275 is a bit conservative. Personally I'd go with a 285/25/20 and roll the fenders a bit to avoid any rubbing...
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 08:23 AM
  #19  
GregMB's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 12
From: The Granite State
.
Originally Posted by andrew knight
OEM is a 265 on a 9" wheel, so I would needing a 10" wheel for a 275 is a bit conservative. Personally I'd go with a 285/25/20 and roll the fenders a bit to avoid any rubbing...
Is there any wheel offset that will allow for the use of a 285-width tire without resorting to rolling the rear fenders? Tucking the wheel in a little deeper into the wheel well may just move the problem from the fender lip to rubbing against the suspension bits....


-G
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 03:49 PM
  #20  
HeissRod's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,429
Likes: 61
From: Cypress, TX
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by GregMB
Is there any wheel offset that will allow for the use of a 285-width tire without resorting to rolling the rear fenders? Tucking the wheel in a little deeper into the wheel well may just move the problem from the fender lip to rubbing against the suspension bits....

-G
Lots of cars here run 285s. I'm running 285s on a 10.5" wheel and I'm lowered with STAR.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 11:18 AM
  #21  
dychen's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: PHX and NYC
11 QX56, 09 E63, 00 S2000
Aren't the P30 package wheels 9.5" wide running a 265 tire in the rear?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 11:29 AM
  #22  
skratch77's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 381
2005 E55
I thought e55s had 9.5 in the rears?

When I ordered my wheels they kept pushing me to get a 10 in wide wheel but I told them I wanted to run a 265 or a 275 max on them.

I ended up going 18x9.5 in the rears with a 275/35/18
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2011 | 04:03 PM
  #23  
AKnight55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,759
Likes: 96
From: NH
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
Originally Posted by skratch77
I thought e55s had 9.5 in the rears?

When I ordered my wheels they kept pushing me to get a 10 in wide wheel but I told them I wanted to run a 265 or a 275 max on them.

I ended up going 18x9.5 in the rears with a 275/35/18
Stock e55 wheels are 9" rears, im almost positive..
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE