M113K engine recirculating flap function
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2005 BMW M3, 1974 Opel Manta
M113K engine recirculating flap function
Hi guys, I've been reading through a lot of the posts on the Recirculating flap on these engines. I'm currently wiring one of these engines with a Haltech Elite 2500 ECU. I have some questions regarding this
1) Does anyone have wiring schematic for this part?
2) What would be the best way to make this function (WOT, MAP etc)
3) If I blanked this off and didn't use it would it cause any issues? (I know the supercharged would be running full time and creating extra heat)
1974 Opel Manta with M113K engine
1) Does anyone have wiring schematic for this part?
2) What would be the best way to make this function (WOT, MAP etc)
3) If I blanked this off and didn't use it would it cause any issues? (I know the supercharged would be running full time and creating extra heat)
1974 Opel Manta with M113K engine
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,371
Received 1,008 Likes
on
782 Posts
'99 and '05 E55 AMG
Quick description:
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...ml#post7406610
Info from:
http://www.hehlhans.de/motorg55-7.htm
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...ml#post7406610
Info from:
http://www.hehlhans.de/motorg55-7.htm
The following users liked this post:
Scrapile (03-27-2018)
The following users liked this post:
Scrapile (03-27-2018)
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2005 BMW M3, 1974 Opel Manta
So Haltech support said they dont think their system supports this. Seems like BS as it can handle DBW and all this really seems to be is a second throttle body (albeit activated differently).
Anyone know the wiring for this? It has 6 wires and the same plug as the throttle body.
I guess if I cant figure it I'll end up blanking it off
Anyone know the wiring for this? It has 6 wires and the same plug as the throttle body.
I guess if I cant figure it I'll end up blanking it off
Trending Topics
#8
Super Member
iTrader: (2)
look up the OP on this thread ,,,, also not sure how weistec does it but they may not have a bypass like ours -- simple blow off valve based on vacuum ?
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...cu-pinout.html
these motors are great
keep us posted --
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...cu-pinout.html
these motors are great
keep us posted --
#9
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
20 Posts
1990 300ce supercharged and intercooled
It really is not necessary. Tuning for it to work the way the factory intended would take a bit of effort. I really do not see the point of it other than to run in N/A mode and not drag through the blower when the clutch in not engaged. You could easily run an RPM//window switch function for the supercharger clutch to turn off at idle or near idle and use it as a safety feature as well if you wanted. Over temp etc.
It is a DBW actuator but running it would require a completely separate map from your main one. I am assuming that they just do not have that function built in to the controller. It would require special firmware and cal tables to build an independent setup like that.
It is a DBW actuator but running it would require a completely separate map from your main one. I am assuming that they just do not have that function built in to the controller. It would require special firmware and cal tables to build an independent setup like that.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2005 BMW M3, 1974 Opel Manta
look up the OP on this thread ,,,, also not sure how weistec does it but they may not have a bypass like ours -- simple blow off valve based on vacuum ?
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...cu-pinout.html
these motors are great
keep us posted --
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...cu-pinout.html
these motors are great
keep us posted --
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2005 BMW M3, 1974 Opel Manta
It really is not necessary. Tuning for it to work the way the factory intended would take a bit of effort. I really do not see the point of it other than to run in N/A mode and not drag through the blower when the clutch in not engaged. You could easily run an RPM//window switch function for the supercharger clutch to turn off at idle or near idle and use it as a safety feature as well if you wanted. Over temp etc.
It is a DBW actuator but running it would require a completely separate map from your main one. I am assuming that they just do not have that function built in to the controller. It would require special firmware and cal tables to build an independent setup like that.
It is a DBW actuator but running it would require a completely separate map from your main one. I am assuming that they just do not have that function built in to the controller. It would require special firmware and cal tables to build an independent setup like that.
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2005 BMW M3, 1974 Opel Manta
I used to have a C320 hatchback and saw how much room there was in the engine bay. Started investigating if I'd be able to put the M113K engine in that. Car got totalled when a lady T-boned me. After that I always had this engine in mind as its a great engine and I like to do things differently. I could easily drop an LS1 engine in my Manta and plug in an off the shelf ECU but where is the fun in that?
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,371
Received 1,008 Likes
on
782 Posts
'99 and '05 E55 AMG
So Haltech support said they dont think their system supports this. Seems like BS as it can handle DBW and all this really seems to be is a second throttle body (albeit activated differently).
Anyone know the wiring for this? It has 6 wires and the same plug as the throttle body.
I guess if I cant figure it I'll end up blanking it off
Anyone know the wiring for this? It has 6 wires and the same plug as the throttle body.
I guess if I cant figure it I'll end up blanking it off
I'm beginning to see why Mercedes charges so much for their cars...
I love what you are doing even though I gave up on custom cars years ago. I budgeted 6 weeks and $1600 and it took me 120 weeks and $8000 the last time I went for a custom build...thus the reason I now leave my cars stock....
Best of luck to you and may you be wildly successful!
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,421
Received 284 Likes
on
233 Posts
2005 E55 AMG, 1991 MR2
Are we talking about the supercharger bypass valve? I would program it to operate both with rpm and run in accordance with throttle position. At idle and two hundred rpm above it is open. I don't know the exact TPS % but others might but basically light loads ie cruising it is open no matter the rpm, at higher loads it is closed no matter what the rpm is.
Your ECU can definitely do this. It is more likely they don't know how it operates and don't care to investigate since this is not a common engine for swaps or standalone ecu's. If you run with a permanently closed bypass and a fixed pulley I can't see how the supercharger wouldn't destroy itself.
Your ECU can definitely do this. It is more likely they don't know how it operates and don't care to investigate since this is not a common engine for swaps or standalone ecu's. If you run with a permanently closed bypass and a fixed pulley I can't see how the supercharger wouldn't destroy itself.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,669
Received 1,093 Likes
on
880 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
You don't want to run without the bypass valve. The heat and drag generated are excessive. You would not be able to control your IAT's and the mileage will take a big hit. I've run with and without and there is a big difference in efficiency. Just use a vacuum actuated bypass valve and you will be fine.
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2005 BMW M3, 1974 Opel Manta
You don't want to run without the bypass valve. The heat and drag generated are excessive. You would not be able to control your IAT's and the mileage will take a big hit. I've run with and without and there is a big difference in efficiency. Just use a vacuum actuated bypass valve and you will be fine.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2005 BMW M3, 1974 Opel Manta
I'm hoping something like this could be adapted https://bahnbrenner.com/vw_audi/prod...cuum_Activated
#21
Senior Member
I run a twin throttle Whipple blower without the bypass on this engine and it works just fine on a standalone ECU (Link Thunder). The idle in my car as been set to 750ish and so it doesn't kill the engine on the throttle blip.
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2005 BMW M3, 1974 Opel Manta
If I can adapt a vacuum actuated bypass valve I may go that way.
One other thought would be to machine a part to replace the original electronic bypass valve and fit a blow off valve. I know that this would mean the supercharger would be working all of the time and generating more heat, but would hope the blow off valve would be a little protection in case the engine produced too much boost (see pic). Is this a viable option?
One other thought would be to machine a part to replace the original electronic bypass valve and fit a blow off valve. I know that this would mean the supercharger would be working all of the time and generating more heat, but would hope the blow off valve would be a little protection in case the engine produced too much boost (see pic). Is this a viable option?
#25
Senior Member
You can fit a bypass valve of course but it's not used as a protection. Even in the standard setup it's only used for emissions and cruising. The boost is generated by the supercharger not the engine as I'm sure you know. It is belt driven so you can choose a pulley that is 'safe' for your scenario. Personally, I would keep things simple. Everyone keeps insisting on the bypass but I have not one but two throttle bodies and a bigger blower and the car is as civilised as they come. I'd suggest finding a better tuner, not complicating the setup.
The following users liked this post:
Scrapile (05-30-2018)