W212 AMG Discuss the W212 AMG's such as the E63

Competition: 2016 Cadillac CTS-V - 640hp/630 tq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 08:06 AM
  #1  
InTheBenz0's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 14
From: North/Central NJ
GLC 63 S AMG / Corvette C8 / Jaguar SVR
Competition: 2016 Cadillac CTS-V - 640hp/630 tq

http://www.edmunds.com/auto-shows/de...cat=affiliates

And we all know those numbers are detuned as the Z06 makes 650/650.

Great to have competition.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 08:57 AM
  #2  
ucla95's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 233
Likes: 3
E63S, RRS SVR
a lot of HP for RWD.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 11:33 AM
  #3  
Zybane's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Lotus Exige S260 Sport
Ya, being RWD only I don't think it's much competition. AWD far superior.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 12:35 PM
  #4  
InTheBenz0's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 14
From: North/Central NJ
GLC 63 S AMG / Corvette C8 / Jaguar SVR
Originally Posted by Zybane
Ya, being RWD only I don't think it's much competition. AWD far superior.
The handling of the car on a well prepped track which it would be if you are auto-xing is not going to make a difference.

AWD just allows average or bad drivers to drive better. If you take 2 skilled drivers and put 1 in a GTR and 1 in a Vette... the awd is negligible.

From a highway roll - AWD actually hurts...

The only thing AWD is good for is 0-60 and it helps in the 1/4 mile because of traction.

It also allows people in northern climates to drive year round.

I like awd...Even if the CTS-V is a bit quicker, I like the looks and awd of the E63.

However, GM giving it 640 hp is great. It will likely up all the competition.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 02:23 PM
  #5  
PeterUbers's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,228
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
Originally Posted by InTheBenz0
The handling of the car on a well prepped track which it would be if you are auto-xing is not going to make a difference.

AWD just allows average or bad drivers to drive better. If you take 2 skilled drivers and put 1 in a GTR and 1 in a Vette... the awd is negligible.

From a highway roll - AWD actually hurts...

The only thing AWD is good for is 0-60 and it helps in the 1/4 mile because of traction.

It also allows people in northern climates to drive year round.

I like awd...Even if the CTS-V is a bit quicker, I like the looks and awd of the E63.

However, GM giving it 640 hp is great. It will likely up all the competition.
Agreed

On an airstrip, which most if us will never be on... The caddy will blaze past a 4matix e63, but not necessarily a euro '14+ e63 rwd....

And it's only 131 lbs lighter than the e63 piggy

Last edited by PeterUbers; Dec 22, 2014 at 02:40 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 02:51 PM
  #6  
ucla95's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 233
Likes: 3
E63S, RRS SVR
Originally Posted by InTheBenz0
The only thing AWD is good for is 0-60 and it helps in the 1/4 mile because of traction.
In real world driving some very high powered RWD cars can have difficulty putting power down in turns as well.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 02:53 PM
  #7  
Lenin's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 27
From: North NJ
2002 C32 AMG, 2013 GLK 350/4, 2015 E63S AMG Wagon
At only 154 extra pounds with a split of 33/67 front/rear the E63S AWD will be very competitive with the new CTS-V. I already have one supercharged AMG and even here in NJ in the winter when it snows, I can't jump a small lip to get into my driveway unless I start picking up speed at the very bottom of a small hill down my street.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 02:55 PM
  #8  
Lenin's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 27
From: North NJ
2002 C32 AMG, 2013 GLK 350/4, 2015 E63S AMG Wagon
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
Agreed

On an airstrip, which most if us will never be on... The caddy will blaze past a 4matix e63, but not necessarily a euro '14+ e63 rwd....

And it's only 131 lbs lighter than the e63 piggy
I heard it was 154lb. 131lb is even better.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 10:18 PM
  #9  
6.3AMG's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: NY
2007 Corvette Z06/2011 BMW M3
E63 AMG S-4,511lbs(Motortrend vs M5)
CTS-V-4,145lbs

Thats a lot more then 131lbs.

Last edited by 6.3AMG; Dec 22, 2014 at 10:24 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2014 | 11:19 PM
  #10  
dtothedtotheo's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
any info on what the new mb 4.0 turbo will output on the 2016 e63?
the amg gt produces 503 horsepower
any chance they will up it to 600+ to match gm?
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 01:15 AM
  #11  
TopGun32's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 10
From: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Caddy will no doubt be a beast. They had to look to match HellCat, but in doing so they also dropped AMG and M a good counter move.


The CTS will be about performance, handling and bang for the buck. The updated design is great but they kept it simple. The large rear wing is off place. Good job by GM. Engine will be tuner friendly and plenty of additional aftermarket support.

Right now, the RS line up will be hard to beat. AMG needs a 9 speed or DCT to catch up. The new engine will be a good starting point.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 02:13 AM
  #12  
6.3AMG's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: NY
2007 Corvette Z06/2011 BMW M3
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 11:49 AM
  #13  
PeterUbers's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,228
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
I'm definitely going to test drive this car... if it came with AWD .. it would make me think long and hard...
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 12:28 PM
  #14  
Lenin's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 27
From: North NJ
2002 C32 AMG, 2013 GLK 350/4, 2015 E63S AMG Wagon
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
I'm definitely going to test drive this car... if it came with AWD .. it would make me think long and hard...
+1.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 12:39 PM
  #15  
PeterUbers's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,228
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
Originally Posted by dtothedtotheo
any info on what the new mb 4.0 turbo will output on the 2016 e63?
the amg gt produces 503 horsepower
any chance they will up it to 600+ to match gm?
No word yet but I'll be a bit surprised if the new e63 loses hp and tq for 2017... That being said amg models have been underrated on power historically and the key is end user performance ...
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 02:14 PM
  #16  
Lenin's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 27
From: North NJ
2002 C32 AMG, 2013 GLK 350/4, 2015 E63S AMG Wagon
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
No word yet but I'll be a bit surprised if the new e63 loses hp and tq for 2017... That being said amg models have been underrated on power historically and the key is end user performance ...
I want to see how AMG will give the 2017 E63S more HP than AMG GT S. We will be entering the AMG GT Black Series territory. Marketing wise I don't think AMG will ever do it. I'm also not sure how easy the new 4.0 twin turbo engine will scale up for more HP given it's turbos are sitting inside the V. That should generate a lot of heat and heat is the enemy of forced induction. A lot of extra pluming will be required to get it to 600HP.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 02:44 PM
  #17  
PeterUbers's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,228
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
Originally Posted by Lenin
I want to see how AMG will give the 2017 E63S more HP than AMG GT S. We will be entering the AMG GT Black Series territory. Marketing wise I don't think AMG will ever do it. I'm also not sure how easy the new 4.0 twin turbo engine will scale up for more HP given it's turbos are sitting inside the V. That should generate a lot of heat and heat is the enemy of forced induction. A lot of extra pluming will be required to get it to 600HP.
Interesting... That's the question is what does amg have up their sleeve for e63 ... Doesn't e63 have more power than sls now though?
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 02:53 PM
  #18  
richardaz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 133
Likes: 2
From: Scottsdale, AZ
2013 SL63, 2014 E63S Estate, 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo (gone but not forgotten), 2015 SQ5
Originally Posted by InTheBenz0
The handling of the car on a well prepped track which it would be if you are auto-xing is not going to make a difference.

AWD just allows average or bad drivers to drive better. If you take 2 skilled drivers and put 1 in a GTR and 1 in a Vette... the awd is negligible.

From a highway roll - AWD actually hurts...

The only thing AWD is good for is 0-60 and it helps in the 1/4 mile because of traction.

It also allows people in northern climates to drive year round.

I like awd...Even if the CTS-V is a bit quicker, I like the looks and awd of the E63.

However, GM giving it 640 hp is great. It will likely up all the competition.

GM is advertising 0-60 in 3.7 seconds. The E63S wagon is testing at 3.4-3.5 seconds. That is one advantage of AWD.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 02:58 PM
  #19  
Lenin's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 27
From: North NJ
2002 C32 AMG, 2013 GLK 350/4, 2015 E63S AMG Wagon
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
Interesting... That's the question is what does amg have up their sleeve for e63 ... Doesn't e63 have more power than sls now though?
Close but SLS has more HP.

E63S = 577HP
2015 SLS AMG = 583 HP
SLS Black Series = 631 HP
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 03:22 PM
  #20  
PeterUbers's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,228
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
Originally Posted by Lenin
Close but SLS has more HP.

E63S = 577HP
2015 SLS AMG = 583 HP
SLS Black Series = 631 HP
Interesting....then of course there is advertised power and actual higher rating on a dyno
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 03:45 PM
  #21  
otakki's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 54
FF. W212 E63 M156 non-pano 18" P2 ParkT NightV (gone but will be missed).
I wonder what kind of transmission is in the new V. A DCT will be a winner.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 04:57 PM
  #22  
looney100's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 746
Likes: 26
None
They're using the same tranny as in the Vette.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 08:50 PM
  #23  
cnolke's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 344
Likes: 1
'12 E63 Wagon
The third-gen CTS is very similar inside to the second. I had a second gen ('09) CTS-V sedan and really liked several aspects about it.

-the manual 6-speed. Same transmission as my Z06.
-the suspension. I've always maintained that the CTS-V has the best combination comfort/track-worthy suspension in the world; on par with a Cayman S.
-the simplicity/reliability of it all. It was a really straightforward car to own.

Things I didnt like-
-the mileage. Holy 12mpg, batman. Why 2400 rpm on the highway in 6th???
-the Recaro seats. Awesome for the first hour in the car. Torture after that.
-the size. It doesn't baby well, and even the wagon wasnt a proper wagon like the E or the RS6.
-the refinement. Awesome for a GM. Still no E63.

Take this, CTS-V...

Reply
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 09:11 PM
  #24  
cnolke's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 344
Likes: 1
'12 E63 Wagon
Originally Posted by Lenin
Close but SLS has more HP.

E63S = 577HP
2015 SLS AMG = 583 HP
SLS Black Series = 631 HP
The drivetrains in the SLS and the E63 share their manufacturer and thats about it. The SLS is a horsepower engine that works well at the track with a quick DCT. It's quirky in traffic, but not terrible. The E63 is all torque and tractability and great in traffic, but the drivetrain is not built for the track.

The GT-S wouldn't do well with the M157 and MCT-7, and I doubt the E63 will get it's drivetrain in its entirety.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2014 | 06:53 AM
  #25  
sdg1871's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 30
From: New York, NY
2019 E63 S
Originally Posted by cnolke
The drivetrains in the SLS and the E63 share their manufacturer and thats about it. The SLS is a horsepower engine that works well at the track with a quick DCT. It's quirky in traffic, but not terrible. The E63 is all torque and tractability and great in traffic, but the drivetrain is not built for the track.

The GT-S wouldn't do well with the M157 and MCT-7, and I doubt the E63 will get it's drivetrain in its entirety.
From what I understand the 212 E63's successor will have a version of the 4.0 TT V8 that now sits in the AMG GT and new C63. I do think AMG would have a marketing issue giving the lower priced E63 more power than the AMG GT S model. This is one of the reasons I jumped all over the 2015 E63 S -- I wanted the M157 engine. With this engine and full Renntech tune, downpipes and sport mufflers, my car's output will be 726 bhp and 875 lbs ft at the crank.

I do not see the 4.0L TT V8 reaching those power levels without a turbo upgrade -- an engine and transmission life shortening mod that I would never do on a car I intend to keep for many years.

I think that AMG will keep similar levels of acceleration performance in the upcoming new E63 as the W212 E63 though reductions in the car's weight using space age materials like carbon fiber reinforced plastic. But weight reduction does not make as much of a difference at higher speeds where horsepower is king.

Blame it all on CAFE requirements.

As far as the Caddy goes it will be a killer bang for the buck performance car. But I would never want RWD will all of that power. When I floor it I want the car to surge forward and not kill the fun with traction control intervention and that only happens on a high horsepower car when it has AWD -- one of the biggest reasons I bought the 2014 Porsche 991 Turbo S and the 2015 E63 S.

Last edited by sdg1871; Dec 24, 2014 at 06:58 AM.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE