Post the dyno numbers of your m157 biturbo car
#102
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 12,139
Likes: 2,216
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
607 AWHP
669 AWTQ
Canned "Stage 2" 93 tune from Boosted Benz and ECC.
Downpipes, BB intake
Reading that others are making 100lbs more torque. Tuner recommended keeping curve flat and safe for DD and focus on a more aggressive E tune for the track. What do you guys think of that and this curve?
https://youtu.be/Rj9VU9QzZtY
669 AWTQ
Canned "Stage 2" 93 tune from Boosted Benz and ECC.
Downpipes, BB intake
Reading that others are making 100lbs more torque. Tuner recommended keeping curve flat and safe for DD and focus on a more aggressive E tune for the track. What do you guys think of that and this curve?
https://youtu.be/Rj9VU9QzZtY
#103
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 327
Likes: 108
From: Finland
2015 CLS550 Shooting brake 4-matic
607 AWHP
669 AWTQ
Canned "Stage 2" 93 tune from Boosted Benz and ECC.
Downpipes, BB intake
Reading that others are making 100lbs more torque. Tuner recommended keeping curve flat and safe for DD and focus on a more aggressive E tune for the track. What do you guys think of that and this curve?
https://youtu.be/Rj9VU9QzZtY
669 AWTQ
Canned "Stage 2" 93 tune from Boosted Benz and ECC.
Downpipes, BB intake
Reading that others are making 100lbs more torque. Tuner recommended keeping curve flat and safe for DD and focus on a more aggressive E tune for the track. What do you guys think of that and this curve?
https://youtu.be/Rj9VU9QzZtY
Last edited by PekkaH; 11-13-2022 at 04:45 AM. Reason: edit
The following users liked this post:
I.T. Guy (11-13-2022)
#104
That torque curve looks nice and flat, no spike in low end and then no falling down on top end. Really looking forward to see what Dragy results your car can produce like 1/4 mile and 60-130mp/h and I can also compare those to my car. For now I think the USA dynos shows some more power than in Europe. Nice to see that your car is up and running strong!
The following users liked this post:
I.T. Guy (11-13-2022)
#105
Yes ECC stage 1 is applied too
New limits
1st 800nm 590 ft-lbs
2nd 900nm 663 ft-lbs
3rd and up 1100nm 811 ft-lbs
Line pressure increased by 15% from 2.5k rpm to redline in every gear.
Shift points are not modified.
I *really* hope the brake boost thing is applied too - will find out soon as it stops raining!
New limits
1st 800nm 590 ft-lbs
2nd 900nm 663 ft-lbs
3rd and up 1100nm 811 ft-lbs
Line pressure increased by 15% from 2.5k rpm to redline in every gear.
Shift points are not modified.
I *really* hope the brake boost thing is applied too - will find out soon as it stops raining!
#106
That torque curve looks nice and flat, no spike in low end and then no falling down on top end. Really looking forward to see what Dragy results your car can produce like 1/4 mile and 60-130mp/h and I can also compare those to my car. For now I think the USA dynos shows some more power than in Europe. Nice to see that your car is up and running strong!
The following users liked this post:
PekkaH (11-13-2022)
The following users liked this post:
thesaintusa (11-17-2022)
#108
Super Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 563
Likes: 79
From: Canada
2019 911 GTS / 2016 X3 / 2015 E63s / 1993 RX-7
#109
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,696
Likes: 1,102
From: In my garage
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
If you ever have hp and torque that do not cross at 5252, please ask them why and have them adjust so they intersect at the correct point. Why 5252? HP = (torque x RPM)/5252
#110
I generally hate different scale graphs, even aside from dynos
The following users liked this post:
brfatal (11-18-2022)
#111
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,696
Likes: 1,102
From: In my garage
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
It should never be anything other than hp/torque crossing at 5252. Again, if not, ask that they remove whatever manipulation they've applied and correct the scaling.
#112
Graphs like this are used when the HP and torque numbers are vastly different from each other (like torque being 100+ higher than HP across a part of the range).
#113
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,696
Likes: 1,102
From: In my garage
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Not saying they are not correct numbers but why do that? Yes, on the graph they are scaled differently but again it makes no sense to do so. Post the correct graph where they intersect at the right point so you know the numbers were not manipulated to look bigger than they are.
HP is a calculation of torque over time which is RPM. HP = (torque x RPM) / 5252. That's the way it calculates HP so why change the scale? Again, the only reason to do this is so it looks more powerful = optics.
HP is a calculation of torque over time which is RPM. HP = (torque x RPM) / 5252. That's the way it calculates HP so why change the scale? Again, the only reason to do this is so it looks more powerful = optics.